i'm more interested in future life progression hypnosis. who i'm going to be. hopefully very rich.

Unless one is born into a primitive tribe and remains isolated from the rest of the world, everyone has lived before, according to those who investigate reincarnation. There is only one who has supposedly managed to achieve the ultimate goal with one incarnation, and that was the being known as Jesus. He alone, so far as I am aware of, remembered his origin and his life's purpose for the time and place. Better than most of us have managed. He set the standards for his time and place.
Young children are the closest to their origin and tend to remember things that seem impossible to their parents.
The supposition, is that we set our goals for our lifetimes, and attempt to reach them. However, there are miscalculations, accidental happenings and unforeseen events that repeatedly derail our lives. The ultimate goal, of course is reintegration with (not sure how to put this, as I am not particularly religious) into the aware force, entity that constitutes all of existence. The force/energy from which we originated. Since we are merely a speck of all existence, I see me as first a portion of a sentient universe, but also the means by which, that original sentient Force or Entity evolves.
That may be so, but how many times have you used your intuition in a situation where it was impossible to consult science and it's skepticism?? In my experience, this is how we mostly live our lives, not by consulting those pundits who are scientifically and skeptically inclined. How many times has your intuition (or your unconscious knowledge & experience) failed you?? Bet not as often as those financial,or political experts have. Science is all about having all the available information and for reincarnation it (science) has refused to acknowledge it. Pretty hard to investigate something they refuse to acknowledge may exist,wouldn't you agree?
Of course, human perception is faulty, for goodness sake, our sight, hearing and even time itself is not as it seems. But, I will trust my gut, intuition or that sudden "knowing" inspite of all those scientifics evaluations to the contrary. It is exceedingly easy to dismiss what is not seen, or experienced or possible to detect by our modern machines. That does not mean they do not exist, just that we have not found the means of revealing them.
We are all just replicating DNA. There is nothing lost or gained. There is a finite amount of energy. Perhaps when we decompose and our DNa is absorbed into another life form, we carry a cellular memory of a former existence. What I always found funny was how many people who claimed to be Cleopatra or Caesar in a past life. The chances are that we do carry some of their genes and that is where the memory comes from.I believe in reincarnation, so, yes, I believe in past lives. I also believe a higher power is putting us through this, so we can learn something. That said, as I get older, I wonder what the meaning of life is all about. I mean, if you're a spider, the best you can hope for is that something else doesn't eat you, while you go around eating insects - what's the point of that? Same for humans, in a larger sense, I guess. So I don't know why we live.
We are all just replicating DNA. There is nothing lost or gained. There is a finite amount of energy. Perhaps when we decompose and our DNa is absorbed into another life form, we carry a cellular memory of a former existence. What I always found funny was how many people who claimed to be Cleopatra or Caesar in a past life. The chances are that we do carry some of their genes and that is where the memory comes from.
Or, we are just a bunch of lunatics trying to justify what is a pointless existence.
I'd say that's close to the right answer, and that looking to things like telepathy, past and future lives, and all the other unsubstantiated mysticism that's appeared in this thread, is the wrong place to look for meaning. We have to create our own meaning, find a point for our existence ourselves, it won't come from anywhere outside us.Or, we are just a bunch of lunatics trying to justify what is a pointless existence.
Names, dates, places, references, links...? You can't keep making such extraordinary claims and expect people to just take your word for it.
Good luck on that. Even when one is very rich, it does not guarantee satisfying life.i'm more interested in future life progression hypnosis. who i'm going to be. hopefully very rich.![]()
![]()
I'd say that's close to the right answer, and that looking to things like telepathy, past and future lives, and all the other unsubstantiated mysticism that's appeared in this thread, is the wrong place to look for meaning. We have to create our own meaning, find a point for our existence ourselves, it won't come from anywhere outside us.
Actually, Jesus has lived on Earth several times, and if you learn to understand telepathy, you may check it with him yourself. I have. My first record of him panned out as Joshua, leader of the Jews, approx. a thousand years later he lived as Jesus, approx. nine hundred years later he lived as St. Francis of Assisi, and at the end of the 20th century he lived again for seven years in Croatia, until he was stabbed to death by a Catholic priest who sexually abused him.
We all come back to Earth approx. thousand years apart, could be as a man or a woman for the duration. For example, the woman known as Mary mother of Jesus has been Joshua's father Nun, then of course as Mary mother of Jesus, then she lived again as a freed slave, a soldier who made it good in Egypt during the Fatamid empire, next she lived a short life as an Arab woman in the early 20th century, and was reborn 30 years later in Europe as a Christian woman.
Everyone has a story, and each and every one of us are born with the perception of being the exact center of the universe.
We are all just replicating DNA. There is nothing lost or gained. There is a finite amount of energy. Perhaps when we decompose and our DNa is absorbed into another life form, we carry a cellular memory of a former existence. What I always found funny was how many people who claimed to be Cleopatra or Caesar in a past life. The chances are that we do carry some of their genes and that is where the memory comes from.
Or, we are just a bunch of lunatics trying to justify what is a pointless existence.
And the first thing I see is that there's a dispute about the neutrality of that article. But so what? Tales aren't evidence, doesn't matter how many of them there are, they're just tales. The history of any culture is bulging with myths and legends, just dip into the Bible a bit and you'll find the major ones for this culture. People make things up all the time, and that particular tale is from a culture with a pre-existing belief in reincarnation, which is reason enough in itself to doubt the neutrality of the investigation. I'll say it again, no such case that's been subjected to proper investigation has survived skeptical scrutiny, there's always a more prosaic explanation, as there was in the case of Bridey Murphy.Look up Shanti Devi. There is a short summary in Wickipedia. It is only one of thousands of tales.
When we are reincarnated does our D.N.A. go with us?
And the first thing I see is that there's a dispute about the neutrality of that article. But so what? Tales aren't evidence, doesn't matter how many of them there are, they're just tales. The history of any culture is bulging with myths and legends, just dip into the Bible a bit and you'll find the major ones for this culture. People make things up all the time, and that particular tale is from a culture with a pre-existing belief in reincarnation, which is reason enough in itself to doubt the neutrality of the investigation. I'll say it again, no such case that's been subjected to proper investigation has survived skeptical scrutiny, there's always a more prosaic explanation, as there was in the case of Bridey Murphy.
Carl Sagan conceded in his book, The Demon Haunted World, that such tales of reincarnation are one of the things in parapsychology that deserve serious investigation, and I'm inclined to agree, but it's not been widely done, and the people who generally do such investigations are credulous parapsychologists like Dr. Ian Stevenson, who seem not to know, or to have forgotten, the rules for conducting proper investigations. The evidence for reincarnation just isn't there, and until it is, I'll maintain the default position of doubting all such claims.
Are you familiar with the work of Jane Roberts? If not you would probably enjoy it very much. Her book "The Nature of Persoanl Reality" is, to me, the diffinitive word on the subject. And she wrote this stuff before the metaphysical and parapsychology craze came into fashion. Much of what I have seen since I read her work has been a less elegant rehash of what she said.It really doesn't make a great difference to my life if I change anyone's opinion. I have been given a freedom to express what I perceive. Will it result in fabulous potential for humans......highly unlikely. We are all on the same road, just travelling different paths to get there.
Are you familiar with the work of Jane Roberts? If not you would probably enjoy it very much. Her book "The Nature of Persoanl Reality" is, to me, the diffinitive word on the subject. And she wrote this stuff before the metaphysical and parapsychology craze came into fashion. Much of what I have seen since I read her work has been a less elegant rehash of what she said.