Is Fukushima About to Blow?

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Now how did it go ah er duck, roll and shiver, nope, duck roll and cover your eyes, nope, duck roll and disintegrate yeah that's it. high fives everyone. Tax relief on the in coming tides eh.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
This is a long read.
Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable cover-up | Hatrick Penry UNBOUND
(in part)
Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world’s largest, provable cover-up

Part 1
Plume-Gate: the world’s largest, provable cover-up and conspiracy
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
JFK from his “President and the Press” speech to the U.S. press core on April 27th, 1961
Historically speaking, Plume-Gate is the world’s largest, provable, cover-up and conspiracy. If the Guinness Book of World Records considered ‘cover-up and conspiracy’ as a legitimate category, then certainly Plume-Gate would be at the very top of the list…above 9/11, above Watergate, above Fast and Furious, above even the JFK assassination, and not just for the sheer size and scope of the conspiracy, not because of the many alphabet agencies involved, not because President Obama is implicated, not because it reveals the truth about nuclear power and everything that goes with it, but because Plume-Gate is PROVABLE. And that proof is available to the public in the form of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Freedom of Information documents. The simple fact is: all one needs is the desire to know and the ability to read to familiarize oneself with this grandiose cover-up.
(below) From the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents: Coincidence theorists are abuzz about this email that proves the NRC and Japanese “Utility Execs” were conducting a ”Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Drill” as the March 11th, 2011 disaster unfolded.

Now I ask you, my fellow Americans: what does it mean that 2-1/2 years after the Fukushima catastrophe that I seem to be the only English writing journalist reporting on the world’s largest, provable cover-up and conspiracy?
I tell you it is a testament to our government’s ability to suppress information.
Furthermore, I cannot stress enough that Plume-Gate is the ‘silver bullet’ we have waited so long for. It reveals the truth about nuclear power. It reveals the truth about the conspiracy of which John F. Kennedy spoke of. It is an opportunity we dare not waste and it rides on the lives of all who have died and all who will die from Fukushima.
I ask the parents of America, how much do you love your children? Do you love them enough to protect them from an immediate danger, a biting dog or perhaps a kidnapper? Of course you do. But then I must ask: why more do not join the fight to shut down nuclear power? Is it because the danger is an unseen one? Is it because the danger is too great? Is it because the fight is too time consuming? Do they not understand the grave threat of nuclear power? Do they not know about the fallout from Plume-Gate and its consequences?
I say again it is clear to me that information is being suppressed on a scale never before known in the United States of America. The general public simply does not know the facts.
I put it to you now, that when life-saving information is withheld from the public, in an orchestrated fashion, by agencies of our government, corporate entities and the media, that this is disloyalty to our country and our citizens: IT IS TREASON!
“It took National Geographic, so-called scientists, it took them 880 days to report what an old plasterer reported on in 12 hours.” ~Kevin Blanch (YouTube vlogger, anti-nuclear activist and leukemia survivor)
Allow me too summarize what I have learned thus far from reading the NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Fukushima:
1) The damage to the Fukushima Daiichi facility was much greater and the ability to respond was much more difficult than we have been led to believe. There is a reference to a 46 foot tsunami, the height of which was measured by TEPCO on the walls of Unit’s 1 and 2. There is evidence SFP #4 went dry and had a ‘zirc fire’. At times, dose rates at the facility were lethal or near lethal and as such workers were, at times, unable and unwilling to make repairs. There is talk of 450-600 REM/hr between Unit’s 2 and 3 and MOX sludge causing access problems. Bulldozers were used to push rubble into piles to reduce the dose rates. Engineers and workers were unable to follow protocol as there was/is no known procedure that will rectify a prolonged station blackout due to saltwater inundation of switch boards, circuitry, electrical components, diesel generators etc. from a tsunami. The force of the wave dislodged and damaged the diesel fuel tanks that held the fuel that would have powered back-up generators and when the diesel generators themselves were not damaged from being submerged, the control panels that operated them were. The water-cannons and helicopter water drops were marginally effective and did little to cut dose rates. In the end, it all came down to shipping the Bechtel pumps from Perth, Australia…hooking them up and pumping (in most cases) saltwater into the reactors. DOD foot the bill on the Bechtel pumps which means John Q. Taxpayer actually covered the cost…approximately 9.8 billion dollars. It was at least two weeks before power began to be restored to any significant level in what can only be described as a slow, painstaking effort. There is proof of multiple radioactive plumes being emitted from the Fukushima facility…some well into the month of April, 2011. There is discussion that NOAA tracked a 19 mile radioactive cloud along the Japanese coast. There are TEPCO maps of measured (not modeled) plumes, some of which are over 60 kilometers long.
(below) From the NRC FOIA documents: March 13th, 2011…an excerpt from the Eliot Brenner memo to NRC OPA staffers:

2) The world’s largest, provable cover-up is indicated in the NRC FOIA documents. Some of the agencies/figureheads implicated are: NRC, DOE, EPA, CDC, HHS, DHS, FEMA, NOAA, USAID, DOD (Navy, Naval reactors), White House, President Obama, Bechtel, GE, IAEA, INPO, NEI, and others in an orchestrated attempt to downplay and conceal the radioactive plume and fallout from Americans. Documents, plume models and SitReps (situation report) were denied to China, US states and global ‘stakeholders’. NEI and the ‘Federal Family’ had a password protected database for US Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) ‘rooftop grabs’. Information was suppressed by use of prefabricated ‘talking points’, Questions and Answers and Press Releases. NRC spends millions to search for negative press and to actively and aggressively perform countermeasures in the form of disinformation and careful gatekeeping by their agents (bloggers) online, on TV or in print (i.e.; we know them as trolls and shills). In one memo Eliot Brenner states (in regards to the NRC press release): ‘while we know more than what these say, we’re sticking to this story for now’. There is evidence of subversion of the Freedom of Information Act by the NRC. There is evidence that plume and fallout models were based on 96 hours or 4-5 days of emissions and there is proof that emissions continued up to the end of March and beyond. Officials did NOT issue rainwater warnings or ANY warnings based on these models. There is talk of modeling fallout in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Midway. Conservative estimates ranged around 4.5 REM to children in a transpacific model. There was plenty of discussion of a ‘President’s worst case’ scenario…it was also based on 4-5 days of emissions. There is discussion about having the benefit of knowing all about Chernobyl even modeling based on Chernobyl depositions. FEMA was told to ‘stand down’. There is concern about a ‘diverging perspective’ and discussions about staying ‘aligned’.
3) It is obvious by the level of importance that the NRC, Japanese authorities and others placed on Potassium Iodine (KI) throughout the FOIA documents that it is a very important part of protecting oneself from fallout following a meltdown. This contradicts what US authorities have led us to believe over the years…that KI is not that big of a deal. I am not aware of any requirement that US NPPs must stock KI in case of an accident.
4) There is evidence that ships from the US Navy were not relocated but that officials knew there were plumes and high levels of radiation all around the coast of Japan. NOAA tracked a 19 mile long radioactive cloud along the coast of Japan and on at least two occasions TEPCO measured (not modeled) radioactive plumes over 60 kilometers long. NRC officials state that most of the emissions blew offshore.

5) The NRC’s response to nuclear catastrophe is inhibited, in particular the ability to speak freely and communicate openly, because participants know they are being recorded and email saved for the Freedom of Information Act. In many cases participants were not at liberty to discuss the extent of the meltdowns as they really were. There is evidence of a ‘non-recorded’ line.
6) President Obama called for a review of our domestic fleet of reactors but to my knowledge no action is taken to rectify any of several critical issues. There are emails that indicate we have many non-seismically qualified spent fuel pools here in the US and that our nuclear plants may not be able to withstand a co-event 8.9 earthquake with a 46 foot tall tsunami (or tsunami of that height alone). NRC official admits that GI-99 manual proves they do not know everything about the seismicity of the CEUS, thus East Coast NPPs are vulnerable to a significant earthquake.
7) TEPCO intentionally discharged radioactive water into the Pacific beginning in March of 2011 and there is abundant proof of this in the NRC FOIA documents. Interestingly enough, I reported this fact before mainstream media did.
Part 2



Chapters
Part 1
Plume-Gate: the world’s largest, provable cover-up and conspiracy
Part 2
Something Wicked This Way Comes
Part 3
The Cover-Up
Part 4
Fear and Loathing on Fukushima Unit 4
Part 5
Appendix of other important findings from the NRC FOIA documents
Part 6
References
Part 7
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
If I were ___ and set off an H nuke in the Marianas trench would the reverberations of the S waves created by the intense overpressures of the blast at extreme depth and pressure be amplified to the point it allowed the subductiing Pacific Plate to drop the Island Arc of Japan by 10m and lift the Forearc and Accreationary prism to create the devastating tsunami?

The Marianas Trench gets really really close to Japan at one point. Who would notice the isotopes of the bomb if there was a meltdown on the island?
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Fukushima Fallout ~Alarming Levels of Radiation Allowed in US Food! (15 Feb 2014) | InvestmentWatch

We all know that the radiation from the stricken Fukushima plant has spread around the globe and is poisoning people worldwide. We all know that the West Coast of the United States is being polluted with radioactive debris and that the oceans, the beaches that border them, and even the air is becoming more polluted by radioactivity as time goes on.
You have to ask yourself why the government won’t admit this. It’s not like a disaster half a world away is their fault, is it?

Why the Obama Administration Will Not Admit that Fukushima Radiation is Poisoning Americans | Global Research
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
The amount of ignorance over Fukushima and radiation risk from nuclear power in general is simply amazing.

The radiation released from Fukushima to date is about equal to 1/4 of that from one coal power plant in a year.

The Fukushima Radiation Leak Is Equal To 76 Million Bananas - Forbes

And why we really shouldn’t worry about it all that much. The radiation that fossil fuel plants spew into the environment each year is around 0.1 EBq. That’s ExaBecquerel, or 10 to the power of 18. Fukushima is pumping out 10 trillion becquerels a year at present. Or 10 TBq, or 10 of 10 to the power of 12. Or, if you prefer, one ten thousandth of the amount that the world’s coal plants are doing. Or even, given that there are only about 2,500 coal plants in the world, Fukushima is, in this disaster, pumping out around one quarter of the radiation that a coal plant does in normal operation.

Everything is radioactive including people, if you're paranoid about any exposure then stay away from other people, except that won't stop it as an average sized person has thousands of particles of ionizing radiation released inside them each second.

Are Our Bodies Radioactive?

Potassium-40 (40K) is the primary source of radiation from the human body for two reasons. First, the 40K concentration in the body is fairly high. Potassium is ingested in many foods that we eat and is a critically important element for proper functioning of the human body; it is present in pretty much all the tissues of the body. The amount of the radioactive isotope 40K in a 70-kg person is about 5,000 Bq, which represents 5,000 atoms undergoing radioactive decay each second.

Second, 40K emits gamma rays in a little over 10 percent of its decays and most of these gamma rays escape the body. A gamma ray is emitted in about one out of every 10 disintegrations of 40K, implying that about 500 gamma rays are produced each second. These will be moving in all directions, some will be attenuated in the body, and the dose rate from these gamma rays outside of the individual's body will represent a very small fraction of the normal background dose rate from all natural sources outside the body.

There's good evidence that within certain limits exposure to certain kinds of ionizing radiation has a positive health effect.

http://www.probeinternational.org/low-dose-NSWS-shipyard.pdf

The NSWS is the world’s largest and most rigorously controlled study of radiation
workers. Significantly lower total mortality was observed in both groups of nuclear
workers. Significantly lower mortality from all causes was observed among the cohort of
nuclear workers who were exposed to an average dose rate of 7.59 mGy y–1 and median
dose rate of 2.80 mGy y–1 than among unexposed controls. In addition, the cohort had
significantly reduced mortality for all cardiovascular disease, arteriosclerotic heart
disease, respiratory diseases and cancer. This significantly lower mortality contradicts the
linear non-threshold (LNT) model of radiation risk.

Radiation hormesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guess what's in the water of a lot of those spas that people have been using for treatment since ancient times...radium and radon which can act to reduce inflamation, probably by stimulating the immune system.

People like Gundersen, Caldicott and even Suzuki don't know what they're talking about when they claim that Fukushima presents a global or even local threat of catastrophe. Gundersen claims that one million people will get cancer in Japan as the result of the accident which is a little like saying that one million people will get cancer from eating 76 million bananas which have large amounts of K-40.

Granite also has large amounts of natural uranium and thorium, New York's Grand Central Station and the US Congress have radiation levels higher than the exclusion zone around Chernobyl. Brazil nuts have about 1,000 times the amount of radium as other foods and the list goes on.

Here's a comprehensive fact sheet on radiation by Dr. Robert Hargraves.

https://sites.google.com/site/radiationsafetylimits/
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,965
547
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
Does anyone know where I can access a list of the casualties caused by this event?

No?

That's because there isn't one-there have been no radiation caused casualties it's all a load of idiotic bull from the usual chicken littles.