Elizabeth Warren - The Two Income Trap:

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
It's your math bub. In the real world you can't have a positive until the negative is eliminated. I did notice similarities but more importantly I can grasp the differences which mandate the need for two terms to describe two seperate scenarios. Someday maybe you will.

No, you are definitely math challenged. The negative from a recession is the change, or derivative. Consecutive quarters with negative growth. The American economy is not at negative GDP or jobs, it lost some sure, measured as a % change. You can't have a total workforce of -100,000, that is a nonsense figure, you can have a loss of 100,000 jobs, sure. Or a gain of 100,000 jobs...now it's gaining, that's a positive derivative. That is growth, and it is also recovery.

In the real world, economists track changes in this way. While an economy is recovering it is adding jobs, it is adding GDP, it is growing again. Economists track the economic activity in a nation by looking at the trajectory of the economy. It's growing when the economy is adding new jobs, and adding to GDP. Whether or not it is a recovery or not, an economy can still be measured in terms of growth or contraction.

That's it for me, I'm bored with this thread jack now.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The U.S. economy will grow faster in 2012 — if it isn't knocked off track by upheavals in Europe, according to an Associated Press survey of leading economists.

Unemployment will barely fall from the current 8.6 percent rate, though, by the time President Barack Obama runs for re-election in November, the economists say.

The three dozen private, corporate and academic economists expect the economy to grow 2.4 percent next year. In 2011, it likely grew less than 2 percent.

The year is ending on an upswing. The economy has generated at least 100,000 new jobs for five months in a row — the longest such streak since 2006.
Economists see growth picking up in new year - Business - Eye on the Economy - msnbc.com
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
It's an economy stupid. They don't "grow" until they surpass the benchmark prior to losses.

I hope you old lady manages your money.
So the economy will likely never grow, according to you because it likely will never reach the peak it did around the end of WW2. roflmao
And a skink won't experience growth ever again after losing its tail once.
Unemployment didn't grow in 2008, it only recovered.
F'ing hilarious.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economicgrowth.asp#axzz1nQHkmP00
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,936
14,435
113
Low Earth Orbit
Yeah it is ****ing hillarious. You just never give up no matter how ****ing wrong you are but I admire you tenacity.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I'm hetro as well even if I weren't, cute or not, I'd stay the hell away strictly based on your perceptions of "growth" and extra the toe.
Boy, am I glad to read that! I wouldn't want to catch that "screwy logic" affliction of yours.
Hair doesn't grow, right? It only recovers?

https://members.weforum.org/pdf/ict/ICT for Growth.pdf

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...easury-forecasts/story-e6frg926-1226216741240

European growth and renewal: The path from crisis to recovery | McKinsey Global Institute | Productivity, Competitiveness, & Growth | McKinsey & Company
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
That's what you're trying to tell me and hair isn't an economy is it?
You cutting off your hair means you are losing it. The stuff cut is gone but it starts growing on your head again. Whatever amount you had before is irrelevant to it growing back.
Like I said, according to your idiotic reasoning, the economy will likely never grow again after the peak it reached after WW2.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,936
14,435
113
Low Earth Orbit
You cutting off your hair means you are losing it. The stuff cut is gone but
it starts growing on your head again
GDP isn't the end all be all. It's an economy. What happens when you throw in inflation and other heavy hitters that make up the over all positive and negatives of an economy?

Sticking with your "hair" thing, how do you go into a negative? Tear out the roots and tissue of the scalp?
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Jeeeeez. Haircut = the negative. I'm not surprised that you seem to think getting rid of hair isn't a negative impact on its quantity.
"Wayne Swan said yesterday's official national accounts, showing that the economy grew by 1 per cent in the September quarter and at an annual rate of almost 5 per cent over the past six months, were the best set of growth figures he had seen since Australia emerged from the global financial crisis." http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...easury-forecasts/story-e6frg926-1226216741240 AU still hasn't reached its previous economic level, though.

"Europe is growing again, but the recovery is uneven and under threat from the continuing eurozone debt crisis. Europe has significant strengths on which to build but needs to address profound long-term challenges that could limit its future growth. MGI sets out a perspective on where the European economy stands today, the challenges it faces, and the very considerable strengths on which it can build. MGI also sets out seven priorities for action. Each requires joint action by policy makers and business leaders." European growth and renewal: The path from crisis to recovery | McKinsey Global Institute | Productivity, Competitiveness, & Growth | McKinsey & Company It's still not as healthy as it was.


GDP growth is a good indicator of economic growth.