Monogamous or even polygamous homosexual sex presents a far lower risk of spreading HIV than heterosexual promiscuity.
Yer just so ignorantly and stoopidly wrong. Here are stats from 2016.Monogamous or even polygamous homosexual sex presents a far lower risk of spreading HIV than heterosexual promiscuity.
Yer just so ignorantly and stoopidly wrong. Here are stats from 2016.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
It mentions nothing about monogamy vs. promiscuity, only homosexuality vs. heterosexuality. Where are the stats distinguishing between monogamy vs. promiscuity?
You find it, yer the one who posted the statement without verification.
My stats were from the CDC and from two years ago and you had to go back 14 years to find some obscure out of date shit to support yer claim.BBC NEWS | Health | Promiscuity 'fuelling HIV spread'
Do you really need a link to show that a heterosexual promiscuous man poses a greater HIV threat to his sexual partner than a faithful monogamous homosexual man does? The most rudimentary knowledge of biology should have told you that. Lemme guess: your mom kept you out of sex ed class when you were a kid?
Even yer 2016 stats show homosexuals get HIV the most, and most of that through promiscuous behaviour.Monogamous or even polygamous homosexual sex presents a far lower risk of spreading HIV than heterosexual promiscuity.
Kicking the dyke-bitch out of office was a good first step.
Even yer 2016 stats show homosexuals get HIV the most, and most of that through promiscuous behaviour.
Even yer 2016 stats show homosexuals get HIV the most, and most of that through promiscuous behaviour.
84% HIV/AIDS Transmission Cases In 2016 Caused By Promiscuous Sex, What M'sians Must Know
Is 2016 good enough for you? Seriously, if you need a link to explain basic biology...
Could it be if you've seen two or three Pride parades you've seen 'em all?
The Economic Cost of HIV/AIDS in Canada - Canadian AIDS Society
https://www.cdnaids.ca/wp-content/uploads/Economic-Cost-of-HIV-AIDS-in-Canada.pdf
'We estimate the net present value of the economic loss attributed to those recently infected with HIV to be $4,031,500,000, or $1.3 million per person. Omitting quality of life lost for the sake of comparison, the current figures are about 22% higher than those estimated in 2001 after accounting for inflation.'
Do you pay taxes?