Just a few points I'd like to make here.
I'd seriously considered adopting Islam once when I was in high school while reading the very Qur'an which seems to turn so many off. I actually did not see it as so war mongering but rather quite progressive relatively speaking. The reason I did not accept it in the end was because I thought some of its laws were outdated. That doesn't mean, however, that I cannot understand the potential benefits of such laws for their time in history.
I've also known adoptive Muslims choose to wear the veil. So to make it into an "immigrants and ferriners refusin to similate" issue is rediculous, as it implies that some of those who were born and raised in Canada in non-Muslim families have in fact chosen to "similate" into the Muslim community. So does that make them "ferriners" too, even if they are white and of a WASP family background?
The reason I can see it from that perspective, even if I don't fully agree with it, is because I myself had seriously considered adopting Islam once. I was a pacifist at the time, but willing to consider other options, so I certainly wasn't some warmonger looking for a warlike religion. Yes, I'd read the Qur'an and Holy War stuff in it, but I simply did not see it in the same light as others do; I simply recognized that war is necessary at times, and that pacifism is not always a wise move. And again, seeng that I had no Muslim friends at the time, and most of what I knew about islam was terrorism on the news, how can one say that adopting Islam would be the PC thing to do? Far from it, adopting Islam is about as un-PC as it gets. It had nothing to do with pressure from friends either sinse at that time I had no Muslim friends; I'd merely gone to the school library and picked up a Qur'an after having learnt a little about Islam from my history teacher when studying modern Israel. What I was reading from the Qur'an itself was the only thing drawing me towards it. So if the Qur'an is that militant, then that would make me a psychopath too to actually feel an attraction to it.
I myself have sinse sufferred greatly from Muslim fanaticism. I don't cry often, but have shed many tears as a result of Islamic fanaticism in Canada, along with feeling tremendous pressure to adopt Islam as my religion, again to the point of driving me to tears. My ex had received threats of violence, I'd received much harassement, and others, both men and women, in the local community were pretend Muslims for protective purposes. I'd even had to move cities at one stage to separate myself from such a comunity, and it was a contributing factor to my divorce. All in Canada. And among the harassers was in fact a converted white Muslim Canadian, so let's not make this into a "ferriners fusin to similate" issue. So believe me, I know more about Islamic fanaticism than many in this forum. In fact I'd met many Muslims in Victoria BC before 2001, and may have met Ahmad Ressam, though I can't remember that for sure; but I do remember how many were not so welcomming of me after having asked me sinse when I'd converted to Islam (I, surprised that thy'd even come to the conclusion that I was a Muslim had ansered that I'd never converted to Islam). I also remember hearing various stories of theological conflicts between Muslims in Victoria. In anotehr case in Victoria, during a funeral, one man started spewing out garbage about how if Islam had the bomb, the world would respect it.
Yet when I'd read the Qur'an, I could see nothing of the sort. I'd even read the Qur'an on a number of occasions with pen and paper taking pages upon pages of notes, and categorising various verses according to a wide range of topics. I just don't see the Qur'an in that light, and have a radically different view of Jihad than do most Canadians I suppose.
So this whole thing about Islam being a warmongering religion really depends on one's take on the concept of war and peace. Does one accept Holy war, and under what conditions? What about just war, etc. Certainly a strict pacifist will never respect the Qur'an without changing his opinon of war as being just and even necessary on certain occasion, while also understanding the Qur'an within a historical context in which Islam was in fact under direct military threat during the time of Muhammad. So naturally teh Qur'an must be understood within that context along with the fact taht Pre-Islamic Arabs were truly a brutish and savage people; thus needless to say the Qur'an, while teaching them, would have had to take itself down to a level they could understand.