Nope. He said that IF RCS proved otherwise THEN he would apologize.
If my wife goes shopping, I will go with her. Only in CB's goofy mind is that statement a demand for my wife to go shopping.
Do The Conservatives Deserve Another Chance?
- Thread starter Liberalman
- Start date
Nope. He said that IF RCS proved otherwise THEN he would apologize.
If my wife goes shopping, I will go with her. Only in CB's goofy mind is that statement a demand for my wife to go shopping.
Yep you and Joey here, are cut from the same cloth.
My opinion of Harper, is based on tangible fact, and I can cite each individual act.
That's the difference between you, me and Joey here. I deal in evidence, you two deal in imagination.
Only if you and Joey keep posting.
And you do not see the difference between 'demand' and 'want'?
Noted.
Have a nice day.
There's no "if" in his statement.
Making that ridiculous comparison, well, ridiculous.
Troll on clown prince.
You didn't ask, you simply said "Provide". Making it a demand.
I doubt it.
Keep posting.
Well...then if you have access to all these facts...
...then can you please show me unbiased, factual proof that PM Harper is not 'a power hungry, emotionally unbalanced person who cares far more about staying in power then he does in making Canada a better country'
Once again...
Demand definition
'request urgently and forcefully'
define:demand - Google Search
Where was my request 'urgent' or forceful'?
And I meant it in the context of a statement that IF he provides me with the information THEN I will apologize.
Cannuck has it dead right.
That's your position to either prove or leave as an example of your highly charged ideological imagination.
My position has already been stated. I think he's a pandering politician, that hasn't lived up to his promises. But I deal in reality, not imagination. So I don't need to use an ideological imagination to make up stuff about him.
After looking at a new piece of machinery in the mill that had just been built and installed one man turned to me with words of wisdom when he said "Before you can become an engineer the first lesson is to loose all common sense"
Well "Before you can become a politician, you have to loose all Integrity"
Well "Before you can become a politician, you have to loose all Integrity"
Tone is everything.
I'm sure you want me to believe that now.
I'm sure you believe that. I'll stay tuned for when he isn't your cuddly buddy and he's doing the same thing I am to you, in the future. Only worse, he just makes stuff up about you as he goes along.
I can't wait to say, "I told you so"...
Definitions of tone on the Web:
the quality of a person's voice; "he began in a conversational tone"; "he spoke in a nervous tone of voice"
(linguistics) a pitch or change in pitch of the voice that serves to distinguish words in tonal languages; "the Beijing dialect uses four tones"
define:tone - Google Search
Tone? On an online chat forum?
Uhhhh.....yeaaaah.
Have a nice day.
In other words...you cannot.
And I cannot prove my belief is correct either.
Are we done yet?
I take it you don't read books eh?
An author can set a tone in script. But hey, you and Joey are good buddies, I'm sure you two can come up with some other goal post, or twist of word, to keep the stupidity flowing.
No ... but you can gauge how close to the mark you were by the sandbag toss after the fact ;-)
I can prove my position, it is you that is having great difficulty proving yours.
That's all you had to say, thanx for conceding, you just passed Joey on the maturity scale.
Now that you admitted you can't prove your opinion, yes.
Have a nice day.
hmmm...
McRocket
I can get on here and say Count Ignatieff is an opportunist, an import, a narcissist, a man who only came home to claim the promised crown, a power hungry, ivory-tower intellectual with the common sense of a starling, and the ethics of an alley cat.
The difference is I'd be correct on all Counts.... (pun intended, lol)
But it all adds exactly NOTHING to the debate.
McRocket
I can get on here and say Count Ignatieff is an opportunist, an import, a narcissist, a man who only came home to claim the promised crown, a power hungry, ivory-tower intellectual with the common sense of a starling, and the ethics of an alley cat.
The difference is I'd be correct on all Counts.... (pun intended, lol)
But it all adds exactly NOTHING to the debate.
Of course there is. While he didn't actually type the word "if", anyone with an ounce of common sense can see that it is an if/then statement. Of course, it's clear that you have been confused by this so obviously the polite thing to do (as well as the smart thing) would be to ask for clarification to help clear up this confusion.
So, for clarity sake let's ask the original poster if his statement was intended as a demand or an if/then statement.....oH...wait...I think that's already been answered. OK then...moving on...
If my wife goes shopping, I will go with her. Only in CB's goofy mind is that statement a demand for my wife to go shopping.
Where did I say I could? I did not.
I still believe what I believe about the man.
But I cannot factually prove it. How could anyone factually prove what a man is inside - especially when they do not know him?
Nor can you that my belief is wrong.
That is why I said it was my 'belief'.
SHEESH....I assumed ALL OF THAT would have been obvious.
I guess the old saying 'never assume' has merit.
Well that excludes you, so who told you that?
What would you know about commonsense and politeness?
You can't.
And there's the proof, oh clown prince Joey.
I guess we aren't done yet...
You said it was ut there in his statements and public appearances.
I'm sure you do, even though there is no substance to support it.
Then how can you believe it?
How do you prove someones imagination wrong?
I get that.
Quite.
Nor I.Maybe not to you....