thulin said:
before wasting your time analyzing a huge material, ask yourself "is this a likely scenario"?
At the beginning, it was a known fact that three years before 9/11, the Project for a New American Century had speculated how a treacherous attack “like Pearl Harbour” could greatly accelerate the dismantling of America’s traditional rights and values, thus bringing their plans to fruition for a new America, to which the Bush Administration has since been busy leading the country.
When, less than a year following Bush and his PNAC puppet-masters having achieved the White House, just such an attack “like Pearl Harbour” took place, it appeared to be much too fortuitous to be true. And yet, few could give credence to the suspicion that any group of American leaders could be so perfidious as to destroy American lives and property with the aim of producing an incident that would permit them to activate their desired changes in policy.
Over the five plus years since then, the treachery and deceitfulness of the Bush Administration and its Neocon supporters, who developed out of the original PNAC plot, have gradually convinced an increasing number of observers to reappraise their original rejection of their suspicions aroused by that alarming coincidence.
Personally, I have still not managed to convince myself to fully embrace that particular theory, bult alternately, I have not been able to casually dismiss it.
There is no need to post such vehement rejections. If they are tinfoil hats, they are already doomed to failure. If they prove their suspicions correct, it would of a great discovery for everyone, except the spawn of PNAC.
Meanwhile, they are no more objectionable than the JFK Theorists, Luna Landing Objectors, and the Flat-Earthers.
At least those nutters aren’t trying to legislate their unproven beliefs in the school curriculum.