Ignatieff to change ad after Harper misquoted

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
what I liked about the conservative ad about Iggy, it was short, and focused, and left the viewer to decide what to think

the liberal ads attacking the conservatives were full lies that are spelled out in a way that you can tell the author believes that they can tell the viewer what to think. It shows how smug the Liberals are.
 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
Didn't Jack say he was going to hire a whole bunch of doctors from places like Hong Kong in the first 100 days of his Minority government? I can apreciate what he is trying to do, but that is hardly a big picture solution to a big problem.
:)
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Didn't Jack say he was going to hire a whole bunch of doctors from places like Hong Kong in the first 100 days of his Minority government? I can apreciate what he is trying to do, but that is hardly a big picture solution to a big problem.
:)

Goog Gawd no! We can't have Canadian PM's actually looking out for Canadians and their health. Better to find ways into their wallets....
 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
Goog Gawd no! We can't have Canadian PM's actually looking out for Canadians and their health. Better to find ways into their wallets....

Better to find ways for people's wallets to grow, then there are many options available.
 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
A difficult task when good-paying jobs get traded for ones at call centres and McDonalds

that reminds me of a smug response from the Cretien dynasty. Someone accused them of allowing $20/hr jobs to go to mexico where the new workers would be paid $1/hr.........you know what the smug basT@rd liberal said? "It's not our mandate to protect $1/hr jobs" If I could have reached through that TV set, I would have punched his lights out.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
56
Oshawa
that reminds me of a smug response from the Cretien dynasty. Someone accused them of allowing $20/hr jobs to go to mexico where the new workers would be paid $1/hr.........you know what the smug basT@rd liberal said? "It's not our mandate to protect $1/hr jobs" If I could have reached through that TV set, I would have punched his lights out.


What con is protecting our well paying jobs?
 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
What con is protecting our well paying jobs?

wrong question, you should be asking what will happen to about 200,000 jobs if the liberals raise taxes and impedes the economic recover that is already taking place
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
56
Oshawa
wrong question, you should be asking what will happen to about 200,000 jobs if the liberals raise taxes and impedes the economic recover that is already taking place

Can't answer it eh?

I'll ask it again.

What is lil Steve gonna do to protect Canadian jobs from markets like China and India.


 

cranky

Time Out
Apr 17, 2011
1,312
0
36
To the folk who lose out? Yes. I hear Harper harp about the jobs that will be gone but he can't seem to name names either.....

not true, during the english debates he named several independant financial sources and associations that all warn against raising taxes