Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump in popular vote passes 2.5 million

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
mentalfloss...

For better or for worse, everyone gets their say on this website. Just be thankful this forum isn't run by the 'popular vote' which you so lovingly endorse. You and Cannuck would have to find another playground.


And maybe take Gerryh with them! :) :) Then the adults might get a chance to talk.

So more people voted for Clinton but Trump will be President interesting for Democracy
I think Trump will destroy himself before the four years is up but the laughingstock of the
world will be America for a long time to come


Don't bet your first born D.G. Trump isn't exactly stupid or suicidal!

So more people voted for Clinton but Trump will be President interesting for Democracy
I think Trump will destroy himself before the four years is up but the laughingstock of the
world will be America for a long time to come


Good to see you back. :)
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
What I've been trying to get across is voter representation is only one criteria. Land area is also important, 3 Colleges votes for Alaska which is about 17.5 % of the total area is also very unfair. What does a person have to do to get this across? Use a f**king sledge hammer?


For a more realistic count just take Calif. out of the equation and then tally up the votes of the other 49 states and see how Sweet little Hillary stands. :) :) :)

were you planning on leaving?


I don't make plans. :) :) :) Gave up that sh*t 18 years ago!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
So more people voted for Clinton but Trump will be President interesting for Democracy
I think Trump will destroy himself before the four years is up but the laughingstock of the
world will be America for a long time to come

Are you making yet ANOTHER prediction?!?!

DG... how many times do you need to be wrong before you figure out you just do not know as much as you think?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I don't know why anyone would give a sh*t about this thread, it means absolutely nothing. I guess Hillary has to grasp at something to brag about. It's like 105 year old man bragging about a 10" dink.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
What I've been trying to get across is voter representation is only one criteria. Land area is also important, 3 Colleges votes for Alaska which is about 17.5 % of the total area is also very unfair. What does a person have to do to get this across? Use a f**king sledge hammer?

With proportional representation you get both.

The person who wins that jurisdiction remains.

You should actually understand what you're talking about before making silly assumptions.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
With proportional representation you get both.

The person who wins that jurisdiction remains.

You should actually understand what you're talking about before making silly assumptions.


Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Alaska has 3 votes, California with half the area has 55.........................I think I know what I'm talking about! :)
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Alaska has 3 votes, California with half the area has 55.........................I think I know what I'm talking about! :)

Canada is bigger than the US.