Italian Cruise Line disaster

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Just learned (email from a European friend) it's even worse than that. Heavy seas and winds have shifted the vessel, it's now teetering on the edge of an abyss while the Dutch company Smit Salvage tries to pump out 4500 tons of heavy fuel oil before the ship either breaks up or goes down, or both. If it breaks up or goes down with the fuel oil still aboard we have the makings of a major ecological disaster.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
I was wondering if anyone knew why he is being accused of manslaughter. The news reports I read didn't have any explanation. Was it his guidance of the ship into the rocks? Not having anyone in the bridge? Having an accident then trying to save your own life isn't manslaughter.

The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.

Negligence would be more like not checking that flashing red light on the console. Purposefully breaking safety regulations in order to impress your friend makes you much more directly culpable. If an airline pilot did a barrel roll halfway over the atlantic just to impress the stewardess... that's not negligence--despite what Tex Johnson has to say:

707 roll - YouTube
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.

Taking the ship off autopilot means that somebody had to steer it. It is my understanding that most of these ships have
side-scan sonar that would have kept the captain, or whoever was driving appraised of the dangers, if the sonar was even on.
To tear a fifty meter gash in the hull suggests that the ship was moving at a pretty good speed. I can't think of a way to forgive
the captain's irresponsible blunder.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.

Ummmmmmmmmmmm- Not a candidate for Mensa! Or even I.A.! :smile:
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
~~~ manslaughter ~~~


Sea going ships have sonar equipment which gives profiles of the surfaces beneath them. If the captain and his crew bothered to view signal detections they could have easily seen the sandbar underneath and not run aground. Ships don't get pushed by strong winds and suddenly veer into land masses. It would take a massive wave of almost astronomical proportions to do that. Clearly, the captain and his crew were criminally negligent and jeopardized the vessel and the passengers. Therefore based on these facts (if proven in court), and the resulting deaths, warrant convictions due to manslaughter.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.
Fair enough. The news reports were just saying he was accused of manslaughter, without expanding on under what grounds.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I like this bit from the Globe and Mail:

"Mr. Schettino has insisted he stayed aboard until the ship was evacuated, but the recording of his conversation with Italian Coast Guard Capt. Gregorio De Falco indicates he fled before all passengers were off — and then resisted Mr. De Falco's repeated orders to return.
“You go on board and then you will tell me how many people there are. Is that clear?” Mr. De Falco shouted in the audio tape.
Mr. Schettino resisted, saying the ship was tipping and that it was dark. At the time, he was in a lifeboat and said he was coordinating the rescue from there.
Mr. De Falco shouted back: “And so what? You want go home, Schettino? It is dark and you want to go home? Get on that prow of the boat using the pilot ladder and tell me what can be done, how many people there are and what their needs are. Now!”
“You go aboard. It is an order. Don't make any more excuses. You have declared the abandoning of the ship, now I am in charge,” Mr. De Falco shouted."
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
I like this bit from the Globe and Mail:
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship. It was dark, and the
ship was listing at an impossible angle. I don't think anyone could have said the ship wouldn't completely capsize at any
moment. The whole mess was the responsibility of the captain because he ordered the course change that led to the ship
going aground but the reasons for the ensuing panic are also understandable.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship. It was dark, and the
ship was listing at an impossible angle. I don't think anyone could have said the ship wouldn't completely capsize at any
moment. The whole mess was the responsibility of the captain because he ordered the course change that led to the ship
going aground but the reasons for the ensuing panic are also understandable.

Yep, he was probably in over his head and should probably be restricted to 12' vessels powered by a pair of oars! :smile:
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship.

But the point is, his job was to stay there and take charge of the evacuation.

I doubt that he'll ever work as a Captain again, with this track record.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
But the point is, his job was to stay there and take charge of the evacuation.

I doubt that he'll ever work as a Captain again, with this track record.

I think that point has already been made. Looking at the photos, the decks are pretty much vertical, making rescue work
of any kind very difficult. At this point, the captain is all but irrelevant until the trial.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,032
3,605
113
News Weird
Czech supermodel doomed luxury liner?

0 Comments
WENN.com
First posted: Sunday, January 15, 2012 10:31 AM EST | Updated: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:18 PM EST


Former top model Eva Herzigova (REUTERS/Eric Gaillard)

Supermodel Eva Herzigova predicted disaster when she launched the doomed Italian cruise ship which ran aground Jan. 14 after the traditional Champagne bottle ceremony went horribly wrong.
It has now emerged Czech beauty Herzigova launched the ship back in 2006, but the ceremony went awry when the Champagne bottle, which is traditionally smashed against the hull, failed to break.
According to maritime folklore, an 'unsmashed' bottle spells bad luck for the ship.
The Costa Concordia capsized off the coast of Italy after hitting rocks just yards from a dock on the island of Giglio.
Three people have been confirmed dead and more than 70 remain missing as emergency workers continue to hunt for survivors of the disaster, which has left the massive vessel semi-submerged on its side.

Czech supermodel doomed luxury liner? | Weird | News | Toronto Sun
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
6,041
583
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
Supermodel Eva Herzigova predicted disaster when she launched the doomed Italian cruise ship which ran aground Jan. 14 after the traditional Champagne bottle ceremony went horribly wrong.
It has now emerged Czech beauty Herzigova launched the ship back in 2006, but the ceremony went awry when the Champagne bottle, which is traditionally smashed against the hull, failed to break.
According to maritime folklore, an 'unsmashed' bottle spells bad luck for the ship.
Typical Italian 'champagne'-horribly oversweetened crud in a bottle as thick as a brick.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Typical Italian 'champagne'-horribly oversweetened crud in a bottle as thick as a brick.

Kind of ties in nicely with the line from George Carlin about when you consider how stupid the average person is and then realize half are worse than THAT! :lol::lol::lol::lol: