What's that got to do with the price of bread?
Just answer the question... yes or no?
By you dodging the question, I'm going to assume you have.. which means you have Gay tendencies.
Last edited:
What's that got to do with the price of bread?
The only thing I think is weird and complete bonkers is that you are worried about what happens in other peoples bedrooms...
Marriage has nothing to do with bedrooms.
But I guess that isn't signaling enough virtue for you.
A man being married to 25 women is illegal - yet a man marrying a man now isn't. What strange times we live in.
A man being married to 25 women is illegal - yet a man marrying a man now isn't. What strange times we live in.
Any man that has 25 wives is being punished enough.
The only thing I think is weird and complete bonkers is that you are worried about what happens in other peoples bedrooms..
I could care less if a couple wants to go 50 shades of grey on each other, or **** each other in the ass.. have you ever had anal sex with a women Blackleaf..
Our esteemed leaders have brought the bedroom to the classroom granting the queer lobby access to preach the 'joys' of alternate sexual relations to our kids.
Anal sex with a woman.... where does that fit in the LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA index?
You grew up when kids were pawns on the straight chess board.If only..... I sorta think most folks feel it's none of their business and don't give a rats as_ about what goes on in the privacy of bedrooms if only it stayed there. Our esteemed leaders have brought the bedroom to the classroom granting the queer lobby access to preach the 'joys' of alternate sexual relations to our kids. Thank gawd I grew up when kids were allowed to be kids not simply pawns on the queer chess board.
An asshole has no sex.
Exactly so no response can be expected no matter how valiant the effort on the part of the party of the first part, what a bummer.
You grew up when kids were pawns on the straight chess board.
Not at all our parents were allowed a voice in our rearing and sex ed was about safe not alternate sex, boring stuff like vd, hygiene, pregnancy and responsibilty.
And Richie and Fonzie went on a double date with two cheerleaders.An asshole has no sex.
Exactly so no response can be expected no matter how valiant the effort on the part of the party of the first part, what a bummer.
You grew up when kids were pawns on the straight chess board.
Not at all our parents were allowed a voice in our rearing and sex ed was about safe not alternate sex, boring stuff like vd, hygiene, pregnancy and responsibilty.
You must be joking. That would be child abuse!Kids' education should reflect the real world they have to live in, not some fantasy land of 1938.
A man being married to 25 women is illegal - yet a man marrying a man now isn't. What strange times we live in.
Sounds like the solution is to make sex with kids illegal, not polygamy.For you, getting even one woman to marry you would be a trial I'm sure, BL, considering you ego and all around dirtbag attitude.
As much as I am on the fence about polygamy in general, in this kind of case I am glad of the conviction. When kids are likely involved, polygamy is just an excuse to 'marry' and rape kids. IMO it's more the religion than the polygamous act really that is the issue, but you get them where you can get them.
As for gay people, wtf does that have to do with polygamy? If they're adults in a relationship, it's the furthest thing from polygamy.
And besides, it depends on what you mean by marriage - the social contract/construct or the religious definition, and then which religion you're talking about because not all religions see or have seen gay marriages as wrong/evil.
Sounds like the solution is to make sex with kids illegal, not polygamy.
What the f*ck are you on about? I said that if you don't want people to have sex with kids, seems the best way to do that is to make it illegal to have sex with kids. Justifying outlawing polygamy by saying it prevents child molestation is like justifying outlawing gay marriage by saying it prevents homosexuality.So do we just legalize it without any limitations or do we at restrict it to at least some degree, be it number of spouses (as is common in all Muslim states for example), allowing the marriage contract to enjoin monogamy (as is common in most marriage contracts in Iran and some other Muslim states), or prohibiting the contracting of a polygamous marriage within our jurisdiction but still acknowledging polygamous marriages that are legally contracted and consummated abroad (as is the case in Tunisia), or something else? Or do we just open the floodgates?
What the f*ck are you on about? I said that if you don't want people to have sex with kids, seems the best way to do that is to make it illegal to have sex with kids. Justifying outlawing polygamy by saying it prevents child molestation is like justifying outlawing gay marriage by saying it prevents homosexuality.
Looks like we are getting off the track of the subject of the OP......................How much money has been squandered?