'Cuba Will Continue to Commit the Sin of Existing'
- Thread starter peapod
- Start date
From the island Russia landed on recently how far away is DC at Mach30?
Thanks to Bama's bailout they are able to afford more than a rubber raft and an AK-47
Only a fuktard would claim getting their own money back was a 'bailout'. Way to lower the bar into the minus numbers for your side you mindless fuk.
BTW, only the air-frame was back engineered, they have their own engines and flight control systems.
BTW, only the air-frame was back engineered, they have their own engines and flight control systems.
Iran tried to send their warships in 2017 and they cancelled because they knew they'd never make it.
Seriously though... I am glad that the Iranians will finally attempt to navigate the Atlantic Ocean.
Last edited:
In Haiti?? No, the Clinton Foundation took it in and that was the last anybody saw of it. The cholera after was a bonus I guess, your kind sure has some strange ways. No wonder it is buried, why so shallow, that kind of shit needs to be deep-sixed and not talked about.
But, but, but Cuba is a socialist country - isn't that good? According to some people it is. Don't know why they don't go there instead of running down this despicable capitalistic society we currently have. Why, the socialist agenda is already in place so why not go where it's already been established instead of trying to change what we have here?? Hummmmmm?????
Just wondering...….
Just wondering...….
Americans are the stupidest species people on the planet. Are you trying to quality for one of the highest positions??
That would be the Jews.
A look at Jeffrey Epstein's inner circle, plus the lawyers and police involved in his case, including Alexander Acosta, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinko and Kenneth Starr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Imperial_State_of_Iran
According to one history of the use of torture by the state in Iran, abuse of prisoners varied at times during the Pahlavi reign.[3] While the shah's violation of the constitution, "trampling on the fundamental laws" and rights of Iranians, was one of the complaints of revolutionaries,[4][5] some have suggested the Shah's human rights record fares better than that of the revolutionaries who overthrew him. According to political historian Ervand Abrahamian,
"Whereas less than 100 political prisoners had been executed between 1971 and 1979, more than 7900 were executed between 1981 and 1985. ... the prison system was centralized and drastically expanded ... Prison life was drastically worse under the Islamic Republic than under the Pahlavis. One who survived both writes that four months under warden Asadollah Lajevardi took the toll of four years under SAVAK.[6] In the prison literature of the Pahlavi era, the recurring words had been "boredom" and "monotony." In that of the Islamic Republic, they were "fear," "death," "terror," "horror," and most frequent of all "nightmare" (kabos)." [7]
Following the pro-Shah coup d'état that overthrew the Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953, the Shah again cracked down on his opponents, and political freedom waned. He outlawed Mosaddegh's political group the National Front, and arrested most of its leaders.[22][full citation needed] Over 4000 political activists of the Tudeh party were arrested,[23] (including 477 in the armed forces), forty were executed, another 14 died under torture and over 200 were sentenced to life imprisonment.[22][24] [25]
Following this crackdown, conditions for political prisoners and opponents of the authoritarian government were relatively good for many years. "The bulk of Tudeh prisoners were released," and the remaining prisoners who refused to sign letters of regret were allowed to play ping pong, use a gymnasium, and watch television.[26] In the 1960s, the Shah also introduced electoral reforms expanding suffrage to women and ability to hold office to non-Muslims, as part of a broader series of reforms dubbed the White Revolution.[27] One exception to this relative calm was three days of rioting starting 5 June 1963 after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—a leading opponent of the White Revolution—was arrested. Troops fired on demonstrators in Jaleh Square "slaughtering not less than 15,000 people" according to Khomeini translator Hamid Algar.[28]
1971-1976
However, in 1971 a guerrilla attack on a gendarmerie post (where three police were killed and two guerrillas freed, known as the "Siahkal incident") sparked "an intense guerrilla struggle" against the government, and harsh government countermeasures.[29] Guerrillas embracing "armed struggle" to overthrow the Shah, and inspired by international Third World anti-imperialist revolutionaries (Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, and Che Guevara), were quite active in the first half of the 1970s [30][31] when hundreds of them died in clashes with government forces and dozens of Iranians were executed.[7] According to Amnesty International, the Shah carried out at least 300 political executions.[32]
According to a senior SAVAK officer, after the Siahkal attack interrogators were sent abroad for `scientific training to prevent unwanted deaths from "brute force".`[33] Methods of torture included sleep deprivation; extensive solitary confinement; glaring searchlights; standing in one place for hours on end; nail extractions; snakes (favored for use with women); electrical shocks with cattle prods, often into the rectum; cigarette burns; sitting on hot grills; acid dripped into nostrils; near-drownings; mock executions; and an electric chair with a large metal mask to muffle screams. Prisoners were also humiliated by being raped, urinated on, and forced to stand naked.[34] However, the torture method of choice remained the traditional bastinado used to beat soles of the feet.[34]
Torture was used to locate arms caches, safe houses and accomplices of the guerrillas, but another incident in 1971 led to the use of torture of political prisoners for another purpose. In 1971, a prisoner, Parviz Nikkhah [de; fa], serving a ten-year prison sense for communist subversion "experienced a genuine change of heart." He "astounded" the public by coming out in full support of the regime, starting a career working for the government Radio-Television Network" explaining how the Shah was a "true revolutionary".[35] So impressed was the regime with this conversion and its impact, it "did not take it long to go one step further and `induce` other `conversions.`"[36]
In 1975 the human rights group Amnesty International — whose membership and international influence grew greatly during the 1970s[38] — issued a report on treatment of political prisoners in Iran that was "extensively covered in the European and American Press".[39]
1976-1977
By 1976, this repression was softened considerably thanks to publicity and scrutiny by "numerous international organizations and foreign newspapers." In 1976, Jimmy Carter was elected President of the United States and he "raised the issue of human rights in Iran as well as in the Soviet Union. Overnight prison conditions changed",[40] and the Shah ordered an end to torture.[41]
Two nations getting away is enough to show the rest of the world that the only weapon the Jews have are lies in the press
Tic-toc mutherfuker.
Syria makes it 3 and that is why the US is imploding, your Jewish masters are not pleased and upsetting the insane is never a good idea. Pisspot Pete will need some consoling or do you just end up in the garbage when you no longer perform well for the collective. Bit like you, sent out all by yourself and this is the best effort you can put on for them. They do advance retards but even they are nit so stupid as to have ant big plans for any of the local collective.
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/f...n-rights-hypocrisy-media-170101112004892.html
"If there is one country that respects human rights, it's Cuba," he said. "The right of mothers to give birth safely is guaranteed here, children can study whatever they want at university and they don't pay a penny."
'If there is one country that respects human rights it's Cuba,' said Oscar Paez, right, at Antonio Maceo Square, Santiago [Ed Augustin/Al Jazeera]
Many prominent Cuban intellectuals, perhaps unsurprisingly, agree that Castro was a towering figure for the advancement of human rights, and that his internationalism helped redefine what human rights meant for the developing world.
Juan Valdes Paz, a professor emeritus of sociology at the University of Havana, argues that any discussion of human rights in Cuba - a former neocolony - has to be seen through the lens of national liberation.
"The revolution's first and most important achievement is something without which everything else - even health and education - would have been impossible: winning the country's sovereignty and independence," he said.
"Ever since the revolution, Cuba has maintained that all human rights are complementary and interdependent. It doesn't make sense to talk about political rights, if citizens are illiterate or if they don't have enough food to guarantee their survival. The Cuban approach is a very third world conception of what human rights are."
The Jewish version of how the locals in Central America, and the rest of the world, should be run when 'the lesser races' are found to be living there when the Jews come for the land.
11 Brutal Dictators Graduated from This US School
Breaking the Set's Manuel Rapalo travels to Fort Benning, GA for a massive rally aimed at shutting down the School of the Americas; a US Military training facility that is notorious for breeding some of the worst human rights violators in Latin America.
There is a lot more to their story, you can bet that Jewish MOSSAD was giving the US the instruction book as hunting people to the point of extinction seem to be a specialty with the Jews as it happens everyplace they go. Should I start a thread for that aspect of why their own God wants nothing to do with them, let alone providing help when Satan is hunting them to the point of extinction. Do you need the verses as I'm pretty sure God feels the same away about all their biggest fans.
Well I have other 'sheep' that I visit. I wonder why the Jewish collective that runs the place would disown all of this collective in a heartbeat.
Following the pro-Shah coup d'état that overthrew the Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953, the Shah again cracked down on his opponents, and political freedom waned. He outlawed Mosaddegh's political group the National Front, and arrested most of its leaders.[22][full citation needed] Over 4000 political activists of the Tudeh party were arrested,[23] (including 477 in the armed forces), forty were executed, another 14 died under torture and over 200 were sentenced to life imprisonment.[22][24] [25]
Following this crackdown, conditions for political prisoners and opponents of the authoritarian government were relatively good for many years. "The bulk of Tudeh prisoners were released," and the remaining prisoners who refused to sign letters of regret were allowed to play ping pong, use a gymnasium, and watch television.[26] In the 1960s, the Shah also introduced electoral reforms expanding suffrage to women and ability to hold office to non-Muslims, as part of a broader series of reforms dubbed the White Revolution.[27] One exception to this relative calm was three days of rioting starting 5 June 1963 after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—a leading opponent of the White Revolution—was arrested. Troops fired on demonstrators in Jaleh Square "slaughtering not less than 15,000 people" according to Khomeini translator Hamid Algar.[28]
1971-1976
However, in 1971 a guerrilla attack on a gendarmerie post (where three police were killed and two guerrillas freed, known as the "Siahkal incident") sparked "an intense guerrilla struggle" against the government, and harsh government countermeasures.[29] Guerrillas embracing "armed struggle" to overthrow the Shah, and inspired by international Third World anti-imperialist revolutionaries (Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, and Che Guevara), were quite active in the first half of the 1970s [30][31] when hundreds of them died in clashes with government forces and dozens of Iranians were executed.[7] According to Amnesty International, the Shah carried out at least 300 political executions.[32]
According to a senior SAVAK officer, after the Siahkal attack interrogators were sent abroad for `scientific training to prevent unwanted deaths from "brute force".`[33] Methods of torture included sleep deprivation; extensive solitary confinement; glaring searchlights; standing in one place for hours on end; nail extractions; snakes (favored for use with women); electrical shocks with cattle prods, often into the rectum; cigarette burns; sitting on hot grills; acid dripped into nostrils; near-drownings; mock executions; and an electric chair with a large metal mask to muffle screams. Prisoners were also humiliated by being raped, urinated on, and forced to stand naked.[34] However, the torture method of choice remained the traditional bastinado used to beat soles of the feet.[34]
Torture was used to locate arms caches, safe houses and accomplices of the guerrillas, but another incident in 1971 led to the use of torture of political prisoners for another purpose. In 1971, a prisoner, Parviz Nikkhah [de; fa], serving a ten-year prison sense for communist subversion "experienced a genuine change of heart." He "astounded" the public by coming out in full support of the regime, starting a career working for the government Radio-Television Network" explaining how the Shah was a "true revolutionary".[35] So impressed was the regime with this conversion and its impact, it "did not take it long to go one step further and `induce` other `conversions.`"[36]
By the end of 1975, twenty-two prominent poets, novelist, professors, theater directors, and film makers were in jail for criticizing the regime. And many others had been physically attacked for refusing to cooperate with the authorities.[37]
The nature of this torture was "infinitely worse" than torture for information, which being time sensitive, lost its function and was discontinued after a short period of time.[36]
In 1975 the human rights group Amnesty International — whose membership and international influence grew greatly during the 1970s[38] — issued a report on treatment of political prisoners in Iran that was "extensively covered in the European and American Press".[39]
1976-1977
By 1976, this repression was softened considerably thanks to publicity and scrutiny by "numerous international organizations and foreign newspapers." In 1976, Jimmy Carter was elected President of the United States and he "raised the issue of human rights in Iran as well as in the Soviet Union. Overnight prison conditions changed",[40] and the Shah ordered an end to torture.[41]
Two nations getting away is enough to show the rest of the world that the only weapon the Jews have are lies in the press
Tic-toc mutherfuker.
Syria makes it 3 and that is why the US is imploding, your Jewish masters are not pleased and upsetting the insane is never a good idea. Pisspot Pete will need some consoling or do you just end up in the garbage when you no longer perform well for the collective. Bit like you, sent out all by yourself and this is the best effort you can put on for them. They do advance retards but even they are nit so stupid as to have ant big plans for any of the local collective.
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/f...n-rights-hypocrisy-media-170101112004892.html
"If there is one country that respects human rights, it's Cuba," he said. "The right of mothers to give birth safely is guaranteed here, children can study whatever they want at university and they don't pay a penny."
Many prominent Cuban intellectuals, perhaps unsurprisingly, agree that Castro was a towering figure for the advancement of human rights, and that his internationalism helped redefine what human rights meant for the developing world.
Juan Valdes Paz, a professor emeritus of sociology at the University of Havana, argues that any discussion of human rights in Cuba - a former neocolony - has to be seen through the lens of national liberation.
"The revolution's first and most important achievement is something without which everything else - even health and education - would have been impossible: winning the country's sovereignty and independence," he said.
"Ever since the revolution, Cuba has maintained that all human rights are complementary and interdependent. It doesn't make sense to talk about political rights, if citizens are illiterate or if they don't have enough food to guarantee their survival. The Cuban approach is a very third world conception of what human rights are."
The Jewish version of how the locals in Central America, and the rest of the world, should be run when 'the lesser races' are found to be living there when the Jews come for the land.
11 Brutal Dictators Graduated from This US School
Breaking the Set's Manuel Rapalo travels to Fort Benning, GA for a massive rally aimed at shutting down the School of the Americas; a US Military training facility that is notorious for breeding some of the worst human rights violators in Latin America.
There is a lot more to their story, you can bet that Jewish MOSSAD was giving the US the instruction book as hunting people to the point of extinction seem to be a specialty with the Jews as it happens everyplace they go. Should I start a thread for that aspect of why their own God wants nothing to do with them, let alone providing help when Satan is hunting them to the point of extinction. Do you need the verses as I'm pretty sure God feels the same away about all their biggest fans.
Well I have other 'sheep' that I visit. I wonder why the Jewish collective that runs the place would disown all of this collective in a heartbeat.
It should have been to a playlist on the same topic, looks like somebody complained.
Real Time with Bill Maher: Americans Are Stupid (HBO)
Real Time with Bill Maher: Americans Are Stupid (HBO)
Walnut, what does 'google' mean in your world??
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the-37-year-standoff-over-irans-frozen-u-s-dollars-1482956855
When the shah of Iran fell in 1979, the U.S. froze at least $400 million of Iranian money sitting in a Pentagon trust fund. The Islamic Republic of Iran never stopped trying to get it back.
Tehran unsuccessfully sought the money from Jimmy Carter in return for 52 American diplomats held hostage for 444 days. It asked the Reagan administration for the same money during dealings that led to the Iran-Contra scandal. The issue came up yet again during negotiations with George H.W. Bush’s White House.
No administration agreed to surrender all the money, until Jan. 17, shortly after four American citizens were released from Iranian jails in a prisoner exchange. That is when an Iranian government Boeing 737 lifted off from Geneva’s Cointrin airport carrying $400 million—stacks of Swiss francs delivered on wooden pallets earlier that day by the U.S. government.
Over the past 18 months, Iran has detained at least three more American citizens for allegedly threatening the country’s national security. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani wants the U.S. to return another chunk of Iranian money, $2 billion frozen in 2009 in a Citibank account in New York. He has suggested that a deal similar to the one involving the $400 million could resolve the issue.
The Obama administration has said the $400 million payment, and another $1.3 billion paid in interest, wasn’t ransom but was part of a deal to resolve the long-running dispute over frozen assets once controlled by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The cash transfer, besides resolving the financial standoff, helped seal a nuclear agreement the U.S. and its allies negotiated with Iran’s leaders. White House officials also have said they hoped the deal might lead Iran to moderate its behavior.
In January 1981, Iran released the hostages after 444 days, but only after the Carter administration began transferring $12 billion of Iranian money back to Iran’s new rulers. Current and former U.S. officials involved in Iran diplomacy say that marked the first such financial trade-off. Some lawmakers argued it bordered on extortion or ransom.
The transfers didn’t include the money deposited in the Pentagon trust fund, a sensitive issue given Tehran’s revolutionary government, say the U.S. officials.
During the presidency of George H.W. Bush, U.S. lawyers at The Hague worked to settle all outstanding claims, an effort to improve ties with Iran under its business-minded President Hashemi Rafsanjani. In 1990, $200 million was returned to Iran from the Pentagon trust fund. Another settlement for a failed arms deal was reached in 1991.
Cubans forced to defy government to eke out existence
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny-metro-cuba-five-workers-20190102-story.html
Utopia.
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny-metro-cuba-five-workers-20190102-story.html
Utopia.