Founder of Islam, Mohammad, was a Pedophile
- Thread starter In Between Man
- Start date
Perhaps you have not recognized my estimation of the Prophet, eanassir.
I consider him a man of genius, in fact cunning. No one who spawned a religion with a billion adherents could be anything else. But i am also aware that his entire message, it primary purpose, in fact, was that of a direct challenge to and rejection of the Divinity of Christ, of His co-substantiality within the Blessed Trinity, and therefor of Christianity. There is UTTERLY no way to reconcile Islam and Christianity.
They are antithetical in structure and meaning, in morals and understanding of God. And therefor any good Christian would realize such a flagrant and total rejection of the True God, could only be device of the Devil. The question you have to ponder is whether his genius was of a Diabolical character.
Last edited:
Have Muslims occupied your countries, or is it you that have occupied their countries?
Have Muslims occupied your countries, or is it you that have occupied the Muslim countries?
I posted the results of a poll on 9/11 being an inside job, if the majority said it was an inside job yet nothing is done r 'fix-it' then the poll is wrong or the smaller number has all the power.
If the Muslim countries (and a great deal more besides them) are be hounded and haunted by the 'Christian Nations' then you might have to consider what part of the 7 Churches they belong too. Exposing them should be best accomplished if it comes from within the same nations. That would hold true for Jews and Muslims as well, so far in history that has worked exactly zero times, that is why mankind is so stunted in its growth.
If the Muslim countries (and a great deal more besides them) are be hounded and haunted by the 'Christian Nations' then you might have to consider what part of the 7 Churches they belong too. Exposing them should be best accomplished if it comes from within the same nations. That would hold true for Jews and Muslims as well, so far in history that has worked exactly zero times, that is why mankind is so stunted in its growth.
Yes, there are Muslims are in my country and many more want to immigrate to western countries,
They cause problems in all the western countries they immigrate too.
Also, they do not carry their weigh in contributing to Canada when they come here, they only look after themselves.
And, yes, muslim countries are asking western countries to help, they complain about the west but when they get into trouble, they ask and look to the west for help..
They should ask Mo for help!!!
You do know the difference between occupy and immigrate, right? Or are you an even bigger moron then I figured?
It depends on which country you belong to.
A rancorous biased reply.
So Muslims do not contribute to Canada, and your people contributed to Canada; how did they contribute?
Man, Durry is a colossal retard of epic proportions.... I try to be less offensive but this is the only way to describe the stupidity of this neanderthal.
I guarantee there are Muslims in this country, who love Canada, and who work harder for this country than him, I KNOW THIS!
Also, you could argue these Muslim immigrants are bigger patriots than us, they weren't just here from luck of birth, THEY MOVED HERE BY CHOICE, they WANTED to be in this great country.
I guarantee there are Muslims in this country, who love Canada, and who work harder for this country than him, I KNOW THIS!
Also, you could argue these Muslim immigrants are bigger patriots than us, they weren't just here from luck of birth, THEY MOVED HERE BY CHOICE, they WANTED to be in this great country.
Isn't that the logic that YukonJack uses to show that he's more of a Canadian than everyone else?
This is not particularly surprising. Various extreme forms of sexual expression have always existed, though there are many that insist it's only a recent phenomenon resulting from our social moral decay; I suggest nonsense to this explanation. What I find really interesting is the degree to which people vilify modern day pedophiles, hedophiles, etc, yet idolize past ones. Michelangelo, Leonardo, Shakespeare, all of which were by our modern standards, sexual delinquents.
I know the counter to this is that social mores were different back then and that as a result, they did not have the refined sense of morality that we have today. This however is not true at all as it suggests that one's sexual tendencies are taught, not innate.
I'm not really making much of a judgement on Shakespeare and the like, but I figured I would point out people's cognitive dissonance on this matter.
I know the counter to this is that social mores were different back then and that as a result, they did not have the refined sense of morality that we have today. This however is not true at all as it suggests that one's sexual tendencies are taught, not innate.
I'm not really making much of a judgement on Shakespeare and the like, but I figured I would point out people's cognitive dissonance on this matter.