deaths

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Two men convicted of cutting down beloved Sycamore Gap tree in 2023
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Brian Melley
Published May 09, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 5 minute read

042925-Britain-Sycamore-Gap
Forensic investigators from Northumbria Police examining the felled Sycamore Gap tree, on Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland, England, Sept. 29, 2023.
LONDON (AP) — In late September 2023, as the first big storm of the fall was kicking up in the U.K., a malicious plan was hatched to take down one of England’s favourite trees.


Daniel Graham sent a message to his buddy, Adam Carruthers, telling him to “get the saws warmed up,” suggesting they might get some work clearing fallen trees.

But it wasn’t high winds that brought down the famous Sycamore Gap tree that night, jurors determined Friday. It was Graham and Carruthers — not cleaning up damage from the storm, but creating a mess of their own.

The pair were convicted of two counts each of criminal damage by a jury in Newcastle Crown Court after little more than five hours of deliberations over two days.

Even without the smoking chainsaw, prosecutors were able to prove the case through a trove of digital evidence that either put the men near the tree at the time it was felled or showed them excitedly discussing it the next day as the story of the tree’s demise went viral.

Crime caught in the act
The prime piece of evidence was a grainy video on Graham’s phone of the crime being committed on the dark and stormy night.


Footage of the tree’s last stand showed a solitary figure silhouetted beneath the towering canopy in a struggle with the trunk as the unmistakable sound of the chainsaw whined above the wind. With a single crack, the buzz of the saw died down, the person stepped back and the tree that had stood about 150 years crashed to earth.

Metadata pinpointed the location of the video at the tree’s location in Northumberland National Park. Other data showed Graham’s Range Rover had traveled there.

The Sycamore Gap tree was not Britain’s biggest or oldest sycamore, but it was prized for its picturesque setting, symmetrically planted between two hills along the ancient wall built by Emperor Hadrian in A.D. 122 to protect the northwest frontier of the Roman Empire, and had attracted generations of followers.

The tree had long been known to locals but received international attention in Kevin Costner’s 1991 film “Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves.” It drew tourists, lovers, landscape photographers and even those who spread the ashes of loved ones.


“For over a century, Sycamore Gap has been an iconic natural landmark in the northeast of England, bringing immeasurable joy to those visiting the area,” Gale Gilchrist, chief prosecutor for the region, said in a statement after the verdict. “In just under three minutes, Graham and Carruthers ended its historic legacy in a deliberate and mindless act of destruction.”

Convicts could face ‘lengthy’ sentences
Neither Graham, who had a small construction business, nor Carruthers, a mechanic who sometimes worked with him, showed any visible reaction as the verdicts were read.

Justice Christina Lambert ordered both men held in custody until sentencing on July 15 and said they could face “a lengthy period in custody.” The maximum sentence for criminal damage is 10 years in prison.

The defendants, once close friends, both testified that they were at their respective homes that night and had nothing to do with the crime.


Graham pointed the finger at Carruthers, saying he was obsessed with the tree. Graham said his friend and another man had taken his Range Rover and phone to the site to frame him.

Carruthers said he didn’t understand why people were so upset about “just a tree,” saying it was “almost as if someone had been murdered.” His lawyer suggested Graham told a desperate lie after being caught.

Prosecutor Richard Wright said the two men were in on it together from the start, with evidence showing Carruthers had gone far out of his way earlier in the day to go near the tree on a reconnaissance mission.

Wright said he couldn’t say who cut the tree and who held the phone, but the two men were the only people in the world with the video on their devices.

As Graham’s vehicle was tracked on its way back toward his home in Carlisle — about 40 minutes away — Carruthers received a video from his partner of their infant and replied, “I’ve got a better video than that,” Wright said.


“At the time of that text conversation, the only people in the world who knew the tree had been felled were the men who had had cut it down,” Wright said. “And the only people in the world who had access to the video were the men who had filmed themselves in the act of cutting down the tree: the defendants Graham and Carruthers.”

Missing: one chainsaw and a ‘trophy’ wedge of wood
The next day, the two feverishly exchanged messages after the tree was discovered.

“It’s gone viral. It is worldwide,” Graham said.

Carruthers forwarded a Facebook comment by a man who criticized the “disgusting behaviour” of the “weak” vandals.

Carruthers said he’d like to see the man “launch an operation like we did last night.”

Wright said police never located the chainsaw used to fell the tree, but each man had access to plenty of saws — a fact they both tried to downplay. Investigators also couldn’t find a wedge of wood cut from the trunk to drop the tree in the right direction.


But images on Graham’s phone showed a slice of wood and a chainsaw in the back of his vehicle at his home. A forensic botanist said there was “very strong evidence” it was the missing wedge that Wright suggested had been taken as a trophy.

Prosecutors offered no evidence of a motive for the crime other than calling it senseless vandalism. But Wright suggested to jurors in his closing argument that the men cut the tree down for “a bit of a laugh” but had failed to realize the anger they would spark in the “arboreal equivalent of mindless thuggery.”

The tree was originally valued at more than 620,000 pounds (around $830,000) and damage to the wall was estimated at 1,100 pounds (nearly $1,500).

But on Friday prosecutor Rebecca Brown said those figures are in dispute and are likely lower, but would still easily fit in the top category of harm for sentencing purposes.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Family of senior killed by man falling from Leaside Bridge sues city
The $1.7M lawsuit claims the City of Toronto was negligent for not installing a suicide barrier as was done on the Bloor Viaduct

Author of the article:Chris Doucette
Published May 10, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

The family of a senior citizen killed after a pedestrian fell from the Leaside Bridge and landed on a vehicle he was travelling in on the DVP nearly a year ago is suing the City of Toronto.


The $1.7-million lawsuit, filed last week, reportedly accuses the city of negligence for not installing a suicide barrier along the bridge on Millwood Rd.

CTV News Toronto reports a statement of claim filed Tuesday alleges Harold Lusthouse, 76, of Thornhill, was a passenger in the vehicle driving north on the Don Valley Pkwy. – heading to a brunch for Father’s Day – when a man walking on the bridge overhead “jumped or fell to his death” just before noon on June 16, 2024.

The man landed on the vehicle “violently crushing” Lusthouse and causing him to suffer “catastrophic” injuries, according to the statement of claim.

Lusthouse died in hospital two days later – four days before he would have celebrated his 77th birthday.


The lawsuit – which lists Lusthouse’s daughter Tali Uditsky, son Landon, and grandchildren as plaintiffs – claims damages for the emotional and financial impact of Lusthouse’s death, including the cost of his funeral and counselling for his family.


And it alleges the city should have “known the risks” of failing to install a barrier on the bridge.

“The Defendant, City of Toronto knew or ought to have known, since at least 2003 (if not earlier), that the Leaside Bridge was a common site for falls and/or suicide attempts which it knew or ought to have known rendered the Leaside Bridge unsafe for pedestrians and/or vehicular traffic travelling on the Don Valley Parkway without reasonable safety measures in place,” the statement of claim reportedly alleges.


Toronto Police have yet to say if the man jumped or fell to his death, but the incident was not treated as a criminal matter.

A spokesperson for the city has reportedly told CTV News Toronto it has received the lawsuit and will respond in “due course.”

But the city offered no further comment as the matter is now before the court.


The Leaside Bridge is about 6.5 km north of the Bloor Viaduct, where a suicide barrier was installed in 2003. The barrier drastically reduced the number of suicides from the Bloor Viaduct, which previously had a death toll that was second only to San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge in North America.


A 2017 study found only one suicide death had occurred from the Bloor Viaduct in the 11 years after the barrier was installed. An average of nine people per year reportedly plunged to their death in the 11 years prior to the barrier’s installation.

CBC reports police figures show there were 17 suicides or attempted suicides from the Leaside Bridge in 2023, nine in 2024 and none in 2025 as of April 28.



Speaking about her dad’s death at Toronto’s Infrastructure and Environment Committee on April 9, a grief-stricken Uditsky reportedly asked, “How could this happen?”

“How could drivers and passengers travelling 100 km/h on the Don Valley Parkway – a busy highway – be exposed to this kind of danger?” she wondered.

“My loving dad, who deserved so many more years of life, he was the picture of health,” Uditsky said. “He was stolen from us, taken away as a result of the failure of the city to protect its citizens.”

“This could have happened to anyone,” she pointed out.


City Council ultimately voted in favour of implementing “immediate safety measures” on the Leaside Bridge.

A report on plans for a more permanent design is expected to be delivered at an Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting on Sept. 26.

cdoucette@postmedia.com

@sundoucette
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Family of senior killed by man falling from Leaside Bridge sues city
The $1.7M lawsuit claims the City of Toronto was negligent for not installing a suicide barrier as was done on the Bloor Viaduct

Author of the article:Chris Doucette
Published May 10, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

The family of a senior citizen killed after a pedestrian fell from the Leaside Bridge and landed on a vehicle he was travelling in on the DVP nearly a year ago is suing the City of Toronto.


The $1.7-million lawsuit, filed last week, reportedly accuses the city of negligence for not installing a suicide barrier along the bridge on Millwood Rd.

CTV News Toronto reports a statement of claim filed Tuesday alleges Harold Lusthouse, 76, of Thornhill, was a passenger in the vehicle driving north on the Don Valley Pkwy. – heading to a brunch for Father’s Day – when a man walking on the bridge overhead “jumped or fell to his death” just before noon on June 16, 2024.

The man landed on the vehicle “violently crushing” Lusthouse and causing him to suffer “catastrophic” injuries, according to the statement of claim.

Lusthouse died in hospital two days later – four days before he would have celebrated his 77th birthday.


The lawsuit – which lists Lusthouse’s daughter Tali Uditsky, son Landon, and grandchildren as plaintiffs – claims damages for the emotional and financial impact of Lusthouse’s death, including the cost of his funeral and counselling for his family.


And it alleges the city should have “known the risks” of failing to install a barrier on the bridge.

“The Defendant, City of Toronto knew or ought to have known, since at least 2003 (if not earlier), that the Leaside Bridge was a common site for falls and/or suicide attempts which it knew or ought to have known rendered the Leaside Bridge unsafe for pedestrians and/or vehicular traffic travelling on the Don Valley Parkway without reasonable safety measures in place,” the statement of claim reportedly alleges.


Toronto Police have yet to say if the man jumped or fell to his death, but the incident was not treated as a criminal matter.

A spokesperson for the city has reportedly told CTV News Toronto it has received the lawsuit and will respond in “due course.”

But the city offered no further comment as the matter is now before the court.


The Leaside Bridge is about 6.5 km north of the Bloor Viaduct, where a suicide barrier was installed in 2003. The barrier drastically reduced the number of suicides from the Bloor Viaduct, which previously had a death toll that was second only to San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge in North America.


A 2017 study found only one suicide death had occurred from the Bloor Viaduct in the 11 years after the barrier was installed. An average of nine people per year reportedly plunged to their death in the 11 years prior to the barrier’s installation.

CBC reports police figures show there were 17 suicides or attempted suicides from the Leaside Bridge in 2023, nine in 2024 and none in 2025 as of April 28.



Speaking about her dad’s death at Toronto’s Infrastructure and Environment Committee on April 9, a grief-stricken Uditsky reportedly asked, “How could this happen?”

“How could drivers and passengers travelling 100 km/h on the Don Valley Parkway – a busy highway – be exposed to this kind of danger?” she wondered.

“My loving dad, who deserved so many more years of life, he was the picture of health,” Uditsky said. “He was stolen from us, taken away as a result of the failure of the city to protect its citizens.”

“This could have happened to anyone,” she pointed out.


City Council ultimately voted in favour of implementing “immediate safety measures” on the Leaside Bridge.

A report on plans for a more permanent design is expected to be delivered at an Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting on Sept. 26.

cdoucette@postmedia.com

@sundoucette
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Quebec coroner calls for tougher controls over diphenhydramine sales after 2023 death
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Sidhartha Banerjee
Published May 10, 2025 • 2 minute read

MONTREAL — A Quebec coroner is recommending that diphenhydramine — an antihistamine and sedative sometimes used to sleep better — should be better managed in pharmacies after the overdose death of an 18-year-old man south of Montreal in December 2023.


The young man, whose identity is not revealed in the report made public, died of acute diphenhydramine poisoning at his home in St-Mathias-sur-Richelieu.

On the morning of Dec. 11, 2023, the man was found by his mother in his bed, unconscious and laying on his back. Toxicological analysis found the man had a lethal level of diphenhydramine in his blood.

The drug is the sedating ingredient in some over-the-counter antihistamines including the brand Benadryl, among others.

The coroner found the circumstances surrounding the death raise questions about the uncontrolled availability of a potentially lethal over-the-counter substance. He noted there is consensus about the risks of poisoning among scientific bodies, but it’s not stored behind the counter.

“I cannot understand why the sale of diphenhydramine … is not better controlled,” coroner Vincent Denault wrote. “I can’t understand why diphenhydramine is available over the counter, especially since Gravol, which also contains diphenhydramine, isn’t available.”


In a report dated from late April but released this week, the coroner wrote the man’s death is attributed to the acute toxicity of diphenhydramine, a central nervous system depressant which if consumed in sufficient quantities causes fatal respiratory depression and irregular heartbeat, which can lead to fatal cardiac arrhythmias.

The coroner noted there were previously used empty jars and blister packs of diphenhydramine tablets in the man’s bedroom.

“Was he taking them to sleep better? Could he have taken pills in the same way, but in larger quantities, during the night of December 10-11, 2023?” the coroner asked.

Denault noted it wasn’t the first time deaths have occurred due to the drug. The coroner has already weighed in on three previous Quebec investigations.

There was an uptick around in 2020 after the so-called Benadryl TikTok challenge on social media invited users to consume large quantities of medication tablets containing diphenhydramine.


“The deaths of children have put a face to this dangerous trend,” Denault wrote. “The scientific literature confirms that diphenhydramine is consumed in high doses for its euphoric and hallucinogenic effects, and that people have used it to commit suicide.”

Denault’s recommendation was for the provincial office of professions to take steps to amend regulations involving the sale of medicinal products, to classify diphenhydramine intended for oral administration in a section that requires more management by pharmacists.

That management would include creating a file, noting the sale and carrying out a pharmacological study of the file.

Denault also asked the coroner’s office to share the report with the College des medecins du Quebec — the province’s College of Physicians — and the Ordre des pharmaciens du Quebec, the body that oversees pharmacists in the province.

Jean-Francois Desgagne, president of the pharmacists’ order, said this week the order would review the coroner’s recommendation to reclassify the drug to assess the appropriateness of moving it behind the pharmacist’s counter.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Federal judge says cull of 400 ostriches at B.C. farm hit by avian flu can proceed
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Darryl Greer, Chuck Chiang and Wolf Depner
Published May 13, 2025 • Last updated 11 hours ago • 4 minute read

A Federal Court judge has denied a bid to prevent the Canadian Food Inspection Agency from culling 400 ostriches on a British Columbia farm that was hit by an avian flu outbreak.


The court on Tuesday rejected two judicial reviews that were filed by Universal Ostrich Farms after the agency ordered the flock killed in December, then denied a bid for an exemption in January.

Katie Pasitney’s parents own the farm and she said after the ruling was released that they plan “to fight this legally as far as we can go.”

She said they were inviting supporters to come to the farm in Edgewood in southeastern B.C. and show “kindness, peacefulness and love” in protest of the cull, adding the Canadian Food Inspection Agency had the “full authority … to come in whenever they want.”

Pasitney said the agency had given no indication when culling might begin.

“They’re not gonna make it a public topic because they don’t want everybody to know. We have thousands of people behind us,” she said.


The Canadian Food Inspection Agency did not immediately provide comment on the court ruling Tuesday.

The plight of the ostrich farm has spurred street protests and a social-media campaign to “Save Our Ostriches,” with activists decrying government overreach with the agency’s decision to kill the birds.

The farm got an injunction to delay the cull pending its court case, but Federal Court Justice Russel Zinn ruled Tuesday that the agency’s decisions were both reasonable and procedurally fair, while acknowledging the “real and negative impact” on the farm and its owners.

“Beyond the economic loss, the destruction of a long-established ostrich population is also a source of emotional distress, particularly given the decades of work and investment the principals have dedicated to breeding and raising their flock,“ Zinn wrote. ”I have considerable sympathy for them.”


The family that owns Universal Ostrich Farm has said the birds should be saved because they have developed herd immunity to avian flu and could contribute to the fight against the disease, which has resulted in millions of birds being culled in British Columbia and is the subject of worldwide concern about its potential to result in a human pandemic.

Zinn’s ruling said “courts generally stay out of scientific debates,” and could only rule on the reasonableness and fairness of the decisions.

“Courts must also respect the demonstrated scientific and technical expertise of administrative agencies,” the judgment says. “When Parliament leaves technical or scientific assessments to specialized administrative bodies, it signals that those bodies, not the courts, are best positioned to make judgments on complex, expertise-driven matters.”


The owners of the farm said ostriches that survived the flu have recovered and are happy and healthy.

But Zinn found the disposal notice and denial of the farm’s exemption happened in December 2024 and January 2025, and the court can’t consider evidence that wasn’t available when those decisions were made.

He said the court “would be faulting decision-makers for lacking a crystal ball.”

“This court cannot consider ’new’ evidence, such as the current health status of the ostriches, recent test results or updated scientific developments,” the ruling says.

Zinn said the farm and the agency’s competing scientific submissions invited the court to referee “a contest over whose science on the virus in question is ’better’ and therefore whose preferred animal and public health policy is ’wiser.”’


Zinn said the court couldn’t decide such a contest because it would put the decision beyond the scope of a judicial review focused on determining reasonableness, and “effectively make this court an academy of science and an arbiter of truth in immunology and animal and public health.”

The competing expert reports submitted in the case, Zinn ruled, had no weight on his findings.

Parliament empowered the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to face public-health threats such as avian flu, Zinn said, authorizing it to “act decisively making swift decisions with far-reaching consequences, often under conditions of scientific uncertainty. This is a challenging mandate.”

The court ruling notes that the agency’s “mandate is protective rather than punitive,” and provides compensation to owners whose animals are destroyed, up to $3,000 per animal in the case of ostriches.


More than 8.7 million birds have been culled in B.C. at hundreds of farms, most of them commercial, since the first outbreak of a highly contagious form of the avian flu occurred in the spring of 2022.

Peace River North legislator Jordan Kealy, who supported the attempt to halt the cull, said he was “devastated” by the decision, and the farm was “completely different” to a normal poultry farm that could quickly restock.

“My heart goes out to the family and if people want to reach out to the CFIA and let them know, I honestly believe that there could have been an alternative to this scenario rather than culling and killing all the birds, because they’re 30-year-old animals that are not just easily replaced,” he said.

B.C. Agriculture and Food Minister Lana Popham said in a statement that while the government’s thoughts were with the owners of Universal Ostrich Farms “in what is a very difficult time for them, we respect the decision of the courts, as well as the jurisdiction of the CFIA.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Caught on camera, capuchin monkeys kidnap howler monkey babies
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Christina Larson
Published May 19, 2025 • 2 minute read

a baby howler monkey clinging onto a young adult male capuchin monkey
This photo provided by researchers shows a baby howler monkey clinging onto a young adult male capuchin monkey on Jicarón Island, Panama in September 2022. Photo by Brendan Barrett /Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior via AP
WASHINGTON — A baby howler monkey clung to the back of an older male monkey, its tiny fingers grasping fur. But they’re not related and not even the same species.


Scientists spotted surprising evidence of what they describe as monkey kidnappings while reviewing video footage from a small island off Panama. The capuchin monkeys were seen carrying at least 11 howler babies between 2022 and 2023.

“This was very much a shocking finding,” said Zoe Goldsborough, a behavioral ecologist at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany. “We’ve not seen anything like this in the animal kingdom.”

The monkeys’ motivations remain under investigation. Capuchins are house cat-size monkeys found in South America and Central America. They are long-lived, clever and learn new behaviors from each other. One group of capuchins in Panama has even learned to use stone tools to crack open nuts and seafood.


Goldsborough and other researchers at Max Planck and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute had set up more than 80 cameras to study capuchin tool use, but were surprised to see the first howler babies appear in early 2022.

The footage showed the capuchins walking and pounding their stone tools with baby howlers on their backs. But cameras did not capture the moments of abduction, which scientists said likely happened up in the trees, where howlers spend most of their time.

“Our window into this story is constrained,” said co-author Margaret Crofoot of Max Planck and the Smithsonian. The findings were published Monday in the journal Current Biology.

In most or all cases, the baby howlers died, researchers said. Infant howler monkeys would normally be carried by their mothers while still nursing. All the babies in the video — from a few weeks to a few months in age — were too young to be weaned.


“A hopeful part of me wants to believe some escaped and went back to their mothers, but we don’t know,” said Crofoot.

The videos recorded a few instances of young capuchin males still carrying howler babies that had died, likely from starvation. Many animals — from gorillas to orcas — have been observed carrying their own dead offspring, though scientists aren’t sure the reasons.

Why did the capuchin males do it? There were no signs of deliberate aggression toward the babies and they weren’t eaten, ruling out predation.

“We’ve all spent hours wracking our brains why they would do this,” said Goldsborough.

The first baby-snatcher may have had a confused “caring motivation,” or parental instinct, because he showed gentleness interacting with the infants, she said. Then four other males copied his actions.

The researchers said they don’t believe the capuchins harmed the babies on purpose. So far, only one group of capuchins has been known to kidnap.

The research shows the “remarkable behavioral variation across social groups of the same species,” said Catherine Crockford, a primatologist at the CNRS Institute for Cognitive Sciences in France, who was not involved in the study.
Monkeys-Kidnapping-Monkeys-2025-05-19[1].jpg
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
Doctors, patients warn of Lasik eye surgery perils after cop takes own life
Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published May 23, 2025 • Last updated 2 days ago • 3 minute read

Ryan Kingerski, Pennsylvania police officer who took his own life after complications from Lasik eye surgery.
Ryan Kingerski, Pennsylvania police officer who took his own life after complications from Lasik eye surgery.
The recent suicide of a young Pennsylvania police officer has revealed the agonizing aftermath for some over Lasik eye surgery.


Ryan Kingerski, a 26-year-old officer with the Penn Hills Police Department, took his own life after months of excruciating pain, double vision and chronic headaches due to complications from the surgery.

Now, more people have emerged to reveal that Kingerski’s situation is not an isolated one.

“Everyone has different problems when it comes to Lasik,” Miami-based optometrist Edward Boshnick told the New York Post.

He referred to the surgery as a “BS procedure” and “the biggest scam ever put on the American public.”

Boshnick added: “And it’s a multibillion-dollar business.”



Providers of Lasik eye surgery, or laser vision correction, say it is 95% to 99% safe.

The “simple” procedure uses an ultraviolet laser to reshape the cornea, improving vision without glasses or contact lenses.

Morris Waxler, the former head of the Food and Drug Administration branch responsible for reviewing data and approving the Lasik operation decades ago, now regrets the decision.

He told CBS in 2019 that his own analysis of industry data showed complication rates between 10% and 30%, and in 2011, he petitioned the FDA to issue a voluntary recall of LASIK, the Post reported.

“It didn’t matter what questions and concerns I had, because the surgeons were very powerful and still are,” Waxler said.

In 2018, Jessica Starr, a meteorologist in Detroit, hanged herself two months after undergoing Lasik due to intense eye pain and vision problems, according to her husband Dan Rose.


The widower told WJBK that Starr left behind a 30-page suicide note and videos, which explained her decision to take her own life was due to the elective surgery.

TV meteorologist Jessica Starr who took her own life following Lasik surgery.
TV meteorologist Jessica Starr who took her own life following Lasik surgery.
Former LASIK patient Paula Cofer, of Tampa, Florida, told the publication she had suicidal ideations for two years after her “disastrous” surgery in 2000.

She also claimed to know of at least 40 people who took their own lives because they couldn’t stand the constant pain and vision problems that developed after the procedure.

“I really didn’t want to stick around at times, but I decided I would to get the word out about how dangerous this surgery can be,” she said.

“The LASIK lobby and the surgeons will tell you only 1% of patients have issues afterward. That’s not true. There are multiple studies that indicate otherwise.”


Cofer added: “The percentage of those with poor outcomes are in the double digits, not 1%. And they know it.”

She acknowledged that not everyone has severe complications but “a lot more people are suffering than you know,” noting that she suffers from “floaters, severe dry eyes, induced astigmatism and severe night vision problems.”


Officer Kingerski, who underwent LASIK in August 2024, had similar symptoms.

His parents, Tim and Stefanie Kingerski, told KDKA about the side effects their son suffered post-surgery, including headaches and double vision, and seeing dark spots and floaters — small spots that appear as streaks.

“He kept saying how bad the pain in his head was. He had a terrible headache and wasn’t able to focus, and the vision and the blurriness and everything else — and that just continued,” his parents said.

“Regret was the big thing,” Stefanie said of their son, who would question, “‘Why would they do this to me? Why would they not tell me?’”



Ryan took his own life in January.

“He left us a note that said, ‘I can’t take this anymore. Lasik took everything from me.’ That’s the note that we got left,” Tim said.

Stefanie added: “That’s what we were left with.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
1 dead in New York sewage-boat explosion on Hudson River
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Published May 24, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 1 minute read

In this image from video provided by WACB-TV, homes are seen across the Hudson River from the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, foreground, in New York, after an explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage near the plant, on Saturday, May 24, 2025.
In this image from video provided by WACB-TV, homes are seen across the Hudson River from the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, foreground, in New York, after an explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage near the plant, on Saturday, May 24, 2025.
NEW YORK — An explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage that was docked on the Hudson River in New York City killed a longtime city employee Saturday, authorities said.


Another worker on the city-owned Hunts Point vessel was injured and taken to the hospital after the blast around 10:30 a.m. near the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, according to city Fire Department Deputy Assistant Chief David Simms. A third worker refused medical treatment.

The cause of the explosion was under investigation, but New York City Mayor Eric Adams said in statement that criminal intent was not suspected. The men on the boat, which takes raw sewage from the city to be treated, were doing work involving a flame or sparks when the explosion occurred, the U.S. Coast Guard said on social media.



First responders found a 59-year-old man unconscious in the river, New York police said, and he was declared dead at the scene.

The man had been a longtime employee of the city’s Department of Environmental Protection. His name has not been released, but the mayor said he was “a devoted public servant who gave 33 years of service to the New York City, and our hearts go out to his family, friends, and colleagues during this painful time.”

The blast spread raw sewage over the deck of the boat, and firefighters and other first responders had to be decontaminated, Simms said. DEP said there did not appear to be any environmental impacts following the explosion.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,563
3,488
113
1 dead in New York sewage-boat explosion on Hudson River
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Published May 24, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 1 minute read

In this image from video provided by WACB-TV, homes are seen across the Hudson River from the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, foreground, in New York, after an explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage near the plant, on Saturday, May 24, 2025.
In this image from video provided by WACB-TV, homes are seen across the Hudson River from the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, foreground, in New York, after an explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage near the plant, on Saturday, May 24, 2025.
NEW YORK — An explosion on a boat carrying raw sewage that was docked on the Hudson River in New York City killed a longtime city employee Saturday, authorities said.


Another worker on the city-owned Hunts Point vessel was injured and taken to the hospital after the blast around 10:30 a.m. near the North River Wastewater Treatment Plant, according to city Fire Department Deputy Assistant Chief David Simms. A third worker refused medical treatment.

The cause of the explosion was under investigation, but New York City Mayor Eric Adams said in statement that criminal intent was not suspected. The men on the boat, which takes raw sewage from the city to be treated, were doing work involving a flame or sparks when the explosion occurred, the U.S. Coast Guard said on social media.



First responders found a 59-year-old man unconscious in the river, New York police said, and he was declared dead at the scene.

The man had been a longtime employee of the city’s Department of Environmental Protection. His name has not been released, but the mayor said he was “a devoted public servant who gave 33 years of service to the New York City, and our hearts go out to his family, friends, and colleagues during this painful time.”

The blast spread raw sewage over the deck of the boat, and firefighters and other first responders had to be decontaminated, Simms said. DEP said there did not appear to be any environmental impacts following the explosion.
a shitty thing to happen. :poop: ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros