Probably because I know what it is.
Of course you can have both. In fact one can often lead to the other. Why wouldn't you be able to have both? That makes no sense. A person can still maximize their 'returns' while exercising another's plan.Well if that's true then if you can learn something else you'll know TWO things(nyuck nyuck nyuck)
Either politicians, corporate execs, and big-time academics are in the game for all they can get, or they're executing the EEE-vil master plan of the Overlords. Can't be both.
Define what they mean by that specifically. I doubt it's something most would be happy with. As they seem to see it the definition is more of a wealth distribution scheme, specifically OTHER people's wealth, not theirs.The WEF states that it's overarching philosophy is to ensure the continuation and dominance of stakeholder capitalism. Do you find that idea disagreeable?
I think you'll find most earned what they have from shareholder interests. Or non-capitalism based companies such as academia or gov't work or charities. Take gates for example - he got rich through aggressive shareholder capitalism, it wasn't till much much later in life that he got interested in the stakeholder's of the world.Consider they're people who've done pretty well out of stakeholder capitalism, that's not exactly a big surprise. To me, anyhow.
That's what they say.Stakeholder Capitalism as opposed to Capitalism?
Oh I know. That’s what they say. I was curious about what you were saying though with with “Stakeholder” Capitalism instead of just Capitalism.That's what they say.
Really, it's on their webpage. You don't have to look too far.
I've got my definition, can't say it's the same as theirs.Oh I know. That’s what they say. I was curious about what you were saying though with with “Stakeholder” Capitalism instead of just Capitalism.
If Russia uses gas or chemicals.......YES!Does that mean we will be declaring war on Russia ?
Sounds like crony capitalism to me .Stakeholder Capitalism as opposed to Capitalism?
What ever happened to slapping a fifty dollar bill on the forehead . Yikes inflation .I’ve googled news about Davos today to see what’s actually going on if anything, and the bulk of the new stories are about the prostitutes there. Spring break for billionaires & who is they get the party like billionaires for the week? Meh…
View attachment 17008
Maybe they’re back-up back-up security (behind the private security, which is behind the Swiss Guards).
I really no nothing about the subject and would rather just watch .If Russia uses gas or chemicals.......YES!
Putin made a no beard policy yesterday so expect gas or chemicals soon. Gas masks are almost useless with beards.
Shit is about to get really bad for Russians as it is. If they use gas or chemicals all bets are off.I really no nothing about the subject and would rather just watch .
Slap another $2,450.00 (in USD I’m assuming) & you’d probably be able to rent a Davos Prostitute….assuming you had the means and reason to be there.What ever happened to slapping a fifty dollar bill on the forehead . Yikes inflation .
Stakeholder Capitalism as opposed to Capitalism?
Define what they mean by that specifically. I doubt it's something most would be happy with. As they seem to see it the definition is more of a wealth distribution scheme, specifically OTHER people's wealth, not theirs.
I think you'll find most earned what they have from shareholder interests. Or non-capitalism based companies such as academia or gov't work or charities….
I’m sure it’s on their webpage. Stakeholder capitalism with respect to public policy would make governments just another stakeholder, and it would make corporations another stakeholder.That's what they say.
Really, it's on their webpage. You don't have to look too far.
Are governments not stakeholders in societies?Slap another $2,450.00 (in USD I’m assuming) & you’d probably be able to rent a Davos Prostitute….assuming you had the means and reason to be there.
I’m sure it’s on their webpage. Stakeholder capitalism with respect to public policy would make governments just another stakeholder, and it would make corporations another stakeholder.
Are governments just stakeholders in public policy? Are corporations?Are governments not stakeholders in societies?
It's OK to just admit you have no answer.Are governments just stakeholders in public policy? Are corporations?
I don’t even pretend to have an answer.It's OK to just admit you have no answer.
Yes and yes. Corporations are people too, according to Mitt Romney.Are governments just stakeholders in public policy? Are corporations?
Fuck no. Not even close. People and persons are polar opposites.Yes and yes. Corporations are people too, according to Mitt Romney.