B*tch had it comin'.a Beowulf?
YOU SHOT GRENDEL'S MOTHER?!
B*tch had it comin'.a Beowulf?
YOU SHOT GRENDEL'S MOTHER?!
Cuz they're cute and fluffy?why would a scarborough investigator give a damn about rabbits is saskatchewan?
It's legal for a kid to take a machine gun to school in Canada?"A farmer needs to shoot rabbits in Saskatchewan" should not be the answer to the question "why should a kid in Scarborough be allowed to take a machine gun to school?"
Does "me" count?Just wondering; how many on here have had a friend or family member shot,
Thought? No. Knew? Yabetcha.and how many have thought they were saved by brandishing a gun?
Does "me" count?Does "me" count?
Thought? No. Knew? Yabetcha.
Course, I'm American.
Ah, very clever.Does "me" count?
Not for much if that's the whole conversation.
Watch out he might put you on ignore . Lol .Ah, very clever.
Y'all have a real nice evening now, hear?
It's legal for a kid to take a machine gun to school in Canada?
Wow, you people aren't nearly as boring as you seem!
That was cute , I almost feel like renewing my National Geographic sugscription .
That was cute , I almost feel like renewing my National Geographic sugscription .
wow!That was cute , I almost feel like renewing my National Geographic sugscription .
also traffic laws have no effect on accident rates.
all those speed limits only inconvenience the law-abiding while the criminals are free to drive as fast as they want.
I design and manufacture various security devices for a living and we often use the old adage that "locks keep out honest people" as determined professional thieves will overcome anything that we do. If we removed the locks, though, we would find that they also keep out the stupid ones, as well who seem to constitute the majority of the criminal community. Therefore the locks are still required."speed limits only inconvenience the law-abiding"
The word "only" is often used very inappropriately. Nearly every law, tax, activity or incident has more than one consequence; often several both desirable and not. Declaring there's "only" one is usually completely untrue.
I design and manufacture various security devices for a living and we often use the old adage that "locks keep out honest people" as determined professional thieves will overcome anything that we do. If we removed the locks, though, we would find that they also keep out the stupid ones, as well who seem to constitute the majority of the criminal community. Therefore the locks are still required.
Gun controls are needed to separate the stupid ones from the loaded Glocks under their pillows.