Okay ... I confess!... It was I - Henny Penny. For years I have been maligned as a crackpot and stuffed into children's literature. Now do you believe me? The sky is falling!
Wolf
Wolf
Fake CNN video on 9-11
- Thread starter Logic 7
- Start date
It just doesnt, i am not talking about the plane looking bigger than the building, we are talking about the fact that the plane was lower than the building, quite different, try harder.
So you're trying to prove that the US military controls what is broadcast on CNN?
That is, of course, ludicrous.
But let's say you're right.
What are you trying to prove?
I've always found some of the 911 reporting to ring false. I watched it that day and I never believed it was anything but a cover up of some sort. Looking at the info available now (just spent a couple hours watching various vids, reading about it, etc.) I can't help but be convinced there's much more than meets the eye here.
There are just too many unanswered questions. Why was the rubble sold immediately instead of being preserved for investigation? Why did the second tower hit (with less damage) fall first? Why did the buildings fall exactly like a demolition? How can they say that heat caused the collapse when never in the history of a steel and concrete building has one collapsed from heat? Why was there so little coverage of building 7 collapsing? Most people think only 2 buildings fell but there were actually three. Why is there no debris when the plane hit the building? How did it just sink into the side of the building? Why can't the angle of photography be duplicated?
Just too many questions for it to be full disclosure. Ya ya, I've been accused of wearing tinfoil garments and accessories before but something doesn't add up here.
There are just too many unanswered questions. Why was the rubble sold immediately instead of being preserved for investigation? Why did the second tower hit (with less damage) fall first? Why did the buildings fall exactly like a demolition? How can they say that heat caused the collapse when never in the history of a steel and concrete building has one collapsed from heat? Why was there so little coverage of building 7 collapsing? Most people think only 2 buildings fell but there were actually three. Why is there no debris when the plane hit the building? How did it just sink into the side of the building? Why can't the angle of photography be duplicated?
Just too many questions for it to be full disclosure. Ya ya, I've been accused of wearing tinfoil garments and accessories before but something doesn't add up here.
Cosmo, I personally have always thought the conspiracy theorists were the biggest bunch of nut cases to ever walk this insane asylum we call Earth......but you always seemed reasonably sane.....
Check this out:
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
BTW, the buildings didn't fall as if demolished by explosives.......they fell from point of impact down, controlled demolition makes buildings fall bottom up............and no other building collapsed like the WTC because no other building has ever used the same technique of construction........
Talk about ringing false. ;-)
Almost everything you mention is eithor not unusual, or didn't happen. Why wouldn't they sell the rubble? Why would it occur to them to keep it?
"Hey, Joe! Warner's Scrap Metal offered us $3 a pound for the heap" Joe: "nah, lets just keep paying 25 g's a month to store it in case someone thinks maybe it was explosives that brought the building down". You see what's wrong with this picture?
Why would you say the second tower hit was less damaged?
The buildings DIDN'T fall exactly like a demolition.
They didn't say heat caused the collapse, heat was just one factor. When was the last time a building was hit by an airliner full of fuel on the 70th-ish floor - with the weight of another 40 floors of building over it? Take a look at the video of the top of the tower coming loose and starting to drop, and imagine to yourself the scale...just that block of building coming down from the top is larger than the vast majority of highrises in Canada. When you think about it in the proper context, the question becomes "how did it not collapse sooner!"
Building 7 collapsing was highly anti-climactic in context of the events of the day. People were focused on rescueing what they thought would be hundreds of injured in the rubble of the twins. Why would they care about an already evacuated building collapsing? Why would it get a lot of coverage?
There was lots of debris when the plane hit the building.
It didn't "sink" into the side of the building, it disintegrated, merged with, and parts flew through and out the other end of the building.
Why can't the angle of photography be duplicated?
See how easy that was? :smile:
Ahhh Colpy ... had ya fooled, eh? I'm a conspiracy theorist through and through. Ask me about the Catholic church, Roswell, figure skating ... I got theories on em all and a zillion other things.
Seriously, though, there are too many questions. Just the Facts gave me some wonderful answers that followed the party line precisely -- no big surprise there. Unfortunately, the answers are wrong. Watch the videos closely. Weigh the evidence with an open mind. Or not. ~shrug~
I believe it's a cover up. I'm entitled to believe whatever I see fit. As are you all. That's what makes these forums so much fun, ain't it?
I'm a conspiracy theorist through and through. Ask me about the Catholic church, Roswell, figure skating ... I got theories on em all and a zillion other things.Seriously, though, there are too many questions. Just the Facts gave me some wonderful answers that followed the party line precisely -- no big surprise there. Unfortunately, the answers are wrong. Watch the videos closely. Weigh the evidence with an open mind. Or not. ~shrug~
I believe it's a cover up. I'm entitled to believe whatever I see fit. As are you all. That's what makes these forums so much fun, ain't it?
Last edited:
US military has their hand of what is being broadcast since the year of 2000, yes it is true, how come you don't know that?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17437
It is pathetic to see how you people are not informed.
Cosmo, I personally have always thought the conspiracy theorists were the biggest bunch of nut cases to ever walk this insane asylum we call Earth......but you always seemed reasonably sane.....
Check this out:
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
BTW, the buildings didn't fall as if demolished by explosives.......they fell from point of impact down, controlled demolition makes buildings fall bottom up............and no other building collapsed like the WTC because no other building has ever used the same technique of construction........
WRONG WRONG WRONG and WRONG, just like you are.
Your 911myths.com, doesnt even mention who they are,why is that colpy? tell me why, only if you can, which i really doubt.
Full of lies and here is the proof, they say "pull" was used to get the firefighters out of the building, which is a total lie, because according to the FEMA report, there was no firefighters in the building since 11h30 in the morning, about 5 hours before sylverstein used the word "pull it" which is a demolition terms.
Were 366 firefighters, paramedics and police officers just evaporated into some magical death ray void that day? 11h30? 8:45 am - AA flight 11 struck the North tower. 9:03 am - UA flight 175 struck the South tower. 10:05 the South tower collapsed. 10:28 the north tower collapsed. From where do you pull your figures? Mine come from NYFD.
Wolf
16 pages of this silly tripe! There are drugs now to control delusions like the ones posted here..too bad they aren't being proscribed and used:roll: Here's a novel idea: what would you conspiracists say if CNN had camera crews onsite to record the event as it happened?
There's a difference between spin and controlling a network. Of course, to conspiracists, every slight bit of nuance is bulldozed over to established a pre-conceived conclusion.
You still haven't said what you're trying to prove.
:lol::lol:
That isn't "proof."
How do you know what Silverstein said or meant?
Again, every little nuance or every little thing that doesn't fit in exactly in a messy world is seized on by the Fringe as proof positive to substantiate a pre-conceived worldview.
Everything in 911myths is a rational and calm rebuttal to virtually every argument the conspiracists make, so they make ad hominem attacks on the site because the reason and logic in the rebuttals destroy the fantasy world created by the conspiracists.
There is absolutely no possibility that noLogic23 will change its point of view, so there is no point in discussing this, other than the amusement in prolonging a thread that won't die.
Personally, I believe that all three buildings are actually still there, they were simply transferred to another dimension by aliens disguised as jets. These same aliens abducted the passengers on all four flights, and took them to another world.
Anyone who doesn't believe that is obviously being duped by the Bush military/industrial scheme, and can't see the evidence right in front of them.
Can you prove me wrong?
Personally, I believe that all three buildings are actually still there, they were simply transferred to another dimension by aliens disguised as jets. These same aliens abducted the passengers on all four flights, and took them to another world.
Anyone who doesn't believe that is obviously being duped by the Bush military/industrial scheme, and can't see the evidence right in front of them.
Can you prove me wrong?
Pull? Pull it? I say "Pull" when I'm shooting skeet. As a trucker, "pull the pin" meant quittin' time. Pull it ... pull the plug, shut it down, get T/F outa there! Those li'l signs on public building doors must really have you jumpy. Pull!
I stand by my Henny Penny conspiracy theory....
Wolf
I stand by my Henny Penny conspiracy theory....
Wolf
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17437
I am sorry, this is not about spin, read the whole article, it will help.
The cnn video was fake, it is about 10 times you ask me the same questions, it is about time you get a grip my friend.
Because i did my own little reasearch , i don't let the governement or any other retarded institute to tell me what to think, and here is the proof again and again.
sylverstein pull
What pull means
Secondly when conspiracist came with this, sylverstein came with an explanation a year after, saying that pull meant the firefighters to get out of the building,but the big problem with this explanation, it is just impossible, according to fema report there was no firefighers in wtc 7 since 11h30 in the morning, this is called doing his homework my toro.
911 myths doesnt even mention who they are, means no credibility, and no they don't cover all the event, try harder.