ISIS leader threatens Canada, says it will fight to the last man in audio recording

[Tecumsehsbones]

Well, seeing how it was done, low those many years ago, it's A-OK to do it today.

Business as usual

Yep, hypocritical fake moral indignation from people trying to get us into another war that ain't none of our business.

 

[CDNBear]

Yep, hypocritical fake moral indignation...

What a load of shyte.

Unless you have a time machine we can use to right the wrongs you keep using for your moral relativism.

 

[Machjo]

They won't be going anywhere in an effort to make Canadians safer.. we are not the USA and a populous that is easily hoodwinked, you know "The stupidity of the American voter."

That Charter is so damn good it's better than nothing.

 

[WLDB]

Meh, Im not particularly worried given he is wounded and we are fine.

I still feel quite secure in my bedroom so he hasnt even carried through on his original threat.

 

[coldstream]

“

America and its allies are terrified, weak, powerless,” he says, also condemning
the Jews who “covertly and stealthily participate in this crusade.”

Just means we're getting to them. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi will likely be dead in year.. taken out by missiles in one of those convoys that endlessly patrol his 'Caliphate'.

 

[lone wolf]

To the last man you say.

Challenge accepted.

You're not gonna fit on that recording

 

[grainfedpraiboy]

Is it just me or when ISIS starts talking about Jews and America do they sound like MHz?

 

[CDNBear]

Is it just me or when ISIS starts talking about Jews and America do they sound like MHz?

Just like. It's uncanny.

 

[SLM]

Is it just me or when ISIS starts talking about Jews and America do they sound like MHz?

Just like. It's uncanny.

Incoherent?

 

[petros]

I'd like to kick this guy in the nuts.

 

[darkbeaver]

"The Protection of Canada from Terrorists Act is just the first step in our efforts to do that."

There's something wrong with that sentence aint ther? The S should be on the act and not the Terrorist. Are we to be protected from our terrorists act or from terrorist acts? The botch verifies the article as a government release however, I think, sometimes.

 

[SLM]

"The Protection of Canada from Terrorists Act is just the first step in our efforts to do that."

There's something wrong with that sentence aint ther? The S should be on the act and not the Terrorist.

Why would you want to pluralize Act? How many pieces of legislation do you want.

Are we to be protected from our terrorists act or from terrorist acts?

From terrorists. Period.

The botch verifies the article as a government release however, I think, sometimes.

Or just by people who realize that Act refers to the legislation and not the behaviour of terrorists.

 

[CDNBear]

That was very sweet of you.

 

[SLM]

That was very sweet of you.

I can be a sweet girl.

 

[petros]

I can't.

 

[CDNBear]

Me neither, but I've tasted one.

 

[SLM]

I can't.

Can't or won't?

 

[petros]

One is never enough.

Can't or won't?

Guess.

 

[SLM]

One is never enough.



Guess.

Won't.

 

[damngrumpy]

ISIS is the new religious fascism that is running rampant and we wait for something to happen
I don't think these people realize the sh*t kicking they'll get when we have finished playing our
games on X Box or whatever it is. Its like Nelson finishing his game of whatever and then going
and dismantling the Spanish Armada.
Me thinks they should tread carefully at some point the world will wake up and wham.
The saying is "He who rides the back of the Tiger ultimately ends up inside"