Oh yeah, I should have added we are talking about going over budget to a cost of 20 billion for Afghanistan when this government made us think to expect 8 billion which is still a huge amount of money for our country.
Oh yeah, I should have added we are talking about going over budget to a cost of 20 billion for Afghanistan when this government made us think to expect 8 billion which is still a huge amount of money for our country.
http://www.foodsafetyfirst.ca/
This doesn't look like good steward ship to me. I just heard on the news its a form of deregulation, deregulating something that is protecting our life doesn't seem like a policy of what I'm looking for in a PM.
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2008/10/07/easter-reaction.html
Thanks for the link Nuggler
This sure looks suspicious, not willing to authorize a judicial inquiry that could go right to the office of the PM.... hmmmmm . But then I can understand him not wanting to authorize a judicial inquiry that could lead to his own office.
Do we really want these types of policies to keep running our economy into the ground.
- hospitals closing down
- lack of proper funding for health care
- false transparency
- loss in production
- deregulation
- improper funding to education and childcare
- cuts to the arts
- etc.
Please provide a link to anywhere that quotes 490 billion. At 490 billion we would be the worlds second largest military power. The US is predicted to spend 500 billion, China and Russia will each be at around 300 billion over 5 years. Canada will spend 19 billion next year increasing 2% per year, so just over 100 billion.Don't forget about his military agenda that will cost us 490 billion dollars over five years, announced June of this year.
Please provide a link to anywhere that quotes 490 billion. At 490 billion we would be the worlds second largest military power. The US is predicted to spend 500 billion, China and Russia will each be at around 300 billion over 5 years. Canada will spend 19 billion next year increasing 2% per year, so just over 100 billion.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
Google is your friend, use it
Please provide a link to anywhere that quotes 490 billion. At 490 billion we would be the worlds second largest military power. The US is predicted to spend 500 billion, China and Russia will each be at around 300 billion over 5 years. Canada will spend 19 billion next year increasing 2% per year, so just over 100 billion.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
Google is your friend, use it
Scratch said 490 billion over 5 years, it's 19 billion next year rising 2% per year, so about 110 billion over 5 years and 490 billion over 20 years sounds close enough.It says here its over 20 years
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/06/20/military-plan.html
Scratch said 490 billion over 5 years, it's 19 billion next year rising 2% per year, so about 110 billion over 5 years and 490 billion over 20 years sounds close enough.
If Dion and Layton still want to send the troops to Sudan right after Afghanistan is done that budget will double, at least. Oh right, we can't talk about that now there's an election and that wouldn't get votes would it.......
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/canadian-politics/71085-buzzword-jack-layton-just-another.html
I can't believe I'm typing this but the Beav is right, It wouldn't of mattered who was in power here in Canada. The failure of the American banking system and then the economy would have had the same effect.
Now its just a matter of who do you feel will pull us through this without hitting our wallets? Harper, Dion, or Layton?
Subsidizing industry and its R & D here in Canada is not the evil Jack Layton makes it out to be. Having our own industry in decent shape and ready to go when the US does recover might give them advantages and get them in markets long before US industry can. This would equal jobs here first. Jack would promise to keep a horse carriage factory open if it meant he'd get a few votes. We can only hope that protectionist policies don't become the trend south of the border and shut us out of where 75% of our export trade ends up. Now that would cause a real disaster for southern Ontario and Quebec.
I can't believe I'm typing this but the Beav is right, It wouldn't of mattered who was in power here in Canada. The failure of the American banking system and then the economy would have had the same effect.
Now its just a matter of who do you feel will pull us through this without hitting our wallets? Harper, Dion, or Layton?
Subsidizing industry and its R & D here in Canada is not the evil Jack Layton makes it out to be. Having our own industry in decent shape and ready to go when the US does recover might give them advantages and get them in markets long before US industry can. This would equal jobs here first. Jack would promise to keep a horse carriage factory open if it meant he'd get a few votes. We can only hope that protectionist policies don't become the trend south of the border and shut us out of where 75% of our export trade ends up. Now that would cause a real disaster for southern Ontario and Quebec.
By David Akin, Canwest News Service
Published: Friday, October 10, 2008
OTTAWA - The Canadian economy, defying all predictions, created a record number of new jobs last month, giving Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives fresh ammunition Friday to make their case that they are the best stewards of Canada's economy.
Statistics Canada said Friday that, in September, the economy created 107,000 new jobs, defying predictions of economists who were expecting only one-tenth as many new jobs.
Statistics Canada said that it has never recorded such a large one-month gain since it first began collecting this data in 1976.
It's not only the crooked government that's misleading us it's also Walter who's passing worthless slugs as gold coins. That CanWest paper is a rag of the rich, real people shouldn't read it or quote it or buy it. It's all the news that isn't fit to print.Yeah and what this government isn't telling us is that 97,000 of those 107,000 new jobs created were part time. So basically while we had a record number of job losses (largest number of job losses in 17 years) with the more beneficial incomes in the manufacturing sector being lost, this Harper government is touting numbers regarding people having to get part time work to now make ends meet.
What a joke. A sad joke on us. This government only knows how to mislead. And you know what else about people working part time? Companies don't have to pay those people the benefits a person would get if they were getting full time work.
Makes us all really proud doesn't it?
.