Extreme weather and drought.

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
Until recently, many scientists spoke of climate change mainly as a “threat,” sometime in the future. But it is increasingly clear that we already live in the era of human-induced climate change, with a growing frequency of weather and climate extremes like heat waves, droughts, floods and fires.
Future precipitation trends, based on climate model projections for the coming fifth assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, indicate that droughts of this length and severity will be commonplace through the end of the century unless human-induced carbon emissions are significantly reduced. Indeed, assuming business as usual, each of the next 80 years in the American West is expected to see less rainfall than the average of the five years of the drought that hit the region from 2000 to 2004.
That extreme drought (which we have analyzed in a new study in the journal Nature-Geoscience) had profound consequences for carbon sequestration, agricultural productivity and water resources: plants, for example, took in only half the carbon dioxide they do normally, thanks to a drought-induced drop in photosynthesis.
In the drought’s worst year, Western crop yields were down by 13 percent, with many local cases of complete crop failure. Major river basins showed 5 percent to 50 percent reductions in flow. These reductions persisted up to three years after the drought ended, because the lakes and reservoirs that feed them needed several years of average rainfall to return to predrought levels.
In terms of severity and geographic extent, the 2000-4 drought in the West exceeded such legendary events as the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. While that drought saw intervening years of normal rainfall, the years of the turn-of-the-century drought were consecutive. More seriously still, long-term climate records from tree-ring chronologies show that this drought was the most severe event of its kind in the western United States in the past 800 years. Though there have been many extreme droughts over the last 1,200 years, only three other events have been of similar magnitude, all during periods of “megadroughts.”
Most frightening is that this extreme event could become the new normal: climate models point to a warmer planet, largely because of greenhouse gas emissions. Planetary warming, in turn, is expected to create drier conditions across western North America, because of the way global-wind and atmospheric-pressure patterns shift in response.
Indeed, scientists see signs of the relationship between warming and drought in western North America by analyzing trends over the last 100 years; evidence suggests that the more frequent drought and low precipitation events observed for the West during the 20th century are associated with increasing temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere.
These climate-model projections suggest that what we consider today to be an episode of severe drought might even be classified as a period of abnormal wetness by the end of the century and that a coming megadrought — a prolonged, multidecade period of significantly below-average precipitation — is possible and likely in the American West.
The current drought plaguing the country is worryingly consistent with these expectations. Although we do not attribute any single event to global warming, the severity of both the turn-of-the-century drought and the current one is consistent with simulations accounting for warming from increased greenhouse gases. The Northern Hemisphere has just recorded its 327th consecutive month in which the temperature exceeded the 20th-century average. This year had the fourth-warmest winter on record, with record-shattering high temperatures in March. And 2012 has already seen huge wildfires in Colorado and other Western states. More than 3,200 heat records were broken in June alone.
And yet that may be only the beginning, a fact that should force us to confront the likelihood of new and painful challenges. A megadrought would present a major risk to water resources in the American West, which are distributed through a complex series of local, state and regional water-sharing agreements and laws. Virtually every drop of water flowing in the American West is legally claimed, sometimes by several users, and the demand is expected to increase as the population grows.
Many Western cities will have to fundamentally change how they acquire and use water. The sort ofhttp://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/extreme-weather-and-drought-are-here-to-stay.html?_r=1 temporary emergency steps that we grudgingly adopt during periods of low rainfall — fewer showers, lawn-watering bans — will become permanent. Some regions will become impossible to farm because of lack of irrigation water. Thermoelectric energy production will compete for limited water resources.
There is still time to prevent the worst; the risk of a multidecade megadrought in the American West can be reduced if we reduce fossil-fuel emissions. But there can be little doubt that what was once thought to be a future threat is suddenly, catastrophically upon us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/o...eather-and-drought-are-here-to-stay.html?_r=1
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
An op-ed piece. Part of the campaign of Financiers to rule the world through Carbon Credits.. by buying off failed academics and pagan occultists.. who pander their LIES.

There's nothing to worry about there, there is NO AGW, and there is no extreme weather that has not been experienced in cycles over the geological history of the Earth.. The only thing certain about that.. is it has NOTHING to do with carbon... a fractional element in the earth's atmosphere.
 
Last edited:

Scooby

Electoral Member
Mar 22, 2012
403
0
16
Alberta
So whatever water left in Canada that has not been contaminated by resource industries has already been dealt away by government agreements. They saw this coming. Nothing will stop the already wealthy from seeking more wealth at the expense of the land and the populations that live there. The future is here, might as well get used to it.
 

beaker

Electoral Member
Jun 11, 2012
508
0
16
thepeacecountry
More than six becomes propaganda and self defeating

Why do you think so, what harm is there in additional threads? There is a brand spanking new National every night. If we had to wade through the last 50 years worth of information, no matter how valid at the time, in order to get to the latest information about the doings of Harpers governing Conservatives, how many of us would bother. And Anthropogenic Climate Change is a lot more relevant than the Tories.

IPCC - Activities

"One of the main IPCC activities is the preparation of comprehensive assessment reports about the state of scientific, technical and socioeconomic knowledge on climate change, its causes, potential impacts and response strategies."

"The decision to prepare a Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) was taken by the IPCC at its 28th Session in April 2008. Compared to previous reports, the AR5 will put greater emphasis on assessing the socio-economic aspects of climate change and implications for sustainable development, risk management and the framing of a response through both adaptation and mitigation. It will aim to provide more detailed information on regions, including on climate phenomena such as monsoons and El Nino. To enhance overall integration some aspects including water and the Earth system, carbon cycle; ice sheets and sea-level rise; and Article 2 of the UNFCCC will be addressed in a cross cutting manner. Attention will also be given to consistent evaluation of uncertainties and risks; costing and economic analysis; and treatment of scenarios."

So four years so far in the making, out there for public review, getting more comprehensive data and opinion all the time. It is worth bringing up when the material being researched turns up important new points like those shown in the opening post.
 

eh1eh

Blah Blah Blah
Aug 31, 2006
10,749
103
48
Under a Lone Palm
Global warming is happening. It has happened before. The thermometer doesn't lie.
The CO2 levels have increased, obviously, due to human activity.
Does this mean the current warming trend is caused by the increased CO2? We just don't know for sure.
Does this mean there is not a warming trend? Duh. See thermometer comment above.
It is a circle of doubt and uncertainty.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,241
9,605
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
More than six becomes propaganda and self defeating

Why do you think so, what harm is there in additional threads? There is a brand spanking new National every night. If we had to wade through the last 50 years worth of information, no matter how valid at the time, in order to get to the latest information about the doings of Harpers governing Conservatives, how many of us would bother. And Anthropogenic Climate Change is a lot more relevant than the Tories.....


...to you. A couple years back, there where something like 50+ current
(& close to current) Threads on Isreal, Palestine, the Middle East, and
the whole ball of hate that goes with it...frequented by the same 8-10
people pretty much exclusively. Any other Thread on any other topic
got pushed off the front page in no time flat.

Same thing happened for some reason with the Haiti Earthquake...

Same thing happened with RCMP Tazer'n that Polish dude in the
Vancouver airport...

Weirdly, above, most multiple threads on the same topic where started
by the same very few people, & they'd be able (to themselves) to justify
it 'cuz they perceived some minor difference in articles, or whatever.

If this was solely the Anthropogenic Global Climate Cooling Warming
Changing Forum exclusively, then yeah, fill your boots and create 100
Threads on the same topic 'cuz the only people there would only be
interested in that one topic only anyway. Members could copy&paste
what they thought of as a witty responce into their top 10 favorite
Threads on the same-same subject, and it just might fit...and bump
the other Threads (all on the same subject) off the front page.

Sounds awesome, eh? This happens to not be solely the Anthropogenic
Global Climate Cooling Warming Changing Forum exclusively though,
so we try to use some common sense, and check for existing threads
on the same topic before creating another on the exact same topic or
news story. Sometimes you miss seeing it though & that happens. A
Mod can merge them if need be.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Ron

I'm happy with our weather. How about you?

Love'n it! Two months 'till the first snow though (which will melt but come
to stay just under three weeks after that)....unless that has changed.

Ah, optimism. That'll be the cue for one of the 8-10 or however many to pop in here and tell us just how very wrong we are.

It is, no pun intended, as regular as the seasons.