but in the absence of evidence in support of some extraordinary claim, and in fact in the face of a good deal of contrary evidence, what sense does it make to believe it's true?
----------------------------------------Dexter Sinister--------------------------------------------------------
You are making the same blur of distinctions, Niflmir has.
In the face of a good deal of contrary evidence ???
What accumulation of evidence ???
The outlandish statements of believers ???
Go ahead and knock down the strawman of outlandish statements of believers.
But is there any accumulated evidence against the existence of God ?
Nope.
Believers and Non-believers look at this wondrous awesome universe and come out
with different conclusions, neither of which constitutes evidence for or against (the
existence of God.)
Disprovable statements by believers is no preponderance of evidence against a God.
But if all the believers make disprovable statements why should we believe in God ?
Poor question, presumptuous of the answer, isn't it ?
First off, most church goers are not as ideologically fierce as the average forum poster
and so MOST believers don't make such disprovable statements nowadays. So historcially
you are correct. But extrapolating if they will be wrong in the future butts up against the
fact that proof or disproof of God still might not be available.
Give us your definition of God, one that is not yours and yours alone, and we will give you the mountain of evidence.