Confessions of a Climate Change Denier

[captain morgan]

Farmer's Almanac has always been of my favorite reads. Fun and good old fashion entertainment.

I also like Yankee, Reminisce, Grit, and Good Old Days.

.

Not familiar with Yankee, Reminisce, Grit, and Good Old Days.. I'll have to keep an eye out for them.

Farmers Almanac is a great publication, been around since the late 1800s... No nonsense commentary that is/was founded on years of experience and observation.

 

[taxslave]

The guy in the white smock has a mountain of scientific evidence to back up his claim. You don't. In fact, you haven't even tried to back up your religion with anything even remotely scientific. As I've said, I don't really care what religion you are but trying say the earth is the centre of the universe when the science CLEARLY says it isn't, makes people look a little silly.

making yourself look silly again. How did Thalidomide thingy work out for your science? And you think other people have religion.

 

[gopher]

Not familiar with Yankee, Reminisce, Grit, and Good Old Days.. I'll have to keep an eye out for them.

Farmers Almanac is a great publication, been around since the late 1800s... No nonsense commentary that is/was founded on years of experience and observation.

I promise you those are among the finest reading you will ever come across in your life. They use precisely the same formatting as Almanac and were influenced by it. GREAT wholesome reading.

 

[taxslave]

Kinda like the 3 outta 4 dentists that recommended trident gum as a proper way to take care of your teeth... I understand that they wear white smocks too

So do the guys in the looney bin.

 

[Cannuck]

How did Thalidomide thingy work out for your science? And you think other people have religion.

It worked out the way it was supposed to. When the science indicated there was a problem, it got dealt with. The guys in the smocks didn't ignore data just because it didn't jive with their religious beliefs. They leave that type of behaviour to the naturopaths.

A Close Look at Naturopathy

 

[taxslave]

It worked out the way it was supposed to. When the science indicated there was a problem, it got dealt with. The guys in the smocks didn't ignore data just because it didn't jive with their religious beliefs. They leave that type of behaviour to the naturopaths.

A Close Look at Naturopathy

Hardly an unbiased site. And full of $hit.

Science dealt with the problem they created by paying out a small amount for the damage they created on that one. How about the anti depressants that list side effects of depression and suicidal thoughts? Damm good koolaid that.

 

[Cannuck]

Hardly an unbiased site. And full of $hit..

I thought you would think so. I was also fairly confident you wouldn't refute anything on the site with anything that would remotely be considered scientific. Most uber religious people are like that

 

[Zipperfish]

making yourself look silly again. How did Thalidomide thingy work out for your science? And you think other people have religion.

Well, seeing as you have go back 50 years, I'd say that makes science look pretty good. Thalidomide is making a bit of a comeback too, I gather.

By the sounds of things I should peel out all the fiberglass insulation in my walls and fill them with CO2.


.

In think the logical error there is that you have assumed that since (a) carbon dioxide traps heat therefore (b) carbon dioxide must be the best substance for trapping heat.

 

[darkbeaver]

The guy in the white smock has a mountain of scientific evidence to back up his claim. You don't. In fact, you haven't even tried to back up your religion with anything even remotely scientific. As I've said, I don't really care what religion you are but trying say the earth is the centre of the universe when the science CLEARLY says it isn't, makes people look a little silly.

And what does science say IS the center of the universe? You say they say, clearly, what isn't, leading us to believe they in fact now the center. As a prominent and well loved poster here it is incumbent on you to respond with the full weight of your enlightenment concerning this center thingy. Merry Christmas in case I miss you later.

 

[Cannuck]

And what does science say IS the center of the universe? You say they say, clearly, what isn't, leading us to believe they in fact now the center. As a prominent and well loved poster here it is incumbent on you to respond with the full weight of your enlightenment concerning this center thingy. Merry Christmas in case I miss you later.

Um....you do know that the earth revolves around the sun don't you?

 

[darkbeaver]

By the sounds of things I should peel out all the fiberglass insulation in my walls and fill them with CO2.


Trident = 3 teeth.

I suggest you stop any further mention of the CO2 insulation barrier until I/you have had an opportunity to run it by a team of engineers/layers I know. I will send you a sketch of my proposal regarding this insulation breakthrough. The potential for sequestration in walls and ceilings has been developed in one of my labs. We are a hairs breadth away from marketing, perhaps you'd like some action.

Um....you do know that the earth revolves around the sun don't you?

Well, that's what we hear. I can't prove that though. But my question is innocent, merely inquizitive as to what you might have heard about the true center of the universe. Your response will be meet with respect and interest due a fellow science buff.

 

[Cannuck]

I can't prove that though.

That's too bad

 

[MHz]

I suggest you stop any further mention of the CO2 insulation barrier until I/you have had an opportunity to run it by a team of engineers/layers I know. I will send you a sketch of my proposal regarding this insulation breakthrough. The potential for sequestration in walls and ceilings has been developed in one of my labs. We are a hairs breadth away from marketing, perhaps you'd like some action.

Any Igloo builder will tell you there is an R-Value (as well as bear proofing the place) applied to a deep exhale of smoke. Less effective when blow into a timber framed house.

If the Pacific rift is spreading faster than normal then that will heat up the water down deep and the westward flow from the Anericas is current based rather than wind based. Any winds that do cross it will pick up more moisture and if that is to the north then Alaska will get rain in the form of snow and BC Coast fans can wear shorts all year around. If that water gets as warm as the Atlantic does the hurricanes will also form at the magic temp . This map also show the Atlantic where the east side of Greenland is warm and the rift and current flow would result in warm water rising as it approaches land. No idea why the red arrow is there.

The vid about snowball earth would prove that a warm ball getting covered by snow a mile deep will actually end up acting like a blanket that keeps heat in rather than letting it radiate at a 'normal rate'. The end result is the same as when a pressure cooker blows it's lid. We would know it as beer foaming over container. Popping a cork is also a term used to describe an overheating event. Say the GOM and Hudson Bay are exit wounds rather than impact marks then the moon is a creation of two volcanoes that went off and the material went so high it never came back down. The current theory of a moon sized object colliding with the earth would have shattered both bodies into another asteroid belt until they were gobbled up by other bodies. The 'boil theory' would be proven by finding out what caused the end of the last iceage, if 1/3 of the globe getting an increase in R-Value via snow cover then the extra heat would have let out hot rock that fell as ash on the ice to a depth that seeds could sprout and all of that attracted heat from above and below.

 

[DaSleeper]

More utter nonsense.....

 

[MHz]

Um....you do know that the earth revolves around the sun don't you?

Right on time every year also. One of the first 'miracles' in the Bible was god telling Noah about a flood that would come when it was a weather change that would not take place for 100 years. Perhaps if we could do that we could avoid a disaster being bigger than it has to be.

More utter nonsense.....

The sequence suggested is in error, that the water arrived as snow is not fiction as space is a cold place, snow can smother a fire a lot faster than rain so the snowball effect did happen, if you have a better explanation as to what would happen to the heat the core is producing I'm all ears, or post the vid that supports it. This vid is just to use as a reference, the mechanics is the part in question. In the very start it would be that no water existed on earth before the 'moon' incident, the earth was spinning in perfect balance and the magma was being sorted according to gravity. Water would have been in the form of 'ice' and early on it would have melted before impact, the ascension to 'cooler places' would have started a cycle where each drop cooled more area that 1B new drops could. Vapor before liquid and liquid followed by ice.. I'm just suggesting the core heated up to an extent that the first explosion was the size of the GOM and HB combined, if it was 'a pressure cooker style' of explosion it went high rather than the laterial spread of the Siberian Traps. If the material that the moon was made from came from those explosions then perhaps the GOM affected the spin and when that 'rocket motor' stopped the 'ice' was no longer in sync, the HB one could have put in the 23deg tilt if the core is not at that same rhythm. Either way the material ejected would be in a spray that would not have it ever return to the same place it left. How much heat was available in an explosion where the dia of the two events is about 1600 miles? (and the part that doesn't fall back is the part that is the moon, 2x or 3x that material would have been added to the ice as fine ash) he 'blanket of ice is 1 mile deep' so sharpen that abacus as the number has to have the oceans at the temp they are today.

 

[DaSleeper]

More utter nonsense.....

Bump

 

[MHz]

How about heat value needed to transform ice that is -250deg is water that is +50deg using the current water volume?