Exactly.
Of course the local court would decide based on practicality, not the lawyer based on strategy.
Exactly.
How would they decide if they don't understand each other?
Define local?
Will reading up on the history of free trade, read up on the history of Europe and it's tiny little States each with their own languages or dialect. How well did that work out for them?
How many Europes fit into Canada?
Can a Welshman understand a Celtic?
Predominantly French-speaking country or not, most businesses would recognize the local market. Why should government not be run like a business in that respect?
And what do you mean about French being 'dangerous'? What, it allows them to avoid speeding tickets?
Actually, the idea presented in th eOP would sudeenly make it more difficult to escape speeding tickets on the basis of language since then the onus would be on the person to know the dominant local language.
And so this would allos for smaller government by no longer requiring as many translation and interpretation services. Making English compulsory nationwide would merely create a large Federal translation and interpretation bureaucracy in Quebec.
Sounds like Taxslave likes to be a slave to taxes.
Canada = 33 millionPopulation-wise, about 5 Canadas can fit into the UK alone!
Can a Welshman understand a Celtic?
I'd pay money to hear a Newf say "Hey buddy! Haben sie noch extra cod?"Canada = 33 million
UK = 62 million
Meaning less than 2.0 times Canada's population can fit in the UK
The Welsh language *IS* Celtic as opposed to English which is West-Germanic.
Not at all. The federal government or indeed any government should not have to pay for translation services. That would be up to the person that can't speak english to pay for. That is why one official language, to cut waste in government.
What will it take to end this nonsense and declare english as ontario,s official language?