For first time Canadians join program that educates teachers on climate change

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The 97% Consensus was a complete fabrication and proven to be such.


Hell, there were even lawsuits filed against the IPCC by researchers and scientists whose names were listed, but (somehow) never knew that they agreed.

... I really can't recall the last time that 'the consensus' was taken to Court for misrepresentation of the actual consensus
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I ask for proof and you guys provide arm chair denialists.

Like I said, the consensus is solid and nothing has changed that.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,120
14,233
113
Low Earth Orbit
I ask for proof and you guys provide arm chair denialists.

Like I said, the consensus is solid and nothing has changed that consensus.

You got your proof. 97% of 23% of AGW convinced authors. Where do you think that came from? CO2 laden thin air?

Do you enjoy being lied to?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I ask for proof and you guys provide arm chair denialists.

Like I said, the consensus is solid and nothing has changed that.

Facts hurt don't they.

No 97% Consensus. More alarmist propaganda debunked over and over.

You got your proof. 97% of 23% of AGW convinced authors. Where do you think that came from? CO2 laden thin air?

Do you enjoy being lied to?

He needs to believe! It is his life now. His religion.

Why do you think he posts thread after thread? He knows they are doomed.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,120
14,233
113
Low Earth Orbit
BTW it's was proven using MIS-11 that the CO2/temperature corellation falls apart and they go their own way.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Facts hurt don't they.

No 97% Consensus. More alarmist propaganda debunked over and over.

I'm still waiting on these debunking facts you speak so highly of.

So far we just have two fancy links with no content.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I'm still waiting on these debunking facts you speak so highly of.

So far we just have two fancy links with no content.

The facts are there... there was never a 97% consensus. Extrapolations and biased assumptions from people who have an agenda was all it was.

And you drank deeply of the kool-aid.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,120
14,233
113
Low Earth Orbit
I'm still waiting on these debunking facts you speak so highly of.

So far we just have two fancy links with no content.

You'll have to g back to what you ignored months ago. You ignored it then, why would you accept it now ? Ignoring it again will do what for you?

What part of 97% of 23% of self backpatting authors who agree with AGW gives you grief?

66% of 12000 authors take no stance on AGW.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,120
14,233
113
Low Earth Orbit
Guess I expected too much from you guys lol

It's you who failed. A link to the entire break down of support/non-support/misleading consensus of AGW was handed to you on a silver platter three time already and explained repeatedly.

What more do you want? Your hand held?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Guess I expected too much from you guys lol

You got face planted... FIN