Donald Trump Announces 2016 White House Bid

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Donald Trump pardons Rudy Giuliani and others who backed efforts to overturn 2020 election, official says
None of U.S. president's allies named were charged in federal cases over 2020 election

Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Alanna Durkin Richer
Published Nov 10, 2025 • Last updated 12 hours ago • 3 minute read
It looks like Bondi is trying to protect herself, avoid contradicting Trump, and cover for Gabbard at the same time. It’s very irregular for Gabbard, whose job is supposed to focus on foreign intelligence, to be involved in an investigation over supposed 2020 election fraud in Georgia (which was disproven in court long ago). Trump himself is unusually close to the investigation, discussing the Fulton County raid with Gabbard and FBI officials who were present. What is actually going on, and what is the end goal?
Ed Martin, the government’s pardon attorney, posted on social media a signed proclamation of the “full, complete, and unconditional” pardon, which also names Sidney Powell, an attorney who promoted baseless conspiracy theories about a stolen election, and John Eastman, another lawyer who pushed a plan to keep Trump in power. The proclamation, posted online late Sunday, explicitly says the pardon does not apply to Trump.
“DNI Gabbard was down in Atlanta last week for the Fulton County search. Originally, this office said that she was not part of the investigation. She put in a letter to Congress that President Trump directed her to do so, and then now President Trump yesterday said that it was at your insistence that she went down there. So what is the case here?” the reporter asked.
Presidential pardons apply only to federal crimes, and none of the Trump allies named were charged in federal cases over the 2020 election. But the move underscores Trump’s continued efforts to promote the idea that the 2020 election was stolen from him even though courts around the country and U.S. officials found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. It follows the sweeping pardons of the hundreds of Trump supporters charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, including those convicted of attacking law enforcement.
On Thursday, President Trump was asked why Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, was at the raid in which ballots from the 2020 election were seized. He responded by blaming Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying that Gabbard “took a lot of heat ... because she went in at Pam’s insistence ... and she looked at votes.”
Bondi responded that she and Gabbard are “inseparable,” along with others who were at the press conference Friday (which included FBI Director Kash Patel and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro).

“She was down there with Deputy Director Andrew Bailey of the FBI,” Bondi said, referring to Gabbard. “I’m not going to talk about any other details of that matter right now because Georgia is a very important issue to us. She was there, we’re inseparable, that’s all I’ll say.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,834
3,749
113
What’s happening with the FBI seizure of ballots in Georgia?
Trump hasn't commented on the investigation, but the FBI said it was doing its routine work in investigating a possible crime.

Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Amber Phillips, The Washington Post
Published Feb 12, 2026 • 3 minute read

021226-Georgia-Election-Investigation
An FBI employee stands inside the Fulton County Election HUB as the FBI takes Fulton County 2020 Election ballots, Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2026, in Union City, Ga., near Atlanta. Photo by Mike Stewart /AP
The FBI recently seized hundreds of ballots from the Atlanta area; we learned this week the seizure was based on debunked claims about the 2020 election.


What happened in Georgia has alarmed many election experts, who worry it could be part of a push by President Donald Trump to open the door to future federal interference in election results. Days after the ballots were taken, Trump said the federal government should “take over the voting” in certain places.


“It’s all being used to create an impression, potentially a justification for a potential federal election interference,” said David Becker, a former Justice Department voting rights attorney and head of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research.

Trump hasn’t commented on the investigation, but the FBI said it was doing its routine work in investigating a possible crime.

“If these deficiencies were the result of intentional action, it would be a violation of federal law,” FBI Special Agent Hugh Raymond Evans wrote in the bureau’s court request for the search warrant.

Here’s what happened in Georgia and why election officials are watching it so closely.


The FBI is now in possession of hundreds of ballots from Georgia’s 2020 presidential election
The search and seizure happened in late January in Fulton County, which is Georgia’s most populous county – and its most Democratic.

It shocked election experts. “We have never seen the federal government step in and seize voting materials like this, anytime that I can remember,” said Tammy Patrick, a former election official in Arizona now with the nonpartisan Election Center.

This week, a judge made public the affidavit the government used to convince a judge to okay the seizure. As my Washington Post colleagues detail, the affidavits piece together claims made by election conspiracy theorists who were trying to prove nonexistent election fraud in the 2020 presidential election. The affidavit does not offer specific evidence that a crime may have been committed.

It’s worth pointing out that several independent reviews found no evidence for election fraud in Georgia – or anywhere else – that was widespread enough to change the outcome of the election.


“The 2020 election was one of the most transparent, scrutinized events in American history,” Becker said. “We know who won Georgia in 2020 because the paper ballots were counted three times, three different ways.”

No one knows what the FBI is doing with the ballots
The Constitution says states, not the federal government, must conduct elections.

And that means election materials are supposed to stay in state officials’ hands, said Patrick, who oversaw elections in Arizona’s largest county. (“Every once in a while,” she said, “we would get a candidate who can’t believe they lost, and so they’d come in and see the ballots.”)

Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said in a news conference that local officials can “no longer be held responsible” for the seized ballots and other materials the FBI took, such as voter information.

“I don’t know where they are now. I don’t know what they’re doing with them,” he said. “Are they opening the boxes? Are they stuffing other ballots into there? I have no clue.”


Fulton County officials have asked a court to give them the ballots back.

The director of national intelligence was also at the search
Lawmakers and former intelligence officials were stunned to see pictures of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at the search, The Post reports. Gabbard oversees the nation’s spy agencies, not elections.

Gabbard said that Trump requested her attendance and that she was there as part of her authority to “analyze intelligence related to election security.”

One debunked election claim from 2020 was that countries such as Venezuela somehow accessed voting machines and tampered with the votes. (This is baseless, and voting machines are safe, multiple election experts told me.) It’s unclear whether Gabbard was present as part of some inquiry into foreign interference; again, previous investigations have found no evidence U.S. adversaries altered ballots.

Other election officials are watching this
The former election officials I spoke to all stressed that local officials like those in Fulton County are focused on making sure people’s votes are accurately counted. Their nonpartisan work has come under enormous stress and scrutiny since the 2020 election – and as Trump continues to question past results, that pressure has only increased.

“Trump constantly says our elections are rigged,” Becker said. “That’s 100 percent false. Our elections are as secure and transparent as they’ve ever been, by every measure. It’s one of the places you can say government works best.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,834
3,749
113
What’s happening with the FBI seizure of ballots in Georgia?
Trump hasn't commented on the investigation, but the FBI said it was doing its routine work in investigating a possible crime.

Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Amber Phillips, The Washington Post
Published Feb 12, 2026 • 3 minute read

021226-Georgia-Election-Investigation
An FBI employee stands inside the Fulton County Election HUB as the FBI takes Fulton County 2020 Election ballots, Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2026, in Union City, Ga., near Atlanta. Photo by Mike Stewart /AP
The FBI recently seized hundreds of ballots from the Atlanta area; we learned this week the seizure was based on debunked claims about the 2020 election.


What happened in Georgia has alarmed many election experts, who worry it could be part of a push by President Donald Trump to open the door to future federal interference in election results. Days after the ballots were taken, Trump said the federal government should “take over the voting” in certain places.


“It’s all being used to create an impression, potentially a justification for a potential federal election interference,” said David Becker, a former Justice Department voting rights attorney and head of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research.

Trump hasn’t commented on the investigation, but the FBI said it was doing its routine work in investigating a possible crime.

“If these deficiencies were the result of intentional action, it would be a violation of federal law,” FBI Special Agent Hugh Raymond Evans wrote in the bureau’s court request for the search warrant.

Here’s what happened in Georgia and why election officials are watching it so closely.


The FBI is now in possession of hundreds of ballots from Georgia’s 2020 presidential election
The search and seizure happened in late January in Fulton County, which is Georgia’s most populous county – and its most Democratic.

It shocked election experts. “We have never seen the federal government step in and seize voting materials like this, anytime that I can remember,” said Tammy Patrick, a former election official in Arizona now with the nonpartisan Election Center.

This week, a judge made public the affidavit the government used to convince a judge to okay the seizure. As my Washington Post colleagues detail, the affidavits piece together claims made by election conspiracy theorists who were trying to prove nonexistent election fraud in the 2020 presidential election. The affidavit does not offer specific evidence that a crime may have been committed.

It’s worth pointing out that several independent reviews found no evidence for election fraud in Georgia – or anywhere else – that was widespread enough to change the outcome of the election.


“The 2020 election was one of the most transparent, scrutinized events in American history,” Becker said. “We know who won Georgia in 2020 because the paper ballots were counted three times, three different ways.”

No one knows what the FBI is doing with the ballots
The Constitution says states, not the federal government, must conduct elections.

And that means election materials are supposed to stay in state officials’ hands, said Patrick, who oversaw elections in Arizona’s largest county. (“Every once in a while,” she said, “we would get a candidate who can’t believe they lost, and so they’d come in and see the ballots.”)

Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said in a news conference that local officials can “no longer be held responsible” for the seized ballots and other materials the FBI took, such as voter information.

“I don’t know where they are now. I don’t know what they’re doing with them,” he said. “Are they opening the boxes? Are they stuffing other ballots into there? I have no clue.”


Fulton County officials have asked a court to give them the ballots back.

The director of national intelligence was also at the search
Lawmakers and former intelligence officials were stunned to see pictures of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at the search, The Post reports. Gabbard oversees the nation’s spy agencies, not elections.

Gabbard said that Trump requested her attendance and that she was there as part of her authority to “analyze intelligence related to election security.”

One debunked election claim from 2020 was that countries such as Venezuela somehow accessed voting machines and tampered with the votes. (This is baseless, and voting machines are safe, multiple election experts told me.) It’s unclear whether Gabbard was present as part of some inquiry into foreign interference; again, previous investigations have found no evidence U.S. adversaries altered ballots.

Other election officials are watching this
The former election officials I spoke to all stressed that local officials like those in Fulton County are focused on making sure people’s votes are accurately counted. Their nonpartisan work has come under enormous stress and scrutiny since the 2020 election – and as Trump continues to question past results, that pressure has only increased.

“Trump constantly says our elections are rigged,” Becker said. “That’s 100 percent false. Our elections are as secure and transparent as they’ve ever been, by every measure. It’s one of the places you can say government works best.”
i don't trust this investigation or any other.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
"The Republicans should say, 'We want to take over,'" Trump said. "We should take over the voting ... in at least many, 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting. We have states that are so crooked and they're counting votes."
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5719304-trump-democracy-threat-midterms/
“I would say that many people believe that it may be one of the most important things that we need to make sure we trust, is reliable, and that when it gets to Election Day, that we’ve been proactive to make sure that we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country through the days that we have, knowing that people can trust it,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.
(The Constitution gives states the authority to conduct federal elections, subject to laws passed by Congress. The elections clause states, in part, that "state legislatures will establish the times, places, and manner of holding elections for the House of Representatives and the Senate."🤫)
But as part of the same press conference, where Noem pushed for a federal overhaul of state election laws, the DHS secretary went further than her party’s usual talking points.

In case this isn’t obvious, the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for helping protect U.S. election infrastructure from threats, but it has nothing to do with preventing election fraud.

And more to the point, the idea that DHS is taking steps to ensure thatthe right leadersget elected is ridiculous. The incident seemed like the latest in a series of instances in which leading GOP officials said the quiet part loud: The secretary wants to use the levers of federal power to ensure those she sees as “the right leaders” prevail in future elections, which is a power she isn’t supposed to have.
1771252690954.jpegAt a local press conference, Noem, the South Dakota Republican insisted that Arizona “is an absolute disaster” when it comes to elections, but when asked by a reporter whether she was aware of any examples of voter fraud actually happening in the state, the secretary pointed to literally nothing. It’s likely that the Department of Homeland Security will pitch the most benign explanation possible for the unscripted comments. But given the broader context, and the Republican administration’s unsubtle campaign targeting elections, it’s tough to give Noem the benefit of the doubt.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,922
8,337
113
B.C.
“I would say that many people believe that it may be one of the most important things that we need to make sure we trust, is reliable, and that when it gets to Election Day, that we’ve been proactive to make sure that we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country through the days that we have, knowing that people can trust it,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.

But as part of the same press conference, where Noem pushed for a federal overhaul of state election laws, the DHS secretary went further than her party’s usual talking points.

In case this isn’t obvious, the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for helping protect U.S. election infrastructure from threats, but it has nothing to do with preventing election fraud.

And more to the point, the idea that DHS is taking steps to ensure thatthe right leadersget elected is ridiculous. The incident seemed like the latest in a series of instances in which leading GOP officials said the quiet part loud: The secretary wants to use the levers of federal power to ensure those she sees as “the right leaders” prevail in future elections, which is a power she isn’t supposed to have.
View attachment 33282At a local press conference, Noem, the South Dakota Republican insisted that Arizona “is an absolute disaster” when it comes to elections, but when asked by a reporter whether she was aware of any examples of voter fraud actually happening in the state, the secretary pointed to literally nothing. It’s likely that the Department of Homeland Security will pitch the most benign explanation possible for the unscripted comments. But given the broader context, and the Republican administration’s unsubtle campaign targeting elections, it’s tough to give Noem the benefit of the doubt.
Yup 2020 was the most secure election ever . And certainly no shenanigans in 2024 .