Gay Rights And The Bible

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"He is an authority on financial mismanagement, his University (modestly named Oral Roberts University) has been involved in many financial scandals, with embezzlement, bribery etc.

I remember a few years ago he was raising money for some mega project, some church or a mansion for himself, I don’t’ remember. He came up 5 million dollars short. He said on his show that if he doesn’t’ get those 5 million dollars; God is going to call him back to Heaven.

And it worked, one of his fans forked over the 5 million dollars."

Change a few words here and there and sounds EXACTLY like the Obama Presidential Campaign.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Reading His book is now considered kissing ass? If you god can do nothing then there is no god in your world, what part of that do you not understand.

How is reading a book going to get anyone into heaven? Expecting a reward for doing something as inane as reading a book (that is known to be fraudulent) and running around on forums telling people how wrong they are to believe in anything other than your interpretation of said fraudulent book, is ass kissing. What else would I call it?
 

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
Reading His book is now considered kissing ass? If you god can do nothing then there is no god in your world, what part of that do you not understand.

How is reading a book going to get anyone into heaven? Expecting a reward for doing something as inane as reading a book (that is known to be fraudulent) and running around on forums telling people how wrong they are to believe in anything other than your interpretation of said fraudulent book, is ass kissing. What else would I call it?
umm divine ass kissing? 8O
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
How is reading a book going to get anyone into heaven?
I doubt that it will, you and Dex have read parts of it and you certainly wouldn't qualify, just based on the first of two Laws. Without reading how could you even come up with the concept of Heaven. I certainly didn't teach you that, nor anything else. You concepts are just the way they were before I posted my first post that you read.

Expecting a reward for doing something as inane as reading a book (that is known to be fraudulent) and running around on forums telling people how wrong they are to believe in anything other than your interpretation of said fraudulent book, is ass kissing.
What forums are you referencing, this one? Who cares if you believe the Bible says the same things that I say it does. Why would they be the same, you are a non-believer, as are most that post on the 'God themed' threads on this forum. That is somewhat weird in itself, is it your mission to convert others to your POV? There can be no other reason unless you just like trolling.
You like to call God fake, the Bible fake, all based on your personal opinion of those two matters. Only somebody totally incapable of independent thought would fall for that.
On top of that you don't even understand what was written.

What else would I call it?
Cliffy's attempt to not feel lonely and left out. If God isn't part of your life stay off the God themed threads. Why can you not come up with that answer and then follow through on it?
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
He is an authority on financial mismanagement, his University (modestly named Oral Roberts University) has been involved in many financial scandals, with embezzlement, bribery etc.

I remember a few years ago he was raising money for some mega project, some church or a mansion for himself, I don’t’ remember. He came up 5 million dollars short. He said on his show that if he doesn’t’ get those 5 million dollars; God is going to call him back to Heaven.

And it worked, one of his fans forked over the 5 million dollars.

How do you know God himself did not send the 5 million SJP :lol:
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It appears MHZ is the only one still convinced that homosexuality was the problem in Sodom & Gomorrah.
I would not go so far as to say that perveted mating practices were their only short coming.
Where do you think the term sodomy came from?

Answer the question I posed to you, what does 'know them' mean in the context of those two verses I posted. Step right up, be a brave soul and just answer that question.

Nor am I the only one that relates sodomy to that place in the Bible.

sodomy

One entry found


Main Entry:sod·omy Pronunciation: \ˈsä-də-mē\ Function:noun Etymology:Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Genesis 19:1–11Date:13th century : anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex ; also : copulation with an animal
— sod·om·it·ic \ˌsä-də-ˈmi-tik\ or sod·om·it·i·cal \-ti-kəl\ adjective





You can test your theory by being in the Babylon of Revelation when fire comes for her.
If sodomy is not a sin God will spare you.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
67
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
The Bible was not written in Middle Ages Latin. It was written in Hebrew. My earlier post references original words in Hebrew. It does not specifically indicate that homosexuality was the problem. But if that's what you wish to believe, so be it.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I doubt that it will, you and Dex have read parts of it and you certainly wouldn't qualify, just based on the first of two Laws. Without reading how could you even come up with the concept of Heaven. I certainly didn't teach you that, nor anything else. You concepts are just the way they were before I posted my first post that you read.


What forums are you referencing, this one? Who cares if you believe the Bible says the same things that I say it does. Why would they be the same, you are a non-believer, as are most that post on the 'God themed' threads on this forum. That is somewhat weird in itself, is it your mission to convert others to your POV? There can be no other reason unless you just like trolling.
You like to call God fake, the Bible fake, all based on your personal opinion of those two matters. Only somebody totally incapable of independent thought would fall for that.
On top of that you don't even understand what was written.


Cliffy's attempt to not feel lonely and left out. If God isn't part of your life stay off the God themed threads. Why can you not come up with that answer and then follow through on it?

I have read the bible several times. My interpretation is nothing like yours.
When people can come on a public forum and condemn others to burn in a lake of fire for eternity, to condemn the actions of others (homosexuals. liberals and women who make the very difficult decision to abort their fetus, etc.) based on a book that has been proven by history and by science to be fraudulent, it is everybody's duty who knows the truth to expose those people and their belief as fraudulent.

If christians have a right to come on here spouting hatred and making false statements and accusations about others, It is our duty to call them on it. That is not trolling, it is a counter point to the self righteous condemnation of people who are not here to defend themselves and to show others how nasty the practice of condemning others is. I am here because you are here spouting lies.

BTW, "to know someone" may just be that you know who they are, not that they are engaged in sex that offends your sensibilities. That they are gay is your interpretation. That you are fixated on homosexuality should be of concern to you.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I was going to answer MHz too Cliffy, but you've said exactly what I would have said, so I won't bore the forum members by saying it again, except to respond specifically to the sentence where he names me, "...you and Dex have read parts of it..." I've read it all MHz, several times, in several versions, and none of them say what you think they do.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The Bible was not written in Middle Ages Latin. It was written in Hebrew. My earlier post references original words in Hebrew. It does not specifically indicate that homosexuality was the problem. But if that's what you wish to believe, so be it.
Which post number referenced the Hebrew because that also can mean anal sex (usually between men). Pay attention to the 3rd definition. Lot specifically mentions virgin daughters would be given to the men to do with as they saw fit if they would leave the strangers alone.
The Bible doesn't use the word 'sodomy', my question was, is the word 'sodomy' based on a reference to Sodom in the OT. What does your reply have to do with that?The post from a dictionary was from the middle ages.
ידע
1) to know
a) (Qal)
1) to know
a) to know, learn to know
b) to perceive
c) to perceive and see, find out and discern
d) to discriminate, distinguish
e) to know by experience
f) to recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess
g) to consider
2) to know, be acquainted with
3) to know (a person carnally)
4) to know how, be skilful in
5) to have knowledge, be wise
b) (Niphal)
1) to be made known, be or become known, be revealed
2) to make oneself known
3) to be perceived
4) to be instructed
c) (Piel) to cause to know
d) (Poal) to cause to know
e) (Pual)
1) to be known
2) known, one known, acquaintance (participle)
f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare
g) (Hophal) to be made known
h) (Hithpael) to make oneself known, reveal oneself

I have read the bible several times. My interpretation is nothing like yours.
Since you loath God that is pretty obvious that we differ in all areas. That you accept that sodomy is a normal desire between two men (and therefore morally and socially acceptable) doesn't mean you are going to find that the Holy Bible agrees with that in any form or manner.

When people can come on a public forum and condemn others to burn in a lake of fire for eternity,
For something that the God has determined is adultery? Go ahead, post a link to any post from any thread where I have ever said what you accuse me of saying. Go ahead, failure to do so means you are a liar.
Is this part of the new 'offend no-one' internet laws. What about blatant liars, like you in this very post. Offer some proof...come on show the world that you have some grain of truth in you. A liar in one instance usually a liar in another instance, let's see if this one post has more lies from a (soon to be proved by your inability to back up what you proclaim as being factual) liar.
That doesn't exclude those who are non-believers from being sent to hell for a thousand years, which is a lot less that eternity and hell is more hospitable than the fiery lake. At least the ones sent to hell are sin-free when they are retrieved by God at judgment Day.

to condemn the actions of others (homosexuals. liberals and women who make the very difficult decision to abort their fetus, etc.)
Go ahead, where have I ever said abortion was a crime against God. Before you put words in my mouth make sure you can supply some proof. It's quite true that God sees life existing at the moment of conception so those lives that are lost before the first breath of life (intentionally of accidentally) are still in line for resurrection to life. So there you go, another error in your thinking about what I believe. Since you have read the Bible (twice, lol) you must have come across the verse that states this as so. If not then it is quite likely that you lied about how much you have read in Scripture.

based on a book that has been proven by history and by science to be fraudulent,
Goody, you must have a link to this report, please post it or is this another of your lies?

it is everybody's duty who knows the truth to expose those people and their belief as fraudulent.
Rather than include everybody, lets just deal with you. Lets explore your past to see if there are personal events that could be considered to be a driving force behind your obsession with demeaning God or anybody that is a believer in God as defined by the Bible (rather than your convoluted definition of who you see as being God).
This particular area seems to be as good a place to start as any, were you sodomized by an 'figure of authority from some Church'?

If christians have a right to come on here spouting hatred and making false statements and accusations about others, It is our duty to call them on it.
Unless you are a group it is 'your' (singular)duty. Here again you can prove yourself not to be a liar by supplying references to post(s) where I (a God fearing Christian) have done what you have accused me of doing.

That is not trolling, it is a counter point to the self righteous condemnation of people who are not here to defend themselves and to show others how nasty the practice of condemning others is.
So now you are defending people who never have, nor never will, read certain posts in certain threads on a forum they have never heard of. That's quite the mission you gave yourself. How is what you are doing different from what you say you are protecting others from? It certainly seems to be a form of "to show others how nasty the practice of condemning others is".

I am here because you are here spouting lies.
You keep saying that, no proof is shown that you can (or ever will) supply that shows that God is non-existence in more than just your life. That is only proof of you being a hollow shell spiritually, or something similar.

BTW, "to know someone" may just be that you know who they are, not that they are engaged in sex that offends your sensibilities.
That could be very well for somebody called a stranger. Lot and his family lived in Sodom so how could those words be used when applied to his own daughters, expecially when virgin is specifically mentioned. Having read the Bible twice you most likely have another reference to back up you theory, please post it.
Ge:19:8:
Behold now,
I have two daughters which have not known man;
let me,
I pray you,
bring them out unto you,
and do ye to them as is good in your eyes:
only unto these men do nothing;
for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.

That they are gay is your interpretation. That you are fixated on homosexuality should be of concern to you.
They also died in the fire that followed. Their days of being gay are over. In this next reference from Scripture do you see any place for any adulterers let alone two men who want to sodomise each other?

M't:22:30:
For in the resurrection they neither marry,
nor are given in marriage,
but are as the angels of God in heaven.

I was going to answer MHz too Cliffy, but you've said exactly what I would have said, so I won't bore the forum members by saying it again, except to respond specifically to the sentence where he names me, "...you and Dex have read parts of it..." I've read it all MHz, several times, in several versions, and none of them say what you think they do.
The very same eh? Prove all his points by posting references to all his claims about me, you can't which makes you as big a liar as Cliffy.

So this isn't the resurrection of dead people based on the NT reference that the dead will arise?

1Co:15:12:
Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead,
how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
1Co:15:13:
But if there be no resurrection of the dead,
then is Christ not risen:
1Co:15:14:
And if Christ be not risen,
then is our preaching vain,
and your faith is also vain.

Eze:37:5:
Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones;
Behold,
I will cause breath to enter into you,
and ye shall live:
Eze:37:6:
And I will lay sinews upon you,
and will bring up flesh upon you,
and cover you with skin,
and put breath in you,
and ye shall live;
and ye shall know that I am the LORD.
Eze:37:7:
So I prophesied as I was commanded:
and as I prophesied,
there was a noise,
and behold a shaking,
and the bones came together,
bone to his bone.
Eze:37:8:
And when I beheld,
lo,
the sinews and the flesh came up upon them,
and the skin covered them above:
but there was no breath in them.
Eze:37:9:
Then said he unto me,
Prophesy unto the wind,
prophesy,
son of man,
and say to the wind,
Thus saith the Lord GOD;
Come from the four winds,
O breath,
and breathe upon these slain,
that they may live.
Eze:37:10:
So I prophesied as he commanded me,
and the breath came into them,
and they lived,
and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.
Eze:37:11:
Then he said unto me,
Son of man,
these bones are the whole house of Israel:
behold,
they say,
Our bones are dried,
and our hope is lost:
we are cut off for our parts.
Eze:37:12:
Therefore prophesy and say unto them,
Thus saith the Lord GOD;
Behold,
O my people,
I will open your graves,
and cause you to come up out of your graves,
and bring you into the land of Israel.
Eze:37:13:
And ye shall know that I am the LORD,
when I have opened your graves,
O my people,
and brought you up out of your graves,
Eze:37:14:
And shall put my spirit in you,
and ye shall live,
and I shall place you in your own land:
then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it,
and performed it,
saith the LORD.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Since you loath God that is pretty obvious that we differ in all areas. That you accept that sodomy is a normal desire between two men (and therefore morally and socially acceptable) doesn't mean you are going to find that the Holy Bible agrees with that in any form or manner.


For something that the God has determined is adultery? Go ahead, post a link to any post from any thread where I have ever said what you accuse me of saying. Go ahead, failure to do so means you are a liar.
Is this part of the new 'offend no-one' internet laws. What about blatant liars, like you in this very post. Offer some proof...come on show the world that you have some grain of truth in you. A liar in one instance usually a liar in another instance, let's see if this one post has more lies from a (soon to be proved by your inability to back up what you proclaim as being factual) liar.
That doesn't exclude those who are non-believers from being sent to hell for a thousand years, which is a lot less that eternity and hell is more hospitable than the fiery lake. At least the ones sent to hell are sin-free when they are retrieved by God at judgment Day.


Go ahead, where have I ever said abortion was a crime against God. Before you put words in my mouth make sure you can supply some proof. It's quite true that God sees life existing at the moment of conception so those lives that are lost before the first breath of life (intentionally of accidentally) are still in line for resurrection to life. So there you go, another error in your thinking about what I believe. Since you have read the Bible (twice, lol) you must have come across the verse that states this as so. If not then it is quite likely that you lied about how much you have read in Scripture.


Goody, you must have a link to this report, please post it or is this another of your lies?


Rather than include everybody, lets just deal with you. Lets explore your past to see if there are personal events that could be considered to be a driving force behind your obsession with demeaning God or anybody that is a believer in God as defined by the Bible (rather than your convoluted definition of who you see as being God).
This particular area seems to be as good a place to start as any, were you sodomized by an 'figure of authority from some Church'?


Unless you are a group it is 'your' (singular)duty. Here again you can prove yourself not to be a liar by supplying references to post(s) where I (a God fearing Christian) have done what you have accused me of doing.


So now you are defending people who never have, nor never will, read certain posts in certain threads on a forum they have never heard of. That's quite the mission you gave yourself. How is what you are doing different from what you say you are protecting others from? It certainly seems to be a form of "to show others how nasty the practice of condemning others is".


You keep saying that, no proof is shown that you can (or ever will) supply that shows that God is non-existence in more than just your life. That is only proof of you being a hollow shell spiritually, or something similar.


That could be very well for somebody called a stranger. Lot and his family lived in Sodom so how could those words be used when applied to his own daughters, expecially when virgin is specifically mentioned. Having read the Bible twice you most likely have another reference to back up you theory, please post it.
Ge:19:8:
Behold now,
I have two daughters which have not known man;
let me,
I pray you,
bring them out unto you,
and do ye to them as is good in your eyes:
only unto these men do nothing;
for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.


They also died in the fire that followed. Their days of being gay are over. In this next reference from Scripture do you see any place for any adulterers let alone two men who want to sodomise each other? [Quote}

I am sorry Mhz that I singled you out. My references are aimed at all the christians and Muslims on here. The lies I speak of are that the bible is a lie. It has been proven to be a construct of politically motivated control freaks like Paul and Constantine.

You may not have specifically mentioned the lake of fire, but I have seen so much reference to it lately that I just associated it with every christian spouting their propaganda on here. None the less, you have quoted the bible and the things that your god is going to do with those who refuse to bow down has kiss his divine hieny.

I do believe in a supreme being but the one spoken of in the bible is a psychotic tyrant and bares no resemblance to a loving and benevolent creator. The references in the bible were created by man to control other men and have no basis in fact and therefore are lies by definition. That being so, why would I read such trash and quote it. It is meaningless gibberish.
 
Last edited:

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Hey Cliff- You ever notice that religious people almost invariably have a great ability to argue at length? I also wonder why religious people think they have been endowed with all this knowledge and wisdom the rest of us don't have. But then maybe if we'd gone to Sunday School more we'd have it too. :lol:

A lot of that is cut and paste, JLM. Religious people usually parrot the official party line, they parrot their religious book. Do you remember eanassir, how he used to post long posts, with passages from Koran (he mercifully hasn’t put in an appearance for a long time now).

So don’t confuse the ability to cut and paste, the ability to parrot the official party line with ability to argue at length.

Religious people think that they are endowed with the knowledge that mortals like you or I don’t have, because they think that they have a direct hotline to God and that God speaks with them. Isn’t that what George Bush used to say? That is also what the televangelists say.

But what I have generally found (there are exceptions obviously) is that religious people cannot think independently, they can only parrot their Holy Book.

I don’t know about you, but when I see an overlong post it puts me off; I tend not to read it. If I have a lot to say and the post is becoming too long, I break it up into two or more smaller posts. Too long a post tends to put the reader off (at least it puts me off).
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
A lot of that is cut and paste, JLM. Religious people usually parrot the official party line, they parrot their religious book. Do you remember eanassir, how he used to post long posts, with passages from Koran (he mercifully hasn’t put in an appearance for a long time now).

So don’t confuse the ability to cut and paste, the ability to parrot the official party line with ability to argue at length.

Religious people think that they are endowed with the knowledge that mortals like you or I don’t have, because they think that they have a direct hotline to God and that God speaks with them. Isn’t that what George Bush used to say? That is also what the televangelists say.

But what I have generally found (there are exceptions obviously) is that religious people cannot think independently, they can only parrot their Holy Book.

I don’t know about you, but when I see an overlong post it puts me off; I tend not to read it. If I have a lot to say and the post is becoming too long, I break it up into two or more smaller posts. Too long a post tends to put the reader off (at least it puts me off).

A generation or two ago there were some truly religious people who read their Bible, never spoke badly about anyone, helped other people and didn't preech or stick their noses in other people's business. I doubt if they believed chapter and verse of the entire Bible unless they accepted it as allegory, but they had a firm faith in God and really believed they were here to serve. But you wouldn't see them hanging on the coattails of Jimmy Swaggert or Oral Roberts. I have respect for those people, but certainly not the ones shouting fire and brimstone.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
A generation or two ago there were some truly religious people who read their Bible, never spoke badly about anyone, helped other people and didn't preech or stick their noses in other people's business. I doubt if they believed chapter and verse of the entire Bible unless they accepted it as allegory, but they had a firm faith in God and really believed they were here to serve. But you wouldn't see them hanging on the coattails of Jimmy Swaggert or Oral Roberts. I have respect for those people, but certainly not the ones shouting fire and brimstone.

It has been my experience that there are those, no matter what their beliefs, who understand that it is about how they live their life not how others live theirs. I have met people from many different belief systems who become what they believe. Most however, need to have constant validation by convincing others they are right and converting them to their belief system in the false belief that there is strength in numbers. We are born into this life alone, we live alone, we die alone. If we live by the simple rule to treat others as we would wish them to treat us, we do no harm, then what we make of our journey has no consequence to anybody else. Life is between you and your creator, whatever you perceive that to be (or not to be).
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I am sorry Mhz that I singled you out. My references are aimed at all the christians and Muslims on here. The lies I speak of are that the bible is a lie. It has been proven to be a construct of politically motivated control freaks like Paul and Constantine.
Well gee Cliffy, I get into arguments/discussions on Christian based boards, that doesn't mean I dislike them. It is what they are saying about what the Bible says is simple wrong. By trying to take them by the hand and lead them to some specific verses show them how they are in error. You don't get all the information in two reads. First of all it is not to be read as is a normal novel. Since most questions have more than one single component several different verses are how the reply comes. Like any instruction manual it has the equivelent of an index at the end. Revelation is where you start and then you ared all the relevent passages from the previous other Books. Go after the false christans, I do, they don't like me any more than you do. I won't miss them any more than I will you. In your zeal you want to kill the whole when it is a few who need correct. If I read it more than twice does that make more authoritive on what it means than you?

You may not have specifically mentioned the lake of fire, but I have seen so much reference to it lately that I just associated it with every christian spouting their propaganda on here.
It would seem a rather foolish thing to do actually. If I disliked one ant I should kill them all in a single one harmes me or a beloved one.

I even had a Christian complain the there were too many verses in my posts. He agreed it was a pretty stupid thing to say. The willingness to admit to not being perfect mean something positive as We chatted for awhile after that.

None the less, you have quoted the bible and the things that your god is going to do with those who refuse to bow down has kiss his divine hieny.
Yeah, He will basically set you on your butt. When Satan is out of Heaven for the last time he lands on his butt, what an entrance to Earth LOL. Bad Satan, bad.

I do believe in a supreme being but the one spoken of in the bible is a psychotic tyrant and bares no resemblance to a loving and benevolent creator. The references in the bible were created by man to control other men and have no basis in fact and therefore are lies by definition. That being so, why would I read such trash and quote it. It is meaningless gibberish.
If He has those two charastics should you know know the difference between the two. Most parents can communicate withjust glance at a son or daughter. They know if it is a look of approval (continue doing what you were doing) odf disapproval.

Please stop now that you know, and no I do not want to discuss anything Scripture related because you are so far behind you think you are ahead.
Like Dex who has more than one Bible and has read at least as much as you but it just slipped away like a vapor. If one Bible doesn't get your whole attention running around buying more things to read about the same subject is a waste of money mostly. Those are not help books other than 'help the author get rich'. The story of Jesus and the money changers is the very same in all translations. The best one is a free one, from ther you should not invest more than one sourse.

Hey Cliff- You ever notice that religious people almost invariably have a great ability to argue at length? I also wonder why religious people think they have been endowed with all this knowledge and wisdom the rest of us don't have. But then maybe if we'd gone to Sunday School more we'd have it too. :lol:
You came on post #2...and here you are..still...
Well for some reading many different parts at various times can be a faster way to learn than reading it from one end to the other. Sooner or later you have to backtrack.
Actually I took the $1 for the plate and went to where most of my friends were.
That was probably your last contact with Scripture, wow.



A lot of that is cut and paste, JLM. Religious people usually parrot the official party line, they parrot their religious book. Do you remember eanassir, how he used to post long posts, with passages from Koran (he mercifully hasn’t put in an appearance for a long time now).
Some verse and two seperate dictionaries, wow. Compared to this totally fluff piece with no actual contend other than his lonely voice. In another place I talked to a Muslim for about 20 pages on the differences in the story of Noah's ark. We ended up agreeing that taking babies would allow more species to be stored and less supplies needed.
So don’t confuse the ability to cut and paste, the ability to parrot the official party line with ability to argue at length. That the second reference to 40 days in the OT was the same first 40 days of the flood rather than the Ark bouncing off some ground (lunar tide) and then re-floating for another 40 days. A few other things and then some that were rejected as being quite different. All and all well worth it. More than two posts with SJP and it is an eternity in hell longer.

Religious people think that they are endowed with the knowledge that mortals like you or I don’t have, because they think that they have a direct hotline to God and that God speaks with them. Isn’t that what George Bush used to say? That is also what the televangelists say.
He does, it called His Holy Word, it can be picked up any time of any day and opened to any page (more or less) and you can find something that you can understand within 3 tries. Using the index method is a lot more sure.
That is info SJP will never see cause I'm on his ignore (list no doubt) LOL and it is too long post if somebody helps him read it.

But what I have generally found (there are exceptions obviously) is that religious people cannot think independently, they can only parrot their Holy Book.
I could take you places where in several years I got not one thing 'right' about the Bible. The owner even gave me by 'special place' where tangents were more than a rare thing.
And I spotted SJP as being a twit after only a few posts.

I don’t know about you, but when I see an overlong post it puts me off; I tend not to read it. If I have a lot to say and the post is becoming too long, I break it up into two or more smaller posts. Too long a post tends to put the reader off (at least it puts me off).
Good, this post is too several people, maybe your friend will not help you read this part.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I get into arguments/discussions on Christian based boards, that doesn't mean I dislike them. It is what they are saying about what the Bible says is simple wrong. By trying to take them by the hand and lead them to some specific verses show them how they are in error.

Mhz,

You don't get it at all do you. It is the bible that is in error. You can interpret it any way you like it is still a work of fiction. There are people out there that think that Star Trek is the truth. They dress up as characters in the movie and go to conventions all over the country and model their lives on their favourite character. They even learn how to speak Klingon and Ferengie. They totally immerse themselves in the story. They can talk about nothing else. It totally dominates their lives.

What you are doing is no different. Life is out there. You need to get out more often. See and talk to people with different ideas, broaden your horizons. Life is for living, not waiting for rewards in a fictitious afterlife.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Regarding your belief that I 'dogged' you on Can.com.. Yeah, when you tried to peddle that bullsh*t about the Pope putting out a hit (in writing mind you) on 100 million people, well, all I did was take you to task on that.. Like Anna, you didn't like it when you were questioned and made to look the fool in the end.

captain,

In your dreams. It must be nice to be so certain of your own greatness.