I keep trying to tell you, that is NOT a legitimate conclusion from quantum physics, that's the New Age mystic's take on it and it has no grounding in reality. Quantum physics is fully consistent with an objective reality that exists regardless of anyone's or any thing's perceptions of it.
Einstein was a mystic. Where else did he get his math from except through navel gazing. And Dex has a very narrow view of reality. Besides, I only pose questions. I don't draw conclusions.
Unless you know the math, and I'm pretty sure you don't, you can't have any idea where it comes from. Special Relativity requires nothing more complex than high school algebra and geometry, which I concede you might understand, I really have no idea about that. The math for General Relativity, which I'm sure you don't know, is essentially the non-Euclidean geometry developed by creative mathematicians like Reimann and Lobachevsky. The math for quantum theory is mostly advanced partial differential equations and probability and a particular form of calculating energy relationships called the Lagrangian, and I'm sure you don't know that either. No navel gazing or mysticism required. I suppose if you consider insisting on good evidence for any claims about the nature of reality to be a narrow view, I guess I'm guilty on that one, but untestable claims aren't worth anything if you're interested in what's true and what we can find out about it. I'm completely confident that my view of reality is more accurate and complete than yours. And it's not true that you don't draw conclusions, you continue to state quite clearly the conclusion that we create our own reality. Which is not an accurate view, there is nothing anywhere in science that would justify such a conclusion.
I say narrow because you will not consider anything outside scientific theory. Life, for me, is experiential and multi-dimensional. There is far more to reality than can be experienced with the five physical senses. The downfall of this civilization will be its fixation on measuring and quantifying everything. Science has negated spirituality at its own peril. I see science as a knee jerk reaction to religion, an opposite side of the same coin. It would take too long to explain where I have been and what I have learned through experiences outside the realm of science and the five physical senses.
Nope, science deals with that which can be measured and counted. Religion is somebody who would prefer to make his money lying to people to working.
Only someone who understands very little about science and religion and their histories could say such a thing, that's a very shallow view. Science is full of spirituality; what do you suppose motivates the people who practice it if it's not the pleasure, the awe and wonder, of finding things out?
Each time I think you have reached the lowest level of intelligence you start to dig.
Where did you get all that information, and how is it that you know this stuff and nobody else does? I venture to suggest you just made it all up on the basis of no evidence at all.
There are hundreds of books that say similar things about origins and destination concerning before and afterlife. Most of it is "channeled works". It is like any other belief system, open to interpretation, acceptance or rejection. It all depends on what a person is willing to believe. Like most people who believe, it really doesn't matter that someone else does or not. Everyone has their life lessons to learn. How they get there is up to them. It is their journey and nobody can tell them how to make it.
What did you possibly gain by that comment?
What books have you read on the subject that you could refer us to?
