Gun Control is Completely Useless.

[JamesBondo]

And one time, CurCdn was at band camp ...

 

[Curious Cdn]

And one time, CurCdn was at band camp ...

I was, was I? Is that where they teach you to stand watches in engine rooms?

What the feck are you? One of those Sons of Odin poseurs patrolling with your "guns"?

 

[Danbones]

Standing watches...?

Are you sure you don't mean those things called clocks?

 

[MHz]

Da:4:17:
This matter is by the decree of the watchers,
and the demand by the word of the holy ones:
to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men,
and giveth it to whomsoever he will,
and setteth up over it the basest of men.

 

[pgs]

Yeah.


Here in Saint John as well. Including visiting a local brothel.

Is that what we call cat houses ?

 

[Colpy]

Is that what we call cat houses ?

Pussy Palace, yep.


Guess the hookers weren't real patriotic.

 

[MHz]

Is that what we call cat houses ?

What would a 'scratch pole' be there??

 

[MHz]

Pussy Palace, yep.
Guess the hookers weren't real patriotic.

They won the 1812 War for Canada, them and good moonshine and long cold nights.

 

[spilledthebeer]

They won the 1812 War for Canada, them and good moonshine and long cold nights.

WHAT ARE THE ODDS..........................................


that MHz could ever coherently explain the political...............................................


or military relationship between War of 1812................................................


and Nazis coming ashore in 1942??????????????????????????????????


I suggest the odds ARE LOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


MHz PROVES that LSD and radical Muslim religious fervour produce nonsense answers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


To pretty much everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[B00Mer]

 

[Curious Cdn]

We don't have a right to bear arms. It is a privilege granted by the Crown.

 

[Colpy]

We don't have a right to bear arms. It is a privilege granted by the Crown.

WRONG!



It is a constitutional right recognized in the Bill of Rights of 1689, part of our constitutional framework.


In fact, exactly the opposite of your contention is true.


The royal signature on the Bill of Rights of 1689 was a condition of William of Orange taking the throne after the Great Revolution.


It was the people forcing the Crown to recognize their rights.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

That's in the rulebook?

 

[B00Mer]

That's in the rulebook?

http://www.lowe.ca/Rick/FirearmsLegislation/RightToArms.htm

 

[Colpy]

That's in the rulebook?

Most certainly is.....a limited right, but a right, not a privilege, and specifically for self defense.

And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs and cinque ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them as were of right to be sent to Parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January in this year one thousand six hundred eighty and eight [old style date], in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted, upon which letters elections having been accordingly made;


And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare


................



That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;

 

[Hoid]

"That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;"

you might want to trim this off the end it pretty much discredits the whole lie you're telling

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

"That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;"
you might want to trim this off the end it pretty much discredits the whole lie you're telling

Well, ya gotta keep them bad people in their place. You know, Muzzies. And Jooz. And Caflicks.

 

[Hoid]

"...as allowed by law" means law can prohibit

 

[Colpy]

Well, ya gotta keep them bad people in their place. You know, Muzzies. And Jooz. And Caflicks.

....except that all rights were extended to Catholics etc. in (I believe) 1825.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

....except that all rights were extended to Catholics etc. in (I believe) 1825.

Nope. Check the Settlement Act. And Catholic Emancipation in Ireland.