Fed up with Islam Yet???

[spilledthebeer]

Poor T-bones-has nothing to say and says it poorly too....you already used that special needs `joke`. Even your humour is a lame rerun......

But here is something for you to consider:


Here is a rather harsh but true call to arms for fair minded western citizens-I pulled it off the internet and don’t know who wrote it but it does make an honest point and it has some comments of my own in brackets):

Facing Reality- here & abroad.

Awww... those poor "illegal immigrants"! That's exactly what the Swedes said: C'mon right in, all you filthy, unwashed, and uneducated immigrants... Sweden welcomes you!

Now look what's happened - before these crazies even took a bath, they've turned that once beautiful, prosperous, and peaceful country into a dangerous, chaotic, third-world hell hole and are now demanding that the Swedes bow to their own "Sharia Law" rather than obeying the legitimately enacted laws of their generous & overly gracious hosts!

Remember that the next time someone foolishly tells you how we should be "kind" and allow thousands of these random and unidentified illegal immigrants, many who could easily be dangerous criminals fleeing from justice in the US, to sneak unchallenged into Canada under the cover of darkness in order to flout our immigration laws and leech off our already severely strained health, educational, and social welfare systems.

(But LIE-berals tell us that being generous to these unknown and unidentified refugees is somehow good for Canada? Maybe LIE-berals really mean its GOOD FOR THEM as they get to BUY votes and support. We do know for instance-that Ontari-owe LIE-berals are HATED everywhere outside the Toronto/GTA area. In the last provincial election, LIE-berals would have been destroyed if they only had rural Ontari-owe to call on-it was Toronto that empowered LIE-berals-and it is Toronto that gets TEN TIMES MORE provincial money per citizen than any other Ontari-owe municipality! I call it vote BUYING for a legitimate reason!

Many in power still steadfastly refuse to acknowledge all the problems they're causing for Sweden. That alone says something ominous about the total irresponsibility of our own politicians. It's about time that they pulled their heads out of the sand and started addressing this ever-worsening problem! Despite all the crying of the impotent SJW's, time may yet prove Donald Trump to be one of the greatest and strongest Presidents in the entire history of the USA! After all, you don't even deserve to have a country if you won't stand up to defend your own ideals and borders.

(I point out that in early 2017 there were accusations of wide spread sex assaults and robberies in Sweden and in Germany after the new years celebrations but real numbers are hard to come by as Swedes are like Cdns-they think it is racist to keep crime numbers based on race. It is alleged that LIE-beral minded persons in Swedish govt are keeping a lid on true numbers and real racial problems by discouraging cops from keeping score of who does what and gets charged for it.)

Although mug shots of persons arrested and charged would make a distinction between blond, blue eyed Swedes and the Muslim refugees that are alleged to be behind the crime spree. Swedish leaders have vowed to sort out the truth but there has been only silence as the year progresses and one must wonder if the LIE-beral `fix` is in?)

Good to see you, spill. We appreciate input from the special-needs community.

 

[Johnnny]

Actualy Tbones does a good job at keeping people on their toes which means if you want to be convincing you'll have to up your game.

 

[JLM]

Actualy Tbones does a good job at keeping people on their toes which means if you want to be convincing you'll have to up your game.

T- bones is no problem for me, I just don't take any sh*t from the A$$hole, and besides I'm smarter than he is.

 

[darkbeaver]

I enjoy TBs post as well, it is smart, it has bean educated, and it has a sence of humour, it might be human.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Actualy Tbones does a good job at keeping people on their toes which means if you want to be convincing you'll have to up your game.

I'm not sure spill's game has any up.

 

[Johnnny]

Fed up with Islam???

Fed up with the bullshit that still exists...

Google Jakarta Elections....

If you had a brain you would see this as an example why the church and state should be seperate....

 

[darkbeaver]

Church and state cannot be separated. The one is the other.

 

[Johnnny]

Church and state cannot be separated. The one is the other.

Then we are doomed to stagnant and become the Imperium of the 41st century...

 

[spaminator]

French police thwart imminent 'terror attack' days before election | TERRORISM |

Cops: Man kills 3 on street, says he 'hates white people' | World | News | Toron

 

[Colpy]

April 21 marks the opening, at the Berkeley campus of the University of California, of the sixth annual academic conference on Islamophobia. If past conclaves are a guide, the conference will be marked by a morass of impenetrable academic jargon and an unremitting flow of anti-Western rhetoric.
Here, if one cares to observe, one may see the academic pistons of the blasphemy-law promotional industry pumping vigorously away at its task, to ensure that expression of hostility to the religion of Islam achieves cultural parity on campuses as a shaming thought crime, morally equivalent to expressed hostility to women, blacks, gays and aboriginals.
What ends in law often begins in academia. And the Berkeley conferences are ground zero in North America for hardline theories around Islamophobia. This cadre does not shy away from definitions of Islamophobia, unlike those who promoted and voted for Motion 103, championed by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid and recently passed by Canada’s Parliament. The motion calls for a committee to “study” how to develop a “a whole-of-government approach” to reducing and eliminating Islamophobia, specifically. That word, Islamophobia, left truculently undefined by all politicians supporting its inclusion, glows with radioactive intensity.
Does M-103’s “Islamophobia” mean expressed hatred of people — the West’s normal definition of hatred — or hatred of a belief system, normally a protected category of expression here, as religious Christians know to their chagrin? Canadians have no idea if their right to express distaste for Islam would still be protected in a bill premised on the recommendations of this “study.”
I therefore contacted Jasmin Zine, who teaches race, ethnic, gender and postcolonial studies at Wilfrid Laurier University. She is a regular — and ideologically representative — participant in the Berkeley Islamophobia conferences, including this one.
I asked her to define Islamophobia for me, which she promptly did: “Islamophobia is a fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims that translates into individual, ideological and systemic forms of oppression.” This is quite an insidious, though admittedly clever, definition. Note that it puts “fear and hatred” of Islam, not Muslims, at the centre of the phobia. And the word “translates” is a masterstroke.
Under this definition, if I write publicly that Islam is inherently Christophobic and anti-Semitic according to its own texts, and a Muslim declares himself “oppressed” by my statement, who would be the interpeter for the alleged “translation”? The courts? Iqra Khalid? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?
As one can see from her defined area of study, Zine is an intersectionalist, who sees the world in Marxist tropes of power and powerlessness, with white imperialists and their issue holding the power, and all disadvantaged minorities, into which category Muslims are now tucked, as the systematically disempowered.
It takes a certain chutzpah to hold that Islam, given its history of conquest of indigenous peoples, sexism, homophobia and violence against Christians and Jews, is equal in victim status — given their respective histories — to blacks, native Americans, gays and Jews. Yet that is the basic narrative thrust not only of Zine’s work, but of all the “scholars” promoting the Islamophobia blasphemy-law agenda.
Their guru is Hatem Bazian, faculty sponsor, IRDP creator and effective leader of the Berkeley conference. Founder of Students for Justice in Palestine, Bazian is also a former fundraising speaker for the anti-Israel organization KindHearts, shut down by the U.S. government in 2006 for its alleged ties to Hamas.
(Bazian is often cited for what appeared to be a call to violence at a 2004 San Francisco rally, when he shouted: “Well, we’ve been watching an intifada in Palestine, we’ve been watching an uprising in Iraq … How come we don’t have an intifada in this country? … they’re gonna say (I’m) being too radical. Well, you haven’t seen radicalism yet!”)
At a former conference, Jasmin Zine spoke on “Constructing the ‘Enemies Within’: Muslim Youth, Islamophobia, and the Racial Politics of Canada’s ‘Home Grown’ War on Terror.” Zine concluded that it was not jihadist ideology at the root of homegrown terrorists — rather, it was Islamophobia, the “politics of empire” and the “racialized security industrial complex.”
Zine does not outright condone terrorism, but insists it is necessary to “situate these acts within a broader historical context … such as the racial violence of colonialism, genocide, slavery, occupation and apartheid.” She has likened America’s Guantanamo Bay detention centre to a “colonial plantation” and a Nazi concentration camp. And Zine sees Omar Khadr’s radicalization as the result of Canada’s failure to properly integrate his family. Uh-huh.
Ominously, Zine calls Canadian Muslim reformists like Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah — Muslims who want to see an Islam emerge that is compatible with democratic principles — “native informers,” because they are eager to co-operate with security services in identifying radicalizing elements within the Muslim community.
Will Zine be invited to participate in the M-103 study? I am guessing she will be. Will Canadian patriots and democratic Muslims Tarek Fatah and Raheel Raza be invited as well? I would hope so. If all three are, to whose testimony will greater weight be assigned, to whom more deference shown?


Barbara Kay: How academics portray Islam as a

 

[Buffy]

April 21 marks the opening, at the Berkeley campus of the University of California, of the sixth annual academic conference on Islamophobia. If past conclaves are a guide, the conference will be marked by a morass of impenetrable academic jargon and an unremitting flow of anti-Western rhetoric.
Here, if one cares to observe, one may see the academic pistons of the blasphemy-law promotional industry pumping vigorously away at its task, to ensure that expression of hostility to the religion of Islam achieves cultural parity on campuses as a shaming thought crime, morally equivalent to expressed hostility to women, blacks, gays and aboriginals.
What ends in law often begins in academia. And the Berkeley conferences are ground zero in North America for hardline theories around Islamophobia. This cadre does not shy away from definitions of Islamophobia, unlike those who promoted and voted for Motion 103, championed by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid and recently passed by Canada’s Parliament. The motion calls for a committee to “study” how to develop a “a whole-of-government approach” to reducing and eliminating Islamophobia, specifically. That word, Islamophobia, left truculently undefined by all politicians supporting its inclusion, glows with radioactive intensity.
Does M-103’s “Islamophobia” mean expressed hatred of people — the West’s normal definition of hatred — or hatred of a belief system, normally a protected category of expression here, as religious Christians know to their chagrin? Canadians have no idea if their right to express distaste for Islam would still be protected in a bill premised on the recommendations of this “study.”
I therefore contacted Jasmin Zine, who teaches race, ethnic, gender and postcolonial studies at Wilfrid Laurier University. She is a regular — and ideologically representative — participant in the Berkeley Islamophobia conferences, including this one.
I asked her to define Islamophobia for me, which she promptly did: “Islamophobia is a fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims that translates into individual, ideological and systemic forms of oppression.” This is quite an insidious, though admittedly clever, definition. Note that it puts “fear and hatred” of Islam, not Muslims, at the centre of the phobia. And the word “translates” is a masterstroke.
Under this definition, if I write publicly that Islam is inherently Christophobic and anti-Semitic according to its own texts, and a Muslim declares himself “oppressed” by my statement, who would be the interpeter for the alleged “translation”? The courts? Iqra Khalid? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?
As one can see from her defined area of study, Zine is an intersectionalist, who sees the world in Marxist tropes of power and powerlessness, with white imperialists and their issue holding the power, and all disadvantaged minorities, into which category Muslims are now tucked, as the systematically disempowered.
It takes a certain chutzpah to hold that Islam, given its history of conquest of indigenous peoples, sexism, homophobia and violence against Christians and Jews, is equal in victim status — given their respective histories — to blacks, native Americans, gays and Jews. Yet that is the basic narrative thrust not only of Zine’s work, but of all the “scholars” promoting the Islamophobia blasphemy-law agenda.
Their guru is Hatem Bazian, faculty sponsor, IRDP creator and effective leader of the Berkeley conference. Founder of Students for Justice in Palestine, Bazian is also a former fundraising speaker for the anti-Israel organization KindHearts, shut down by the U.S. government in 2006 for its alleged ties to Hamas.
(Bazian is often cited for what appeared to be a call to violence at a 2004 San Francisco rally, when he shouted: “Well, we’ve been watching an intifada in Palestine, we’ve been watching an uprising in Iraq … How come we don’t have an intifada in this country? … they’re gonna say (I’m) being too radical. Well, you haven’t seen radicalism yet!”)
At a former conference, Jasmin Zine spoke on “Constructing the ‘Enemies Within’: Muslim Youth, Islamophobia, and the Racial Politics of Canada’s ‘Home Grown’ War on Terror.” Zine concluded that it was not jihadist ideology at the root of homegrown terrorists — rather, it was Islamophobia, the “politics of empire” and the “racialized security industrial complex.”
Zine does not outright condone terrorism, but insists it is necessary to “situate these acts within a broader historical context … such as the racial violence of colonialism, genocide, slavery, occupation and apartheid.” She has likened America’s Guantanamo Bay detention centre to a “colonial plantation” and a Nazi concentration camp. And Zine sees Omar Khadr’s radicalization as the result of Canada’s failure to properly integrate his family. Uh-huh.
Ominously, Zine calls Canadian Muslim reformists like Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah — Muslims who want to see an Islam emerge that is compatible with democratic principles — “native informers,” because they are eager to co-operate with security services in identifying radicalizing elements within the Muslim community.
Will Zine be invited to participate in the M-103 study? I am guessing she will be. Will Canadian patriots and democratic Muslims Tarek Fatah and Raheel Raza be invited as well? I would hope so. If all three are, to whose testimony will greater weight be assigned, to whom more deference shown?


Barbara Kay: How academics portray Islam as a

A phobia is an irrational fear. Because no fear of Islam is irrational there is no such thing as Islamophobia.

 

[spaminator]

Racist Fresno suspect seethed with rage | World | News | Toronto Sun

Fresno gunman targeting whites chose 3 men at random: Cops | World | News | Toro

 

[spilledthebeer]

LIE-berals assure us that all views on Islamophobia will be allowed to speak but what they wont admit is that those with a healthy fear of Islam and who are worried about more Muslim terror WILL NOT BE HEARD! The Trudeau LIE-berals are engaged in a political coup with Cdn democracy and free speech on the line.

Any LIE-beral reference to opposing "islamophobia is code wording for smearing opponents of LIE-beral policy as bigots!

April 21 marks the opening, at the Berkeley campus of the University of California, of the sixth annual academic conference on Islamophobia. If past conclaves are a guide, the conference will be marked by a morass of impenetrable academic jargon and an unremitting flow of anti-Western rhetoric.
Here, if one cares to observe, one may see the academic pistons of the blasphemy-law promotional industry pumping vigorously away at its task, to ensure that expression of hostility to the religion of Islam achieves cultural parity on campuses as a shaming thought crime, morally equivalent to expressed hostility to women, blacks, gays and aboriginals.
What ends in law often begins in academia. And the Berkeley conferences are ground zero in North America for hardline theories around Islamophobia. This cadre does not shy away from definitions of Islamophobia, unlike those who promoted and voted for Motion 103, championed by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid and recently passed by Canada’s Parliament. The motion calls for a committee to “study” how to develop a “a whole-of-government approach” to reducing and eliminating Islamophobia, specifically. That word, Islamophobia, left truculently undefined by all politicians supporting its inclusion, glows with radioactive intensity.
Does M-103’s “Islamophobia” mean expressed hatred of people — the West’s normal definition of hatred — or hatred of a belief system, normally a protected category of expression here, as religious Christians know to their chagrin? Canadians have no idea if their right to express distaste for Islam would still be protected in a bill premised on the recommendations of this “study.”
I therefore contacted Jasmin Zine, who teaches race, ethnic, gender and postcolonial studies at Wilfrid Laurier University. She is a regular — and ideologically representative — participant in the Berkeley Islamophobia conferences, including this one.
I asked her to define Islamophobia for me, which she promptly did: “Islamophobia is a fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims that translates into individual, ideological and systemic forms of oppression.” This is quite an insidious, though admittedly clever, definition. Note that it puts “fear and hatred” of Islam, not Muslims, at the centre of the phobia. And the word “translates” is a masterstroke.
Under this definition, if I write publicly that Islam is inherently Christophobic and anti-Semitic according to its own texts, and a Muslim declares himself “oppressed” by my statement, who would be the interpeter for the alleged “translation”? The courts? Iqra Khalid? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?
As one can see from her defined area of study, Zine is an intersectionalist, who sees the world in Marxist tropes of power and powerlessness, with white imperialists and their issue holding the power, and all disadvantaged minorities, into which category Muslims are now tucked, as the systematically disempowered.
It takes a certain chutzpah to hold that Islam, given its history of conquest of indigenous peoples, sexism, homophobia and violence against Christians and Jews, is equal in victim status — given their respective histories — to blacks, native Americans, gays and Jews. Yet that is the basic narrative thrust not only of Zine’s work, but of all the “scholars” promoting the Islamophobia blasphemy-law agenda.
Their guru is Hatem Bazian, faculty sponsor, IRDP creator and effective leader of the Berkeley conference. Founder of Students for Justice in Palestine, Bazian is also a former fundraising speaker for the anti-Israel organization KindHearts, shut down by the U.S. government in 2006 for its alleged ties to Hamas.
(Bazian is often cited for what appeared to be a call to violence at a 2004 San Francisco rally, when he shouted: “Well, we’ve been watching an intifada in Palestine, we’ve been watching an uprising in Iraq … How come we don’t have an intifada in this country? … they’re gonna say (I’m) being too radical. Well, you haven’t seen radicalism yet!”)
At a former conference, Jasmin Zine spoke on “Constructing the ‘Enemies Within’: Muslim Youth, Islamophobia, and the Racial Politics of Canada’s ‘Home Grown’ War on Terror.” Zine concluded that it was not jihadist ideology at the root of homegrown terrorists — rather, it was Islamophobia, the “politics of empire” and the “racialized security industrial complex.”
Zine does not outright condone terrorism, but insists it is necessary to “situate these acts within a broader historical context … such as the racial violence of colonialism, genocide, slavery, occupation and apartheid.” She has likened America’s Guantanamo Bay detention centre to a “colonial plantation” and a Nazi concentration camp. And Zine sees Omar Khadr’s radicalization as the result of Canada’s failure to properly integrate his family. Uh-huh.
Ominously, Zine calls Canadian Muslim reformists like Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah — Muslims who want to see an Islam emerge that is compatible with democratic principles — “native informers,” because they are eager to co-operate with security services in identifying radicalizing elements within the Muslim community.
Will Zine be invited to participate in the M-103 study? I am guessing she will be. Will Canadian patriots and democratic Muslims Tarek Fatah and Raheel Raza be invited as well? I would hope so. If all three are, to whose testimony will greater weight be assigned, to whom more deference shown?


Barbara Kay: How academics portray Islam as a

 

[spaminator]

Parents win battle over toddler’s last name of ‘Allah’

 

[spaminator]

'Let black people go,' Fresno murder suspect, accused of shooting three white me

Detroit doc allegedly mutilated girls' genitals | World | News | Toronto Sun

Detroit doctor denies performing female circumcisions; Judge keeps her locked up

Female genital mutilation is not a Canadian value | AGAR | Columnists | Opinion

More charges filed in Detroit in genital mutilation probe | World | News | Toron

 

[spaminator]

Mama kills best | CRIME HUNTER | World | News | Toronto Sun

 

[spaminator]

Changes at passport offices due to terrorism concerns | Canada | News | Toronto

 

[spaminator]

3 men convicted in Swedish rape livestreamed on Facebook | World | News | Toront

 

[spaminator]

Jail then deport convicted sex predator: Crown | Toronto & GTA | News | Toronto

Human Rights Tribunal rules Brampton landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000 | M

Doctors in Detroit-area genital mutilation case indicted | World | News | Toront

 

[Johnnny]

Human Rights Tribunal rules Brampton landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000 | M

This one needs an explanation, i dont understand this one....

“When considered together, I find that the comment ‘welcome to Ontario, Canada,’ the making of loud pounding noises outside the applicants’ door shortly after making that comment, and (Alabi)’s refusal to remove his shoes when entering (their) prayer space amounted to harassment under the Code.”

In addition to paying them $6,000 each for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect, Alabi must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.”