Duffy found not guilty of charges of fraud, breach of trust
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
I'm not so sure about that. Should possible misuses of taxpayers money always lead to a full blown trial?
Was it a "bribe cheque"???
One of my favourite examples of delivering justice and truth doesn't matter is the mayerthorpe 4 inquiry,this case examples the capacity of the pc party to manipulate Justice
If you are going to write a letter to the higher echelons of Gov't you might get someone to proof read it before dropping it in the mail.
I think Angstrom has answered your question. I think there's already a few criteria in place to satisfy before proceeding to trial. A couple that come to mind are - is there a good chance of conviction? AND is the public good served well by the expense? A third one might be with the shortage of personnel and facilities, cases to proceed must be chosen according to satisfying the criteria!
Give me a break I just purchased a I phone,just listen to the content not how it is delivered,as far as writing the upper crust of Ottawa,I do not believe you
Auditors?where are these auditors to begin with?
Auditors?where are these auditors to begin with?
I think Angstrom has answered your question. I think there's already a few criteria in place to satisfy before proceeding to trial. A couple that come to mind are - is there a good chance of conviction? AND is the public good served well by the expense? A third one might be with the shortage of personnel and facilities, cases to proceed must be chosen according to satisfying the criteria!
.. And I answered Angstrom's comment. Further, obviously all the criteria were in place as the trial did proceed.
I'll ask you again, with your remarkably high standard of the suspect being deemed guilty in advance, then why bother at all?
whistleblowers, etc. i shamelessly plucked the whole lot in with auditors.
Believing me is beside the point! I've copied a sentence of your own drivel for you to contemplate............."i think I am going to write the justice proceeding over this circus and remind him he was wh ores and looked foolish doing it."
Oooooooh ooooh, I've trespassed on Walter's political domain!
We arnt saying to not bother at all.
We are saying let's not blow thing out proportion.
Thanks for the reviewBelieving me is beside the point! I've copied a sentence of your own drivel for you to contemplate............."i think I am going to write the justice proceeding over this circus and remind him he was wh ores and looked foolish doing it."
Oooooooh ooooh, I've trespassed on Walter's political domain!
It's the job of a political leader to win the election. Anyone surprised that Harper was in major damage control mode has to automatically be a candidate for 2016 biggest twit award.
It's what his job is. That's what you do :lol:
Not just Harper. All of them
It's what his job is. That's what you do :lol:
Not just Harper. All of them
It's the job of a political leader to win the election. Anyone surprised that Harper was in major damage control mode has to automatically be a candidate for 2016 biggest twit award.
It's what his job is. That's what you do :lol:
Not just Harper. All of them
Can't totally agree there Angstrom- I think it's the political leader's job to do what is best for the electorate (which indirectly, might be instrumental in winning elections)
Ummmmmmmmmmm...............................Nope!
Can't totally agree there Angstrom- I think it's the political leader's job to do what is best for the electorate (which indirectly, might be instrumental in winning elections)Ummmmmmmmmmm...............................Nope!
If only our electorate was that intelligent. :lol:
When the judge speaks of Harper in full damage control mode that would make a military commander proud.
This is what they do. All of them. When your in election mode. It's like going to war. Everything public perception, is analyzed.
The judge and the electorate have no idea the work that's put into winning a election.