For the second time in the Gazan conflict, the Trudeau government immediately jumped on Hamas reports that Israel was intentionally targeting civilians, only for evidence to emerge that the terrorist group may not have been telling the full truth.
The incident in question occurred Sunday night when a large explosion and fire was recorded at an encampment housing Palestinians refugees near the city of Rafah.
View attachment 22268
The Hamas-affiliated health ministry in Gaza, Gaza civil defence agency and Gaza media office
all reported the explosion as the result of an intentional Israeli strike on a marked refugee area. Hamas’s military wing called it a “Zionist massacre of civilians,” and used it as justification for launching a barrage of rockets into Israel.
Twice, the Trudeau government has endorsed false Hamas claims that Israel was intentionally targeting civilians
apple.news
It was these initial reports that drove media accounts of the explosion as being the aftermath of an “Israeli strike on Rafah camp,” in
the words of the Washington Post.
They also drove official Canadian pleas for an immediate end to the Israeli operation.
“We are horrified by strikes that killed Palestinian civilians in Rafah,”
was the response of Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly, who then demanded an “immediate ceasefire.”
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh even went so far as to call the Rafah explosion evidence of “genocide,” and called for Canadian sanctions on Israel and seemed to imply that Canada, by saying Canada should back the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court, should support the attempt of an International Criminal Court prosecutor to have
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested, etc…
The immediate response of Israeli authorities was to call the refugee camp fires an accident. Netanyahu called it a “tragic mishap” and an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesman called it a “devastating incident, which we did not expect.”
The IDF did strike a compound in the area on Sunday night, killing Hamas commanders Yassin Rabia and Khaled Najjar.
On Tuesday, the IDF
released a satellite image asserting that the target they struck was “a closed structure away from the tent area.” According to the image, it was roughly 180 meters from the Al-Mawasi Humanitarian Area, in which the fires occurred and civilians were killed.
Download aplikasi berita TribunX di Play Store atau App Store untuk dapatkan pengalaman baruTRIBUN-VIDEO.COM - Israel mendapat kecaman dari Internasional set...
www.youtube.com
View attachment 22269
In an English-language press conference, the IDF said the strike had been carried out with precision munitions that would not have been able to generate the level of damage seen in videos of the camp that night.
This was backed up by CNN analysis published on Wednesday, which
identified the remnants of a GBU-39 small diameter bombs at the site. Made by Boeing, it’s
explicitly marketed as a “precision-strike” weapon that minimizes “collateral damage.”
It was pretty scary for the firefighters. They thought I was storing….ammunition….anyway…
Rear-Adm. Daniel Hagari, chief military spokesman for the IDF,
said Tuesday that the damage to the camp was the result of “secondary explosions,” possibly from unknown weapons caches ignited by the strike.
Official Israeli sources say the secondary explosions theory is backed up by videos of the fire taken by Gazan civilians, which show multiple blasts following the initial strike.
In one widely circulated video, a narrator
can be heard speculating in Arabic that the fire was due to a strike on “a vehicle filled with ammo and weapons.”
Canada’s response to the whole saga was very similar to the Trudeau government’s official reaction to an Oct. 17 explosion in the courtyard of the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City, etc…
At that time, Joly jumped on initial media accounts — derived from Hamas-affiliated reports — that the explosion was the result of an intentional Israeli strike.
“Bombing a hospital is an unthinkable act, and there is no doubt that doing so is absolutely illegal,” she wrote in a post to X.com.
Soon after, analysis by Israel, the U.S. and multiple conflict watchers concluded that the explosion had
almost certainly been the result of a misfired Palestinian rocket that had been intended for Israel. What’s more, Hamas accounts that the explosion had killed more than 500 were found to be wildly overblown, etc…