.... in those particular places yes, but localized weather does not equal global climate.
Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
- Status
One thing for sure... Prof. Knucklheads post count is climbing. That is a trend that says he is getting hot under the collar. At least something is warming.
So how did the moisture make it high enough into the atmosphere to fall as snow without extra heat to lift it over Saudi Arabia?
Well how else could it reach the arctic?... Now, about this GLOBAL thing. What has it to do with San Diego?
Last edited:
I am really supposed to provide you with another chart Prof. Lamebrain?
Did you read the data? Of course not.
Prove the chart wrong.
It's not my chart. If you are bringing half a data set and calling it proof and you are expecting me to do what you failed to do that is not my problem. Find the full data set and we'll talk.
So basically a Scientist (not me) has presented facts that a faux scientist has disagreed with. Because he disagrees the faux scientist says...
"Go get more... I am not going to disprove it myself because I am unable."
The chart is undeniable and you cannot disprove it. Don't expect me to do your work.
You FAIL!
Sure it is on the globe ... but it is not the globe ... neither is a routine January thaw in Saskatchewan. Weather patterns have spikes - highs and lows ... just like that graph that troubles you so. Yes ... we are in a period of global warming. There have been many before we got here, before there was life on this planet, and will be long after we are gone. Can you do something to stop the tides ... or the sun from shining from a direction it never used to when I was a kid?
Last edited:
WTF are you on about? Shouldn't you be in the thread about pot smoking?
Look, professor: weather is the atmospheric condition occurring in a local area over a short period of time. For instance; the rain on the plain in Spain that day is a weather phenomena.
Climate is the atmospheric condition over a large area and a long period of time. For example: humid is a type of climate.
Well said! WELL SAID!
BRAVO!
Common sense. Everyone knows there is a warming trend but environmentalist have seized the opportunity to extort money from corporations. They want money, plain and simple. It has gone way beyond science now... way beyond scientists. This is a Green Political Issue now... of biblical proportions. Bigger than the "Save the Seals" and "No More Nukes" issues. The venom that comes from these folks is astounding! I got to hand it to them...it was a passionate movement. However it is dying out.
What do you think the chart will say with a full set of data? Did you find it but are too embarassed to post it or what? If you want to walk the walk of a scientist then you best be packing a full and complete data set before trying to prove anything wrong.
That Chart by HH Lamb ends in 1982....please provide the data from 1982 to present. If you are the one trying to prove scince wrong it is you who must provide data that opposes the consensus not the other way around. So are you going to prsent your case with fully data or not?
I have a chart, too. if one reads the little black marks at the edges of the graph, it is understandable.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif
So it shows lines that wiggle up and down, but the general tren of the lines is upward. This means that the temperature goes up, just like the red alcohol in the thermometer.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif
So it shows lines that wiggle up and down, but the general tren of the lines is upward. This means that the temperature goes up, just like the red alcohol in the thermometer.
That's quite the change since the chart posted earlier from 27 years ago isn't it? We'd be great shape if it were 1982 but it's not 1982.
- Status