Europe: Birthplace of humans
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
Little racist who denies climate change with his dying breath suddenly trusts the science in this study.
Europe may have walked away from life in the trees but the picked up the ways of the predator along the way. Is the is the same EU that has been at war since before the time of Jesus?? I''m not holding my breath that they will make it this time. How can you win when the banksters join up with whomever is winning at the moment. Commonly called France in those times as to not taint the name of Belgium but they are the ones pulling the strings in France all along. Who else would surrender in every war, sometimes more than once in a long war? Sooner or later people will notice and begin to talk and rightly so.
You call this globalist coup climate change crap science?
wow!
My total and complete disrespect for you just hit a new low.
You are quite the racist yourself, no matter how you like to paint yourself up, so you can shut up on that "accuse" eh?
Its nice that this Africa myth, like myths should, has finally bit the dust.
Last edited:
Isn't the Telegraph a cheesy tabloid rag?
I never did buy into the out of Africa theory but... Europe? Sounds like white supremacist BS. As far as I'm concerned, humans evolved all over the planet. American archaeology has been ham strung by the Bering Straight theory for a few hundred years and only recently have they begun to dig deeper and find much older evidence, most recently, one in the US that is 130,000 years old. It won't be long before they find that people evolved here at the same time as anywhere else.
I never did buy into the out of Africa theory but... Europe? Sounds like white supremacist BS. As far as I'm concerned, humans evolved all over the planet. American archaeology has been ham strung by the Bering Straight theory for a few hundred years and only recently have they begun to dig deeper and find much older evidence, most recently, one in the US that is 130,000 years old. It won't be long before they find that people evolved here at the same time as anywhere else.
When you mix colors using paint, or through the printing process, you are using the subtractive color method. The primary colors of light are red, green, and blue. If you subtract these from white you get cyan, magenta, and yellow. Mixing the colors generates new colors as shown on the color wheel, or the circle on the right. Mixing these three primary colors generates black. As you mix colors, they tend to get darker, ending up as black. The CMYK color system (cyan, magenta, yellow, and black) is the color system used for printing.
Paint is not light. Paint absorbs all light except for the shade you see which is reflected as a single colour.
Now go be a good slave and consume.
Now go be a good slave and consume.
Yep, not to be taken seriously. That's very bad science reporting too, it's not proof that humans and chimps diverged from a common ancestor in Europe, that's still a very tentative hypothesis.
Evolution doesn't work that way, it's simply inconceivable that separate breeding populations would evolve into the same species in isolation from each other.
Reminds me of those Christians who believe that Jesus was in England. Whatever it takes to believe yourself special.
And did those feet in ancient times
Walk upon England's mountains green.
And did those feet in ancient times
Walk upon England's mountains green.
The oldest rock is 4.4 Ga. Anything beyond is an assumption which could be 700 to 1000Ga going by zircon inclusions and radio decay.
There is no set age.
4,005,000,000BC, 14 days after the first new moon following the first equinox but whose counting? Thursday if it happened to be the year that a double Sabbath happened.
That is about the same amount of energy that is put forward in many of the 'sciences'. They are designed to make the discoveries as slow and as expensive as possible. More often than not the inventions are used to harm some segment of the human culture and the odds are the ones it is used on help fund the funding of the method used to kill them. That can be lack of available medical attention as well as being bombed into pieces.
That also means that 'science' as a whole is not an independent organism as scientists come from the same academy of learning that is available only to those who attend 'private schools'. They are bought and paid for and their task is to keep things running just like they are and the broken parts are meant to be broken and to stay broken as it keeps something of value from a group that is under domination through such devices. Should the others wake up the game would be over in short order and if that requires taking the world back to the stone-age the ones being trampled on will still see that as the better option so the elite can't say the revolt came as a surprise.
Let's say that 4.5B years ago the earth existed as a ball of molten rock and metal about 1/2 the diameter it is today and spinning at a higher rate and high tides in the lava caused by a moon that was much closer than it is today.
In that possible situation would it be acting like a delicate centrifuge where the lava was sorting itself into layers based the application of gravity and over a few billion years the rocks with banding appear to be laid out on the bottom of a layer of water.
Water came to the earth in the form of dirty ice and the radiation of heat from a ball of lava would melt the ice before it could impact the ground. Any solids would continue to the ground. The water vapor would not have to rise very far before the cold of space on an earth with no atmosphere or air and again that situation lasted a long time, say a few 100M years before liquid water could be found on the cooling earth and the water would fall on the highest bit of land rather than pooling in the lowest regions that would still be the hottest spots on the globe, perhaps 450M years before it began to pool in the lowest regions of an earth that has a diameter about 5/8of what it is now.
In 450,000,000BC with all the water we have and all the air we have would the climate be one that could support a lot of green food readily available. To make use of that food would be creatures that could eat lots and they would be breathing air at a pressure that is much higher at sea-level than it is today.
From the artistic scientist would come the promotion lots of air and lots of food would make for a being that uses 100% of their brain capacity and the lack of food made the same beings smaller (the size ration of birds today and dinos from the past could be used to establish some baselines so it isn't all opinion alone) What they did with that available energy is more than a little debatable.
From the evil scientist comes, . . . nothing and anything good it encounters it tries to wreck or bury, whichever is more permanent.
Guess where all that leads you??
The only thing good that came out of Europe is silence. Come on, Holy Wars that lasted 1,000 years and counting? Pirates as an eternal enemy who became best friends as soon 'the homeland' was under attack. Their covert relationship might have even been the birth of the 'Black Market' as before that only the elite even knew the size of the world let alone the goodies that only they had access to.
That is about the same amount of energy that is put forward in many of the 'sciences'. They are designed to make the discoveries as slow and as expensive as possible. More often than not the inventions are used to harm some segment of the human culture and the odds are the ones it is used on help fund the funding of the method used to kill them. That can be lack of available medical attention as well as being bombed into pieces.
That also means that 'science' as a whole is not an independent organism as scientists come from the same academy of learning that is available only to those who attend 'private schools'. They are bought and paid for and their task is to keep things running just like they are and the broken parts are meant to be broken and to stay broken as it keeps something of value from a group that is under domination through such devices. Should the others wake up the game would be over in short order and if that requires taking the world back to the stone-age the ones being trampled on will still see that as the better option so the elite can't say the revolt came as a surprise.
That won't stop Europeans from adopting it as good science though. The data that science provides today can be used to support certain concepts with a fair degree of accuracy.
Let's say that 4.5B years ago the earth existed as a ball of molten rock and metal about 1/2 the diameter it is today and spinning at a higher rate and high tides in the lava caused by a moon that was much closer than it is today.
In that possible situation would it be acting like a delicate centrifuge where the lava was sorting itself into layers based the application of gravity and over a few billion years the rocks with banding appear to be laid out on the bottom of a layer of water.
Water came to the earth in the form of dirty ice and the radiation of heat from a ball of lava would melt the ice before it could impact the ground. Any solids would continue to the ground. The water vapor would not have to rise very far before the cold of space on an earth with no atmosphere or air and again that situation lasted a long time, say a few 100M years before liquid water could be found on the cooling earth and the water would fall on the highest bit of land rather than pooling in the lowest regions that would still be the hottest spots on the globe, perhaps 450M years before it began to pool in the lowest regions of an earth that has a diameter about 5/8of what it is now.
In 450,000,000BC with all the water we have and all the air we have would the climate be one that could support a lot of green food readily available. To make use of that food would be creatures that could eat lots and they would be breathing air at a pressure that is much higher at sea-level than it is today.
From the artistic scientist would come the promotion lots of air and lots of food would make for a being that uses 100% of their brain capacity and the lack of food made the same beings smaller (the size ration of birds today and dinos from the past could be used to establish some baselines so it isn't all opinion alone) What they did with that available energy is more than a little debatable.
From the evil scientist comes, . . . nothing and anything good it encounters it tries to wreck or bury, whichever is more permanent.
Guess where all that leads you??
The only thing good that came out of Europe is silence. Come on, Holy Wars that lasted 1,000 years and counting? Pirates as an eternal enemy who became best friends as soon 'the homeland' was under attack. Their covert relationship might have even been the birth of the 'Black Market' as before that only the elite even knew the size of the world let alone the goodies that only they had access to.
Something spacey apparently. Good thing the question wasn't about how God's (and the Holy Spirit's) parents fit into the picture of 'evolution'. It should work out that even Dexter gets to be 'the seed' of something that lasts for eternity and then some.
What's wrong with taking a proven scientific fact (how things work today) and applying it to different subjects? One version will be much better than all the ones that aren't part of the thing we call 'the truth'.
What's wrong with taking a proven scientific fact (how things work today) and applying it to different subjects? One version will be much better than all the ones that aren't part of the thing we call 'the truth'.