Drunken female thugs attack homeless man in the street
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
So you don't want to officially admit something which you almost - whether advertently and inadvertently - almost admitted anyway.
It doesn't matter anyway. What you really think has all been made clear to all and sundry.
Why? Is he not allowed to defend himself?
If a group of female thugs started attacking and sexually assaulting me for no good reason in the street I'll knock their teeth out and pummel them into the tarmac. And they'll get everything they deserve.
Seeing you being attacked by a woman would be hilarious. You'd meekly stand there and take the beating like a huge Jessy.
So all corgis don't possess teeth or testicles, do they? Are you sure about that?
Anyway, I'd rather describe myself as a pitbull (one who admires the Queen and all royals). When I bite I never let go.
He did a great job of defending himself. Had he fought back, he'd be sitting in the pokey as the assailant rather than walking free as a victim.
No, he didn't. He had to have another gang of girls pulling the thugs away, which is also embarassing in itself. If he'd done a great job in defending himself they'd have been sparked out on the floor with burst lips, mascara running and spitting teeth out.
Only if the police hadn't done their jobs properly. And CCTV would have caught everything and proved he was defending himself from a gang of drunken thugs.
He defended himself by doing the right thing but I'm not sure if you know what the right thing is.
I want to hear what you got. What will you do if the admission you so desperately crave is not forthcoming? Go out with your BNP buddies and stomp a non-white to death?
It certainly don't. What I really think is beyond your pathetically limited powers of comprehension.
You have got to be the hardest man on the internet.
I said "the Royal Corgis." You don't read so good, do you? Guess the GCSE didn't cover reading comprehension.
Stupid and vicious? I'll go along with that.
Wow Blackleaf's on the rampage now... He's so upset in here that while he lashes out at everybody in here who doesn't agree with him (..... Which is everybody).... In his whirlwind attack he even swung around back to my post from a few days ago to throw me a neg rep for good measure.
He either completely overlooked it for so long or
Normally I would have just ignored the neg rep and understand why he gave it, but after reading up the last few posts, it all makes sense now.
He really mad
He either completely overlooked it for so long or
Normally I would have just ignored the neg rep and understand why he gave it, but after reading up the last few posts, it all makes sense now.
He really mad
Nah, is some b*tch came out of nowhere and started attacking me, she'd be knocked Tha fk out.
I don't care who it is or their screwed up reasons, I have the right to protect myself and those I care about from violent idiots.
Respecting a guy for not fighting back and getting their azz kicked because of gender difference is only promoting dated sexism and further future attacks on men by women who know they can get away with it.
I may disagree with Blackleaf's connection between the OP and Feminism, but I am aware of certain issues that come from gender inequality that negatively impact on males which most either don't want to talk about, or twist into some old fashion male chivalry to be respected.
And I'll stand by what I say - Feminism is the cause of the rise in the ladette, a group of whom drunkenly attacked an innocent homeless man in the street after they stumbled out of a pub blathered with their knickers around their ankles..
Such behaviour - getting absolutely blathered and then stumbling out of a pub not knowing what day it is, shouting, screaming, swearing, and then attacking innocent passers-by - was, twenty and thirty years ago, almost exclusively the preserve of men.
Over the last ten years or so, however, there has been a large rise in such behaviour by young women, what we dub "ladettes". The huge rise in recent years of such loutish behaviour - which seems worse and more embarassing when women do it - has been caused by nothing more than feminism. Feminism and the feminazis are to blame for the huge rise in ladette culture. It's nobody else's fault.
Another typical night in England. A bunch of drunks who should be home studying geography.
They would not know how to act any other way.
If you can't take a punch from a random drunk woman you aren't much of a man to begin with. Chivalry? Is that why he'd more than likely be charged for sexual assault if he fought back?