Fed up with Islam Yet???

[spaminator]

Comfort Inn cancels mosque's Eid prayer after gender exclusion complaints
Philip Marcelo, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Friday, September 01, 2017 11:04 AM EDT | Updated: Friday, September 01, 2017 11:13 AM EDT
BOSTON — A Boston-area mosque says its celebration of one of Islam’s holiest days has been cancelled after the host venue received complaints that women and children were being excluded.
The Masjid Al Rahma announced on its Facebook page on Thursday that it wasn’t hosting Eid al-Adha prayer Friday morning because the host hotel in Revere, Massachusetts, cancelled the event.
A hotel manager confirmed the cancellation, but declined to elaborate. Mosque leaders said the hotel received calls critical of the men only service.
Critics on social media said the event ran counter to the spirit of the holy day, which marks the end of hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia.
A director at the non-profit Islamic Circle of North America, Malika MacDonald, said many mosques typically hold outdoor services to accommodate large crowds.
http://facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=524730644533383&id=100009893559097
Comfort Inn cancels mosque's Eid prayer after gender exclusion complaints | Worl

 

[spaminator]

Female genital mutilation defended in article on ‘Muslims in Calgary’ website
By Candice Malcolm
First posted: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 01:44 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 01:49 PM EDT
‘Muslims in Calgary’ has an article on its website defending the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM).
In the undated article entitled Female Circumcision in Islam, author Asiff Hussein claims both that FGM is “an Islamic practice” and that it “brings untold benefits to women.”
Hussein discusses the 2009 ruling by Malaysia’s National Council for Islamic Religious Affairs that FGM was mandatory for Muslim women, noting that he “could not find anything objectionable in it.”
He states that more “barbaric forms of FGM practised in sub-Saharan Africa” are counter to Shariah Law, but advocates for what he calls a “relatively minor” procedure that cuts the skin covering the clitoris.
The article cites several hadiths — writings that supplement the Qur’an in providing religious guidance for Muslims — that advocate for FGM to demonstrate the historic and Islamic basis for the practice.
Hussein makes a case for the supposed health benefits, while also admitting the practice reduces what he calls “the excessive sexual arousal in women.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) condemns all forms of FGM, which is practiced today in more than 30 countries and has been carried out on 200 million girls and women worldwide.
According to WHO guidelines, “there are no known health benefits” to FGM. The WHO unequivocally states that “female genital mutilation is a violation of human rights (and it) must never be performed.”
Hussein’s article is also full of racist and anti-Semitic statements.
He blames “the Jews” for leading the criticism against FGM, and claims the “Jewish controlled media” is responsible for the negative attitude towards this practice.
The website features an opinion disclaimer, stating the views in the article are that of the individual author, “solely meant for education, discussion and debate, not for any illegal purpose.” The disclaimer also states that the author is not affiliated with the ‘Muslims in Calgary’ website.
Asiff Hussein is a Sri Lankan writer, and it is unclear why his controversial article is posted on the ‘Muslims in Calgary’ website.
According to Lisa Daftari, founder of the Foreign Desk news site, Hussein posted the same article on Facebook in May 2016. Facebook removed the post, however, stating “it violated our Community Standards.”
The website ‘Muslims in Calgary’ (MuslimsinCalgary.ca) is privately registered and while it does not have a big following on social media, it states its objective is to “provide leadership and guidance to Muslims in Calgary.”
The professionally designed site is full of controversial articles presenting a strict and fundamentalist interpretation of Islam.
The site provides contact information for several Islamic centres and organizations, as well as for “community sheikhs.” One of these listed sheikhs, Hacene bin Mohamed, told the Sun that his name was added without consultation, and he assumes the same applies to others listed.
“It is good that they are referring people to official imams for help,” he said in an email, “but at the same time we are worried about the accuracy of the information.”
“I do believe the owners live in Calgary,” he continued, “however, it seems that they do not want to disclose their identity.”
There is reason to be concerned about increased incidents of female genital mutilation in Canada. A recent internal CBSA report reveals that border officers have been put on alert to watch for FGM practitioners entering Canada.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently removed the strict warning against FGM in Discover Canada — the citizenship guide given to all newcomers to Canada.
Female Circumcision in Islam – Muslims in Calgary
Muslims in Calgary
Female genital mutilation defended in article on

Man's parents flew from India to reportedly help 'discipline' wife
Postmedia Network
First posted: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 10:27 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 10:34 AM EDT
A Florida man’s parents travelled from India to allegedly aide in abusing their son’s “disobedient” wife.
According to Fox 13, cops allege the man's elders held Silky Gaind against her will while her hubby, Devbir Kalsi, 33, beat her to “counsel and discipline” the woman for being “disobedient.”
Deputies from the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office were dispatched early Saturday morning after receiving a distress call from Gaind, 33.
WUSA 9 reported cops arrived at the family home in Riverview, Fla., and knocked on the door.
When a deputy continued to knock, Gaind attempted to open the door while screaming for help, the Tampa Bay Times reported. The deputy forced his way into the home as Kalsi attempted to shut the door.
Kalsi and his parents – father Jasbir Kalsi, 67, and mother Bhupinder Kalsi, 62 – were detained.
Gaind was found badly beaten with bruises all over her body. An infant inside the home appeared unharmed, Fox 13 reported.
Cops allege Gaind had a knife held to her throat and her cell phone confiscated.
Kalsi was charged with false imprisonment, battery, child abuse and denying access to 911. Jasbir Kalsi was charged with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, child abuse and denying access to 911. Bhupinder Kalsi was charged with battery-domestic violence and failure to report child abuse.
The three accused could be deported back to India.
Devbir Kalsi, along with his parents: mother Bhupinder Kalsi, and father Jasbir Kalsi, were arrested in connection to the beating of Silky Gaind, 33. (Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office)

Deputies Rescue Woman Held Captive and Beaten By Her Family - Story | FOX 13 Tampa Bay
Man, parents held wife, child against will, abused her, deputies say | WUSA9.com
Parents travel from India to help son beat wife, say deputies | Tampa Bay Times
Man's parents flew from India to reportedly help 'discipline' wife | World | New

 

[spaminator]

North Dakota cops called to religious sheep slaughter at apartment complex
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 10:08 AM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 10:34 AM EDT
BISMARCK, N.D. — Bismarck police are looking to the city attorney’s office for guidance after officers responded to a report of sheep being slaughtered in an apartment complex parking area.
Authorities said a couple new to the country was performing a religious ceremony with the sheep on Friday, when the Muslim holiday Eid al-Adha was being celebrated.
No arrests were made, and the couple will not face criminal charges, as no specific city ordinance or health code appeared to have been violated, Assistant City Attorney Jason Hammes told The Bismarck Tribune .
“I didn’t see anything on this that jumped out as over-the-top disorderly,” he said.
However, livestock aren’t allowed to be kept in city limits, and police want to know how to handle such situations in the future.
“We want to be respectful of people’s religious beliefs, but we also want to consider the environment that this is in,” Lt. Steven Scheuer said.
North Dakota cops called to religious sheep slaughter at apartment complex | Wor

 

[spilledthebeer]

North Dakota cops called to religious sheep slaughter at apartment complex
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 10:08 AM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 10:34 AM EDT
BISMARCK, N.D. — Bismarck police are looking to the city attorney’s office for guidance after officers responded to a report of sheep being slaughtered in an apartment complex parking area.
Authorities said a couple new to the country was performing a religious ceremony with the sheep on Friday, when the Muslim holiday Eid al-Adha was being celebrated.
No arrests were made, and the couple will not face criminal charges, as no specific city ordinance or health code appeared to have been violated, Assistant City Attorney Jason Hammes told The Bismarck Tribune .
“I didn’t see anything on this that jumped out as over-the-top disorderly,” he said.
However, livestock aren’t allowed to be kept in city limits, and police want to know how to handle such situations in the future.
“We want to be respectful of people’s religious beliefs, but we also want to consider the environment that this is in,” Lt. Steven Scheuer said.
North Dakota cops called to religious sheep slaughter at apartment complex | Wor

Here is another report from foolish LIE-beral spaminator frantically seeking to make Muslims look less bigoted and misogynist than they really are! With some comments of my own in brackets):

spaminator says: India Supreme Court declares Muslim instant divorce practice 'triple talaq' unconstitutional. Muneeza Naqvi, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. First posted: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 09:44 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 09:55 AM EDT

NEW DELHI — India’s Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the Muslim practice that allows men to instantly divorce their wives as unconstitutional.
The bench, comprising five senior judges of different faiths, deliberated for three months before issuing its order in response to petitions from seven Muslim women who had been divorced through the practice known as triple talaq.
Indian law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said on NDTV that since the court deemed the practice unconstitutional there is no need for any further legislative action by the government.

(That’s nice- a Muslim man may no longer get rid of his wife on 3o seconds notice- but one assumes he is STILL ENTITLED to multiple wives? And I note that the learned judges have NOTHING to say about support or alimony to the wife that it might now take a few days and the requisite govt forms properly filled out before dumping her into the street? And how is it that Muslims are now suddenly adopting this new ruling? Is it in an effort to placate international opinion? A public show and a private truth- that the law will NOT be honestly enforced unless westerners are watching closely? We all know that Muslims consider it their religious right to LIE to non Muslims for the benefit of their religion?)

The decision was widely lauded by women’s rights activists as a step toward granting Muslim women greater equality and justice.
“It’s a very happy day for us. It’s a historic day,” said Zakia Soman, the co-founder of the Indian Muslim Women’s Movement, which was part of the legal battle to end triple talaq. “We, the Muslim women, are entitled to justice from the courts as well as the legislature,” she said.

(Yes- the desperate will grasp at any straws- no matter how small or limited!)
More than 20 Muslim countries, including neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh, have banned the practice. But in India, triple talaq has continued with the protection of laws that allow Muslim, Christian and Hindu communities to follow religious law in matters like marriage, divorce, inheritance and adoption. While most Hindu personal laws have been overhauled and codified over the years, Muslim laws have been left to religious authorities and left largely untouched.
Most of the 170 million Muslims in India are Sunnis governed by Muslim Personal Law for family matters and disputes. Those laws include allowing men to divorce their wives by simply uttering the Arabic word “talaq,” or divorce, three times — and not necessarily consecutively, but at any time, and by any medium, including telephone, text message or social media post.

(And again I ask: what support is available to the divorced woman who is so easily disposed of for any reason- or for no reason at all?)

India’s Muslim Law Board had told the court that while they considered the practice wrong, they opposed any court intervention and asked that the matter be left to the community to tackle. But several progressive Muslim activists decried the law board’s position.

(So local Imams will have final say on this issue- well out of view of cynical westerners!)

“This is the demand of ordinary Muslim women for over 70 years and it’s time for this country to hear their voices,” activist Feroze Mithiborwala told NDTV.
The government supports an end to the practice. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in many public addresses that the practice oppresses Muslim women and needs to be ended.

On Tuesday, Modi took to Twitter to praise the judgment as “historic.”
“It grants equality to Muslim women and is a powerful measure for women empowerment,” he said.

(Yes- I must agree that ANY improvement in the lives of Muslim women- no matter HOW SMALL the change- must be celebrated!)

 

[spilledthebeer]

Here is another report from foolish LIE-beral spaminator frantically seeking to make Muslims look less bigoted and misogynist than they really are! With some comments of my own in brackets):

spaminator says: India Supreme Court declares Muslim instant divorce practice 'triple talaq' unconstitutional. Muneeza Naqvi, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. First posted: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 09:44 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 09:55 AM EDT

NEW DELHI — India’s Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the Muslim practice that allows men to instantly divorce their wives as unconstitutional.
The bench, comprising five senior judges of different faiths, deliberated for three months before issuing its order in response to petitions from seven Muslim women who had been divorced through the practice known as triple talaq.
Indian law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said on NDTV that since the court deemed the practice unconstitutional there is no need for any further legislative action by the government.

(That’s nice- a Muslim man may no longer get rid of his wife on 3o seconds notice- but one assumes he is STILL ENTITLED to multiple wives? And I note that the learned judges have NOTHING to say about support or alimony to the wife that it might now take a few days and the requisite govt forms properly filled out before dumping her into the street? And how is it that Muslims are now suddenly adopting this new ruling? Is it in an effort to placate international opinion? A public show and a private truth- that the law will NOT be honestly enforced unless westerners are watching closely? We all know that Muslims consider it their religious right to LIE to non Muslims for the benefit of their religion?)

The decision was widely lauded by women’s rights activists as a step toward granting Muslim women greater equality and justice.
“It’s a very happy day for us. It’s a historic day,” said Zakia Soman, the co-founder of the Indian Muslim Women’s Movement, which was part of the legal battle to end triple talaq. “We, the Muslim women, are entitled to justice from the courts as well as the legislature,” she said.

(Yes- the desperate will grasp at any straws- no matter how small or limited!)
More than 20 Muslim countries, including neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh, have banned the practice. But in India, triple talaq has continued with the protection of laws that allow Muslim, Christian and Hindu communities to follow religious law in matters like marriage, divorce, inheritance and adoption. While most Hindu personal laws have been overhauled and codified over the years, Muslim laws have been left to religious authorities and left largely untouched.
Most of the 170 million Muslims in India are Sunnis governed by Muslim Personal Law for family matters and disputes. Those laws include allowing men to divorce their wives by simply uttering the Arabic word “talaq,” or divorce, three times — and not necessarily consecutively, but at any time, and by any medium, including telephone, text message or social media post.

(And again I ask: what support is available to the divorced woman who is so easily disposed of for any reason- or for no reason at all?)

India’s Muslim Law Board had told the court that while they considered the practice wrong, they opposed any court intervention and asked that the matter be left to the community to tackle. But several progressive Muslim activists decried the law board’s position.

(So local Imams will have final say on this issue- well out of view of cynical westerners!)

“This is the demand of ordinary Muslim women for over 70 years and it’s time for this country to hear their voices,” activist Feroze Mithiborwala told NDTV.
The government supports an end to the practice. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in many public addresses that the practice oppresses Muslim women and needs to be ended.

On Tuesday, Modi took to Twitter to praise the judgment as “historic.”
“It grants equality to Muslim women and is a powerful measure for women empowerment,” he said.

(Yes- I must agree that ANY improvement in the lives of Muslim women- no matter HOW SMALL the change- must be celebrated!)

And some more thoughts on Muslims- with some special thoughts for Londoners hoping no Muslim bombers live near them!


A while back a Muslim asked in a post: “what concerns you most about Islam”? And the answer to this question is tied into what Donald Trump has said about Muslims-Trump has stated they ought not to be allowed to immigrate to United States. And to that I would add: “they should not be allowed to come to Canada either!” And my reasons are set out below:

Muslims are currently being allowed into Canada because a bunch of stupid, ignorant, greedy, grossly short sighted, vote hungry lousy LIE-BERALS who don’t care that the country is bankrupt- because their leader has told them the economy and deficits will take care of themselves- have allowed you Muslims to immigrate and LIVE HERE!

The world economy is going down the toilet thanks to the gross indebtedness of so many western govts and due to the endless ENTITLEMENTS of so many greedy civil service Hogs! And now Our idiot Boy wants to spend billions (that we don’t have) bringing into Canada a bunch of people who have no more chance of fitting smoothly and completely into Cdn society than a Penguin does with a flock of Seagulls!

I say : “GO HOME, and take your divisive politics and your Sharia `Law`that violates about half the Cdn Constitution and your crude anti Jew propaganda and your insanely selfish desire to blow up the world if you don’t get your own way in ALL THINGS along with you”!

As long as you remain devout old school Muslims you can NEVER be fully assimilated into our country. Your endless wars with other Muslims and with every country in the world that your terror bombers can sneak into render you morally and mentally unfit to reside in a western country at this time. You are like a political and social disease that ought to be quarantined to prevent (or limit) bloodshed and madness.

The great Muslim flaw is this: You insist that Mohammad and the Koran represent the FINAL word of God- no other thought or opinion accepted- and you will behead anybody who opposes you. Roman Catholics once thought that way too-but they (unlike you) have learned to be tolerant and to smile politely when meeting people of other faiths.....the ten commandments-as given by the God you `defend` so strongly are SUPPOSED to guide us all in all key aspects of our lives yet Muslims cherry pick selfishly through the rules that ought to guide them in ALL relations with others.

Roman Catholics gave up burning heretics at the stake hundreds of years ago so we have hope that you Muslims will one day (in a few hundred years? MAYBE?) become civilized enough to give up beheading people you don’t like....... and many of the people ISIS has beheaded are journalists simply trying to tell the Muslim story or else they are AID workers trying to help the many suffering people of your land or they are simply poor Christians who didn’t run fast enough to get out of your way.... and deliberately burning that Jordanian pilot to death in a cage soaked in gas proves you are not fit to live in or vote in any civilized country.

People get killed in war-and war is ugly- but deliberately burning a man who had surrendered to you is beyond savage. The Koran tells us that Allah favours the compassionate and the merciful....where do your absolutist, do it our way or die, political beliefs fit into that? You burned a man (and a fellow Muslim at that) to death simply because you had the power.

The Egyptian born Mohammed Shafia is the poster boy for all that is wrong with letting Muslims immigrate to Canada-Shafia is the guy who murdered his first wife and two daughters by drowning them in Rideau Canal because they were, in his eyes, becoming western style sluts-learning the ways of Cdn women and therefore disgracing HIM! His RIGHT to religious freedom requires him to kill 3 women while OUR Cdn law says it is murder to kill 3 women simply because you don’t like the way they dress or behave in public.

There is NO sensible resolution to such a basic conflict between religious freedom and murder. Also, there is no sensible resolution to the bottom line conflict between the rights granted to Cdn women by our Cdn constitution and the discrimination dumped on women by your Sharia Law. The conflicts are so fundamental it is best that you Muslims NOT be allowed to come to Canada.

We all had such hopes for you and cheered for you when the `Arab spring` came around.....surely your lives would be happier and more peaceful.....but now Egyptian jets are bombing targets in Libya, Saudis are bombing trouble spots in Yemen, there are mass murders in Paris and California organized by hate filled Muslims, the Syrian civil war drags on and the damned Russians are now involved-just what that hate filled region needs-MORE players, the Egyptians have run through a series of governments that each vilify the other, Iraq is split between Sunnis and Shites and Kurds-good Muslims all .....and all wanting to kill the others, with ISIS thrown into the hate filled mix, with a couple of million panic stricken-mostly-Syrian refugees fleeing for their lives....as it stands, you are a bunch of `fcuk-ups` who don’t seem to get much right....about all you do well is hate and make bombs. You cannot work with each other so how do you expect to work with us?

Cdn Lie-berals who think I am being alarmist will one day find their names listed in history books and presented as shameless and monumental screw ups-their empty and irresponsible policies and values mocked and ridiculed....Cdn LIE-berals will be right up there with that other great liberal Brit prime minister Neville Chamberlain who came back from Berlin in 1938, crowing about “peace in our time” right after `selling` Czechoslovakia to Adolf Hitler!

 

[TenPenny]

Muslims are currently being allowed into Canada because a bunch of stupid, ignorant, greedy, grossly short sighted, vote hungry lousy LIE-BERALS who don’t care that the country is bankrupt- because their leader has told them the economy and deficits will take care of themselves- have allowed you Muslims to immigrate and LIVE HERE!

Are you aware that some Muslims immigrated to Canada when Harper was PM?

 

[Durry]

Ever wonder why all these Muslims that are running, crawling etc to everybody else's country, can't get their shit together and build their own shithole rather than going to other people country and wanting to make their country like the shithole they just ran away from????

Speak of dumb and stupid eh

 

[spaminator]

Controversial Islamophobia study by House of Commons committee begins
The Canadian Press
First posted: Monday, September 18, 2017 07:35 AM EDT | Updated: Monday, September 18, 2017 07:50 AM EDT
OTTAWA - Phase two begins this week in the House of Commons’ politically charged debate over combating Islamophobia in Canada.
The heritage committee starts a study on Monday on systemic racism and religious discrimination in Canada.
It was mandated as part of a motion condemning Islamophobia that passed last spring.
The debate around the motion set off showdowns between right and left wing groups on Parliament Hill and saw the Liberal MP who sponsored it receive thousands of hate-laced messages and death threats.
But Liberal MP Hedy Fry, who chairs the committee, said she hopes things are calmer now.
She said all parties worked together to draw up the witness list and are intent on learning and listening.
Controversial Islamophobia study by House of Commons committee begins | Canada |

 

[spilledthebeer]

Are you aware that some Muslims immigrated to Canada when Harper was PM?

Oh yes- and the ones that came under Harper are people like Tarek Fatah who writes for Toronto sun news and other publications and is under a fatwah/death sentence for condemning Muslim radicals! Conservatives made it CLEAR that radical Islam was NOT welcome in Canada! Conservatives stripped Muslim terrorists of Cdn citizenship and GOT RID OF THEM!

TOO BAD idiot LIE-berals have made it clear they WELCOME radicals here and OUR idiot Boy Justin has restored citizenship to CONVICTED Toronto 18 Muslim thugs AND one of idiot Boys first acts after becoming prime minister was to RESTORE funding to terror group Hamas!

Oh Canada- NO LIE-beral stands on guard for you!

 

[Twin_Moose]

Oh yes- and the ones that came under Harper are people like Tarek Fatah who writes for Toronto sun news and other publications and is under a fatwah/death sentence for condemning Muslim radicals! Conservatives made it CLEAR that radical Islam was NOT welcome in Canada! Conservatives stripped Muslim terrorists of Cdn citizenship and GOT RID OF THEM!

TOO BAD idiot LIE-berals have made it clear they WELCOME radicals here and OUR idiot Boy Justin has restored citizenship to CONVICTED Toronto 18 Muslim thugs AND one of idiot Boys first acts after becoming prime minister was to RESTORE funding to terror group Hamas!

Oh Canada- NO LIE-beral stands on guard for you!

He also screened the refugees to be of the oppressed Christian faith

 

[spaminator]

Tarek Fatah takes the M103 fight to Ottawa
By Anthony Furey, Postmedia Network
First posted: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 05:17 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 08:21 PM EDT
Brace yourselves, parliamentarians. Tarek Fatah is coming to town! The popular Toronto-based Sun columnist and media personality is trekking up to Ottawa to testify at the controversial M-103 hearings being held by the heritage committee on Wednesday.
Fatah will be the first major speaker following Liberal MP Iqra Khalid’s Monday appearance that started off the whole process. He’s been a firm critic of the motion that singles out the ill-defined phrase Islamophobia for possible special treatment in its bid to tackle discrimination, writing columns across the Sun chain on the issue.
“I hope to make the MPs realize that if they include the words ‘denouncing Islamophobia’ in their proposals, they will infringe on the inalienable right of Muslim Canadians to critique our religion as has been the rich tradition that has been stifled by Mullahs, Kings and Caliphs by murdering us,” Fatah said Tuesday in advance of the committee hearing.
“Their recommendations must recognize the right of a Muslim to publicly challenge what is rotten in Islamdom and to fight our clergy in the tradition of Martin Luther and Erasmus and before them the 10th century Persian Muslim saint Mansoor Hallaj, beheaded on Islamophobia charges by Mullahs of the time.”
Good luck to any MPs planning to grapple with Fatah in question period after his remarks. The award-winning author doesn’t shy away from controversy.
Earlier this year, a bounty was placed on Fatah’s head for promoting a liberal version of Islam on a popular show he hosted on Indian television. He never backed down.
Fatah’s testimony is set to commence Wednesday at 3:30 p.m. EDT and can be watched live on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage’s website at Welcome to the House of Commons of Canada.
Tarek Fatah takes the M103 fight to Ottawa | Canada | News | Toronto Sun

 

[spaminator]

Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India
THE WASHINGTON POST
First posted: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:13 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:25 AM EDT
NEW DELHI - A member of India's Parliament from the governing Bharatiya Janata Party has said that couples displaying affection in public should be thrown in jail, because such "vulgar" behavior can lead to rape.
"Be it a motorcycle, car or park, couples can be seen behaving in a vulgar fashion. They hug each other as if the girl will eat the boy or the boy will eat the girl," Sakshi Maharaj told reporters Wednesday, according to the Press Trust of India.
"It will be appropriate to take action and put such couples behind bars before anything wrong occurs," he said.
Maharaj, 61, is a controversial saffron-robed religious leader who holds a parliament seat from the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.
He has previously faced charges of rape and murder, and was expelled from the upper house of Parliament on corruption charges. The seat he now holds is in the lower house.
His remarks come at a time when conservatism is rising in majority Hindu India, where new sanctions on consumption of liquor and cow slaughter - anathema to many Hindus - have been put in place. There has also been increased public debate over law enforcement overreaching its role and straying into "moral policing" - with lovers' hotels raided in Mumbai and states setting up "anti-Romeo squads" allegedly to deter harassment.
Maharaj's statements is just the latest in a series of incendiary comments by Indian politicians about sex, women and rape. In recent years, politicians have suggested that mobile phone use or consumption of meat or Chinese food are to blame for rapes or suggested women in the tourist haven of Goa not wear bikinis on the beach "for their own protection."
Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India |

 

[spaminator]

Seven arrested in Egypt for raising rainbow flag at concert
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Monday, September 25, 2017 06:02 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, September 25, 2017 06:07 PM EDT
CAIRO — Egyptian security officials say seven homosexuals have been charged with “inciting immorality” after a concert at which the rainbow flag of the LGBT movement was raised in a rare support of gay rights in conservative Egypt.
The officials say the Monday arrests resulted from Friday’s performance by the Lebanese indy rock band Mashrou’ Leila, whose singer is openly gay.
They say the Supreme State Security Prosecution launched legal proceedings against the seven after authorities discovered they “raised the flag of homosexuals.” The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to brief journalists.
Egyptian law doesn’t explicitly prohibit homosexuality, so prosecutors use alternative charges including “immorality” and “debauchery,” which is normally reserved for prostitution. Homosexuality is a taboo in Egypt among both Muslims and the Christian minority.
Seven arrested in Egypt for raising rainbow flag at concert | World | News | Tor

 

[spaminator]

Saudi Arabia announces plan to allow female drivers by Summer 2018
Abdullah Al-Shihri and Aya Batrawy, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 04:03 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 05:47 PM EDT
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi Arabia on Tuesday announced that women will be allowed to drive for the first time in the ultra-conservative kingdom next summer, fulfilling a key demand of women’s rights activists who faced detention for defying the ban.
The kingdom was the only the country in the world to bar women from driving and for years had garnered negative publicity internationally for detaining women who defied the ban.
The move, which has been welcomed by the United States, represents a significant opening for women in Saudi Arabia, where women’s rights have steadily and slowly gained ground over the years. Saudi women remain largely under the whim of male relatives due to guardianship laws.
King Salman and his young son and heir, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, have tested the waters though, allowing women into the country’s main stadium in the capital, Riyadh, for national day celebrations this month. The stadium had previously been reserved for all-male crowds to watch sporting events. The king and his son have also opened the country to more entertainment and fun.
Women’s rights activists since the 1990s have been pushing for the right to drive, saying it represents their larger struggle for equal rights under the law.
Some ultraconservative clerics in Saudi Arabia, who wield power and influence in the judiciary and education sectors, had warned against allowing women to drive. They argued it would corrupt society and lead to sin.
Women in Saudi Arabia have long had to rely on male relatives to get to work, run errands and simply move around. The more affluent have male drivers and more recently, in major cities, women could access ride hailing apps like Uber and Careem.
The state-run Saudi Press Agency and state TV reported the news late Tuesday evening, saying King Salman decreed that both men and women to be issued drivers’ licences.
Women, however, will not be allowed to obtain licences immediately. A committee will be formed to look into how to implement the new order, which is slated to come into effect in June 2018.
The kingdom had held out on allowing women to drive, despite a number of social openings and gains for women, including granting women the right to vote and run in elections for the first time in late 2015.
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said the U.S. is “happy” with the move, calling it “a great step in the right direction for that country.” She did not comment on whether Saudi Arabia still needs to do more to ensure full rights for its female citizens.
Batrawy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writer Josh Lederman in Washington contributed to this report.
Full text of the Saudi king's royal decree
Your Royal Highness, Minister of Interior:
We take into consideration (or we study) the pros of allowing women to drive and the cons of banning them from driving, while taking into account the necessary legal rules and adhering to them.
We also refer to what the majority of the Council of Senior Scholars agreed on, which is that the original Islamic ruling in regards to women driving is to allow it, and that those who have opposed it have done so based on excuses that are baseless and have no predominance of thought. The scholars see no reason not to allow women to drive as long as there are legal and regulatory guarantees to avoid the pretexts (that those against women driving had in mind), even if they are unlikely to happen.
And because the country - with the help of God - is the guardian of Islamic values, it considers preserving those values one of its priorities, in this matter and in others, and will not hesitate to take any means to ensure the security and safety of its society.
Therefore; adopt the application of the Traffic Regulations and its executive list - which include issuing driving licenses to men and women alike, and forming a high-level committee of ministries (including the Interior Ministry, Finance Ministry, Ministry of Labor and Social Development) to study the necessary steps needed to implement the regulations. The committee must submit its recommendations within 30 days. The implementation - God willing - will be from 10/10/1439 (Islamic date in June 2018) and in accordance with rules and regulations, and the completion of the necessary steps.
http://spa.gov.sa/1671323
Saudi Arabia announces plan to allow female drivers by Summer 2018 | World | New

 

[Durry]

It's just incredible how stupid Muslims are, and they are so fixated on controlling women in one form or another.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

It's just incredible how stupid Muslims are, and they are so fixated on controlling women in one form or another.

Makes a body wonder why you haven't converted yet.

 

[Durry]

Makes a body wonder why you haven't converted yet.

I'm not into controlling women.

Mohammed liked to diddle nine yr olds, maybe that's why these scum are so fixated on women.
Such idiots,,,,, and to have a prophet who is a pedophile.,,,,sick sick sick!!

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

I'm not into controlling women.

Interesting version of "can't."

Mohammed liked to diddle nine yr olds, maybe that's why these scum are so fixated on women.

Newsflash. . . nine-year-olds ain't women.

Such idiots,,,,, and to have a prophet who is a pedophile.,,,,sick sick sick!!

As opposed to one who's a beggar and executed (properly and legally) for sedition and blasphemy.

 

[Durry]

In BC

A charity that runs a Vancouver-area mosque has been penalized by federal regulators after an audit found its former president and imam spent tens of thousands of dollars on personal purchases including a spa, jewelry, video games and hair dye.

The Canada Revenue Agency audit of the Islamic Society of British Columbia also alleged the charity was “controlled or influenced” by a Qatar organization accused of supporting terrorism, although that did not result in a penalty.


The Islamic Society operates the Masjid Al-Hidayah and Islamic Cultural Centre in Port Coquitlam, B.C., and was formerly headed by Saadeldin Bahr, who is now serving a 3-1/2-year prison sentence for a 2013 sexual assault at the mosque.


CRA documents obtained by Global News allege that during the period covered by the audit — Oct. 1, 2010 to Sept. 30, 2013 — Bahr made purchases with his personal credit cards and reimbursed himself with online bank transfers from the charity accounts.

Using this method, he bought a $5,000 “evolution spa therapy,” the CRA said in a letter detailing the audit results that was sent to Bahr and three other directors in June 2016. Auditors said the shipping address for the spa appeared to be Bahr’s home address.

He also bought dish sets, flowers, groceries, pharmacy items, air travel, restaurant meals, car parts, car washes, gas, dry cleaning, a food processor, PlayStation games, an iPad and an iPhone, the CRA letter said.

Although some expenses for which he was reimbursed seemed legitimate, most “appeared to be for personal use,” the letter said. The CRA said they amounted to an “undue benefit” to a board member totalling $127,000 and accused the Society of failing to devote its resources to charitable activities.

The Eid Foundation

The audit documents released by the CRA further said the Sheikh Eid Bin Muhammad Al-Thani Charity Foundation (Eid Foundation) in oil-rich Qatar had “maintained some level of control or influence over the affairs” of the B.C. charity.

“The organization’s connection to and possible control by the Eid Foundation is particularly concerning given that publicly available information … indicates that the Eid Foundation is alleged to have provided support to terrorism,” the CRA Charities Directorate wrote.

“Our research indicates that the Eid Foundation is a member organization in the Union of Good, a global coalition of Islamic charities operated by Hamas, a listed terrorist entity in Canada,” read the letter.

In May, the CRA said in a “Notice of Penalty” letter that while it had initially proposed a $126,000 penalty for Bahr’s spending, it had decided not to follow through after the Islamic Society said it would remove him from the board and improve its internal controls, financial oversight and record keeping.

Etc

https://globalnews.ca/news/3762864/bc-mosque-qatar-terror-relationship/

 

[spilledthebeer]

Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India
THE WASHINGTON POST
First posted: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:13 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:25 AM EDT
NEW DELHI - A member of India's Parliament from the governing Bharatiya Janata Party has said that couples displaying affection in public should be thrown in jail, because such "vulgar" behavior can lead to rape.
"Be it a motorcycle, car or park, couples can be seen behaving in a vulgar fashion. They hug each other as if the girl will eat the boy or the boy will eat the girl," Sakshi Maharaj told reporters Wednesday, according to the Press Trust of India.
"It will be appropriate to take action and put such couples behind bars before anything wrong occurs," he said.
Maharaj, 61, is a controversial saffron-robed religious leader who holds a parliament seat from the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.
He has previously faced charges of rape and murder, and was expelled from the upper house of Parliament on corruption charges. The seat he now holds is in the lower house.
His remarks come at a time when conservatism is rising in majority Hindu India, where new sanctions on consumption of liquor and cow slaughter - anathema to many Hindus - have been put in place. There has also been increased public debate over law enforcement overreaching its role and straying into "moral policing" - with lovers' hotels raided in Mumbai and states setting up "anti-Romeo squads" allegedly to deter harassment.
Maharaj's statements is just the latest in a series of incendiary comments by Indian politicians about sex, women and rape. In recent years, politicians have suggested that mobile phone use or consumption of meat or Chinese food are to blame for rapes or suggested women in the tourist haven of Goa not wear bikinis on the beach "for their own protection."
Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India |

OH GOSH AND GOLLY GEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What will those crazy Indians think of next? The people who wrote the Kama Sutra sex manual want you to do your foreplay AT HOME! In private!

At least the rule applies equally to everybody- and does not discriminate! And considering the number and range of things that poor Indians get up to on the street its clear that such a law is needed! Even in Toronto the Good it is illegal to s++t, p+ss or fornicate on the street!

And in other news, some Muslims on the sub continent have actually altered their divorce laws so it is harder for a Muslim man to dump a wife-of course it is entirely possible that Muslims in smaller cities and villages will smile wisely in the big city and then IGNORE the law when they get back home......but hey- its a start!

But I will not be too excited about Muslims until stuff like this is no longer true of them:::


Here is some very funny-in part because its SO TRUE-stuff I wish I had thought of! Thanks to Jeff Foxworthy!

The "M" word..

Have you ever wondered why it's OK to make jokes about Catholics, Jews, Christians, the Pope, the Irish, the
Italians, the Polish, the Hungarians, the Chinese, the
French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad
golfers, men/women, blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive
to make jokes about the Muslims?

Well, it's time to level the playing field and be
politically incorrect, by including our friends, the
Muslims, on this grandiose list.

So Jeff Foxworthy did his part to include the Muslims on his list ...

1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but morally
object to the use of liquor, You may be a Muslim.

2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket
launcher, but can't afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.

3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.

4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider
bacon to be unclean, You may be a Muslim.

5. If you think vests come in two styles, Bullet-proof and
suicide, You may be a Muslim.

6. If you can't think of anyone that you haven't
declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.

7. If you consider television dangerous, but routinely carry
explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.

8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have
uses, other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a Muslim

9. If you have nothing against women and think every man
should own at least four, then you, too, may be a Muslim.

10. If you find this offensive and do not forward it, you
are part of the problem here in America …but if you delete
this, you are most likely a Muslim.

Freedom Is not Free !

INCOMING GUNFIRE ALWAYS HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY!