Well Elton John has admitted to sexual encounters with hundreds of men, and spent a good part of the 80s and 90s addicted to cocaine. He seems a classic case of profligate homosexual lifestye.. except he's rich.. instead of an aging, impoverished recluse. The average number of sexual partners for heterosexual men in the West prior to marriage is 4, usually in the context of an extended relationship.. for homosexuals it is a 1000+, almost all anonymous and singular. Homosexual 'marriages' seldom involve any form of fidelity.. hence they are mere conveniences.. platforms for promiscuity. Misery seeks company.. and these 'marriages' are mere cases of companions in misery.
.... he retorts with his usual unfounded opinions.
BTW, Bozo, how many hetero marriages are there not based upon fidelity? How many hetero marriages are miserable? How many heteros are running around jumping everything they see that walks on two legs? How many rich and famous heteros haven't had a bit of drug in their life? Like I said, so far, all you've shown in your impressively ignorant opinion. Prove Elton John and David Furnish are miserable or shut the fuk up.
Don't hold your breath, karrie. As for homosexual priests... you are correct in saying that the definition of a homosexual for the Church is one who actually practices homosexuality.. however.. the inclination to homosexuality is deemed to be a sign of a severely disordered identity and profound sexual immaturity and is inconsistent with a call to the priesthood. Since the abuse scandal prospective priests are given a battery of tests and in depth interviews to determine the authenticity of their vocation. If any deep orientation to or fascination with homosexuality is detected.. the candidate will be excluded. That's the policy.
Yeah, well, like I said, the RCC isn't exactly caught up to reality.
That seems to back up what i said. Deep orientation to homosexuality.. no ordination.
Nono, you went past that and keep omitting the fact that ordination is ALSO denied to sexually active hetero. Boy, that's some filter you've got in your tiny little hazelnut shell of a mind.
which is in this case.. both profoundly unnatural
attaboy, keep sticking to that profound ignorance.
That's not the policy, karrie.
In your opinion, but then you have that massive filter which dictates to you only the parts you want to see which affects your opinion immensely.
Most men, even priests.. have inclinations to healthy sexuality.. within a chaste family life at its most constructive. That is the nature of a sacrificial priesthood.. it involves giving up through celibacy this divine and natural gift.
And you are saying that homosexuals can't sacrifice. You're fulla sh|t.
A committed homosexual.. deeply oriented to the disorder.. although celibate.. is still ineligible for the priesthood in a strict sense. Sure some get through.... but so do priests who are thieves, murderers...
According to you. your opinion is no big deal.