How Conservatives Feel About Torture

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
CSIS OK'd to share data despite torture risk - Canada - CBC News

A copy of the July 2011 directive — secret until now — was released to The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

The directive is squarely at odds with Canada's international commitments against torture — which have no loopholes, said Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada.

"There's no ifs, ands or buts to that — there's no qualifications," he said. "This is one of the clearest areas of international law."

Looks like Toews likes to leave the door open for extraordinary rendition...
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,288
11,381
113
Low Earth Orbit
As long as tazers are used domestically, torture and torture weapons like tazers will be the status quo.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
This thing is a hairy issue that needs a different outlook. I don't think it should be a wedge issue in which we make a binary decision about whether torture is simply good or bad. What people should be asking themselves is "when is torture necessary" ?

This would help move the discussion along because the answer to that question is not "never", no matter how much the opposition would like to believe it is.

There are circumstances that torture might be necessary in order to extract information that could possibly save lives.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Like what?

Well, let's look at the textbook example of 9/11. Let's say it's Sept. 10th, 2011 and you find out that something big is going to happen tomorrow. One of the members involved in the act has been tipped off and you have him under investigation.

Now, up until this point, let's assume you have clear evidence that something will happen. A witness testimony that has a signed affidavit, for instance. We know something's up, but we don't know exactly who or where.

If the member under investigation is not going to budge and you have time running up, then you might need to coax him into giving up the answer. I would say this is a perfectly plausible situation given that you have enough circumstantial evidence leading up to this point.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,288
11,381
113
Low Earth Orbit
Do you really think somebody who was going to kill themselves anyway would spill the beans if tortured?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
CSIS OK'd to share data despite torture risk - Canada - CBC News



Looks like Toews likes to leave the door open for extraordinary rendition...

Wow........

Now that is a jump.

There is never an excuse for torture. Never.

Now that we have that clear, Canada does not support torture. The Conservative gov't has merely issued an order to CSIS allowing the use of information that MAY have been gained by torture IF the safety of Canadians is at risk. Or they may provide information to questionable countries under the same requirement.

That is only common sense.

If Amnesty International ruled, we would be all under the thumb of Islam in a week.

International Law is a joke........every nation on earth ignores it at the slightest indication that it conflicts with their national interest.

The sharing of information to save Canadian lives is NOT extraordinary rendition.

You totally discredit a perfectly sensible position when you go over the top like that..................

Do you really think somebody who was going to kill themselves anyway would spill the beans if tortured?

Yes. A quick flash is a whole lot different that days, weeks of terror and pain.

I also think information gained under torture is unreliable at best.

Well, let's look at the textbook example of 9/11. Let's say it's Sept. 10th, 2011 and you find out that something big is going to happen tomorrow. One of the members involved in the act has been tipped off and you have him under investigation.

Now, up until this point, let's assume you have clear evidence that something will happen. A witness testimony that has a signed affidavit, for instance. We know something's up, but we don't know exactly who or where.

If the member under investigation is not going to budge and you have time running up, then you might need to coax him into giving up the answer. I would say this is a perfectly plausible situation given that you have enough circumstantial evidence leading up to this point.

Torture is never acceptable.......even in the situation you propose.......
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Wow........

Now that is a jump.

There is never an excuse for torture. Never.

Now that we have that clear, Canada does not support torture. The Conservative gov't has merely issued an order to CSIS allowing the use of information that MAY have been gained by torture IF the safety of Canadians is at risk. Or they may provide information to questionable countries under the same requirement.

The flavouring of this rhetoric is a bit flawed.

You agree with me that torture may be used IF the safety of Canadians is at risk - and yes, I agree!

However, you cannot make this statement after condemning the use of torture. It sounds a bit disingenuous to make a staunch statement against torture and then follow it up with an exception for the use of torture.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
There's a bit of logic in this rhetoric.

You agree with me that torture may be used IF the safety of Canadians is at risk - and I agree!

However, you cannot make this statement after condemning the use of torture. It sounds a bit disingenuous to make a staunch statement against torture and then follow it up with an exception for the use of torture.


I agree it is kind of like dancing on the head of a pin.

But what would be intolerable is to get a call from Saudi intelligence saying their interrogation of a suspect has revealed that there is a plan to place a huge car bomb at the Skydome during a game...........and NOT react to it because the info might have been gained under torture. That is the position Amnesty International wants. Crazy.

I gave no exception for the use of torture.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The current social conservative agenda in this country means they torture us just by their
presence in power. They are not only using the crime bill to reshape the country they are
starting to dismantle societies hard won gains that so many fought for and in some cases
died for. We have to concentrate on ousting them from office. Remember a conservative
government is one thing but this is not a conservative government its a hybrid and as
such it does not operate by conservative principles it operates by its own principles as it
goes along.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
The current social conservative agenda in this country means they torture us just by their
presence in power. They are not only using the crime bill to reshape the country they are
starting to dismantle societies hard won gains that so many fought for and in some cases
died for. We have to concentrate on ousting them from office. Remember a conservative
government is one thing but this is not a conservative government its a hybrid and as
such it does not operate by conservative principles it operates by its own principles as it
goes along.


OMG! Have I tripped into the Olympic games: philosophical Long Jump competition???

I think Vanni just slipped into second place....lol
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Colpy, you're all over the place. Swallow your meds and let's stick to torture.

So, I think I understand what you're saying now:

1.) You don't condone the use of torture.
2.) But if another country committed torture, you would allow for us to use the information in an investigation.

Is this correct?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Colpy, you're all over the place. Swallow your meds and let's stick to torture.

So, I think I understand what you're saying now:

1.) You don't condone the use of torture.
2.) But if another country committed torture, you would allow for us to use the information in an investigation.

Is this correct?

Absolutely.....if the investigation was into a situation which would put the lives of Canadians at risk.

Let me turn the question around: Would you ignore information about a potential terrorist attack because it MIGHT have been gained through torture???
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Absolutely.....if the investigation was into a situation which would put the lives of Canadians at risk.

Let me turn the question around: Would you ignore information about a potential terrorist attack because it MIGHT have been gained through torture???

No. We're on the same side on this issue (mostly).

I would actually condone torture completed by us, IF there was credible evidence to show that we could extract information from committing that torture to save lives.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
No. We're on the same side on this issue (mostly).

I would actually condone torture completed by us, IF there was credible evidence to show that we could extract information from committing that torture to save lives.

And suddenly I find myself standing closer to Amnesty International than you.....which I find very amusing.....
:)
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
This thing is a hairy issue that needs a different outlook. I don't think it should be a wedge issue in which we make a binary decision about whether torture is simply good or bad. What people should be asking themselves is "when is torture necessary" ?

This would help move the discussion along because the answer to that question is not "never", no matter how much the opposition would like to believe it is.

There are circumstances that torture might be necessary in order to extract information that could possibly save lives.

I agree. The circumstances would have to be extreme but "never say never". I thought the CSIS directive was reasonable, considering the eventualities it is supposed to address. I also agree with Colpy in what he said about Amnesty International, their reaction and what would happen if we all obeyed their every bleat.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Ok, first I have to state my position that torture is never acceptable and those that use it are barbaric including those that think its ok for others to use it as long as it helps us. This is still wrong, immoral and unethical. I point this directly at you Colpy & MF, you can't have your cake and eat it to. You support torture and you are stuck with that position.

Now please somebody tell me why terrorist activity is a big worry to us in Canada. Can anyone cite an actual terrorist attack on Canadian soil or against one of our embassies. I think there was a couple of kidnappings over the years but those were not really directed at Canada as such. I would say that now our idiotic govt has adopted this position we may start to have to worry. As Harpo and his cronies keep trying to move us farther right than Rush Limbaugh they also move us into the crosshairs of the terrorists.

PS- sorry for the neg rep Grumpy, hit the wrong button on my phone by mistake.
 
Last edited:

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Another one of Vic Toews brilliant ideas.. anyone see a pattern here?? His ancestory is German, what is he the offspring of Hitler?

 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Well, let's look at the textbook example of 9/11. Let's say it's Sept. 10th, 2011 and you find out that something big is going to happen tomorrow....

Now, up until this point, let's assume you have clear evidence that something will happen..... We know something's up.....

That is basically what happened except it was early-mid July when they knew.