COVID-19 'Pandemic'
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Nobody, he’s the honey badger of CanCon.
Honey badger don’t give a shit.
Nobody, he’s the honey badger of CanCon.
Honey badger don’t give a shit.
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Well we are all going to die, eventually, so you're right about that. Where are these hills you keep mentioning? If that just one life was yours you would care right? Driving carefully is always a good thing, so right again. Communing with nature, a good thing. You enjoy fishing right? Carbon free existence? Probably not in my lifetime. Aw, the children...
Well we are all going to die, eventually, so you're right about that. Where are these hills you keep mentioning? If that just one life was yours you would care right? Driving carefully is always a good thing, so right again. Communing with nature, a good thing. You enjoy fishing right? Carbon free existence? Probably not in my lifetime. Aw, the children...
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Yeah I can see that. But hell, even a honey badger can have an off day.
Yeah I can see that. But hell, even a honey badger can have an off day.
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
The Bush Doctrine
Pre-emptive strikes
Bush addressed the cadets at the U.S. Military Academy (West Point) on June 1, 2002, and made clear the role pre-emptive war would play in the future of American foreign policy and national defense:
We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. We cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants, who solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systemically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long—Our security will require transforming the military you will lead—a military that must be ready to strike at a moment's notice in any dark corner of the world. And our security will require all Americans to be forward-looking and resolute, to be ready for preemptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and to defend our lives.
The stance of the Bush administration was that the harsh measures to spread the democracy worldwide are inevitable and efficacious, in which for instance, liberating Iraq will plant democracy in the area and enable it to flourish in the rest of the Middle East.[36]
Two distinct schools of thought arose in the Bush Administration regarding how to handle countries such as Iraq, Iran, and North Korea (the so-called "Axis of Evil"[37] states). Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, as well as U.S. Department of State specialists, argued for what was essentially the continuation of existing U.S. foreign policy. These policies, developed after the Cold War, sought to establish a multilateral consensus for action (which would likely take the form of increasingly harsh sanctions against the problem states, summarized as the policy of containment). The opposing view, argued by Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and a number of influential Department of Defense policy makers like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, held that direct and unilateral action was both possible and justified and that America should embrace the opportunities for democracy and security offered by its position as sole remaining superpower.
Because Trump and Fox News are playing the threatening game of blaming China for deliberately ":
DOES CHINA HAVE A RIGHT,
To destroy, say Tel aviv, Vegas, and Guam to test the waters?
I realise that its not like attacking Iran.\MAGA
The Bush Doctrine
Pre-emptive strikes
Bush addressed the cadets at the U.S. Military Academy (West Point) on June 1, 2002, and made clear the role pre-emptive war would play in the future of American foreign policy and national defense:
We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. We cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants, who solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systemically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long—Our security will require transforming the military you will lead—a military that must be ready to strike at a moment's notice in any dark corner of the world. And our security will require all Americans to be forward-looking and resolute, to be ready for preemptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and to defend our lives.
The stance of the Bush administration was that the harsh measures to spread the democracy worldwide are inevitable and efficacious, in which for instance, liberating Iraq will plant democracy in the area and enable it to flourish in the rest of the Middle East.[36]
Two distinct schools of thought arose in the Bush Administration regarding how to handle countries such as Iraq, Iran, and North Korea (the so-called "Axis of Evil"[37] states). Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, as well as U.S. Department of State specialists, argued for what was essentially the continuation of existing U.S. foreign policy. These policies, developed after the Cold War, sought to establish a multilateral consensus for action (which would likely take the form of increasingly harsh sanctions against the problem states, summarized as the policy of containment). The opposing view, argued by Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and a number of influential Department of Defense policy makers like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, held that direct and unilateral action was both possible and justified and that America should embrace the opportunities for democracy and security offered by its position as sole remaining superpower.
Because Trump and Fox News are playing the threatening game of blaming China for deliberately ":
DOES CHINA HAVE A RIGHT,
To destroy, say Tel aviv, Vegas, and Guam to test the waters?
I realise that its not like attacking Iran.\MAGA
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Guess you didn't watch this when I posted it 2 weeks ago duh..
Guess you didn't watch this when I posted it 2 weeks ago duh..
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
He's not even a real doctor, just a head shrink, one above a chiropractor. :lol:
He's not even a real doctor, just a head shrink, one above a chiropractor. :lol:
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
I'm glad to hear you think of me so much :lol:
Heart warming..
Rent Free Mr. C
Now run along back to your wigwam and go chew on some rawhide.
I'm glad to hear you think of me so much :lol:
Heart warming..
Rent Free Mr. C
Now run along back to your wigwam and go chew on some rawhide.
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Guess this is there way of swaying public opinion to get money from the government..
SAD either way..
Guess this is there way of swaying public opinion to get money from the government..
SAD either way..
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
US investigates possibility of Covid-19 spread originating in Chinese lab
https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/20...rency-covid-19-spread-pkg-culver-lead-vpx.cnn
(CNN News Source) :lol:
The money trail shows they knew of the virus for 2 months before letting the public know..
During this time they were buying up PPE from around the world to short everyone else, or Jack up the price.
US investigates possibility of Covid-19 spread originating in Chinese lab
https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/20...rency-covid-19-spread-pkg-culver-lead-vpx.cnn
(CNN News Source) :lol:
The money trail shows they knew of the virus for 2 months before letting the public know..
During this time they were buying up PPE from around the world to short everyone else, or Jack up the price.
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Canadian farmers warn they may 'sit out the season' unless government aid guaranteed
Canadian farmers warn they may 'sit out the season' unless government aid guaranteed
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Canadian Provinces are reopening their economies with Premier announcements coming out next week
Canadian Provinces are reopening their economies with Premier announcements coming out next week
Re: COVIDD-19 'Pandemic'
Like ours? Tam is an advisor and low end Scientist with the WHO, no wonder we had such mixed messages and slow response to the pandemic.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Theresa Tam works for the World Health Organization. She has to resign or be fired.
Like ours? Tam is an advisor and low end Scientist with the WHO, no wonder we had such mixed messages and slow response to the pandemic.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Theresa Tam works for the World Health Organization. She has to resign or be fired.