That Thabet would exagerate his credentials or allow people to believe he is young, daring and handsome doesn't prove his video was doctored.
Agreed. Why do you keep bringing that up? Trying to create the impression that that's the only suspicious detail?
Your reference is not objective and spins the facts to make it sound like delays in breaking this story in US, Thabet's embellishments of his qualifications prove the Haditha massacre didn't happen.
There you go again. Yes, that site is not objective, but they're not out of the blue either. They pose reasonable questions and cite their sources. They're biased, but not whack.
Its a fact that no one has proven the Haditha video was manufactured, and you can bet its been scrutinized closely.
Has it? You can bet on that, I won't be. Is the video available? All I've seen are blurry captures, usually with the bodies covered up or obstructed by someone standing over or in front.
Again, forensics 101....wouldn't the coroner photograph the wounds? If not, why didn't he? Why is a blurry video by a journalism student the only photographic evidence of a massacre?
The initial US military version of events was a deliberate attempt to hide this atrocity. Subsequent versions are a whitewash of what happened. The legal technicality which ended the trial was probably deliberate. The prosecution could try the case again, but likely they won't, because they have no interest in justice when it comes to US soldiers committing crimes in Iraq.
Maybe. Maybe not.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/budding-journalist-sat-on-haditha-tape