Conditions for the divorce

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
Jealousy means: the husband does not accept any dishonor on the part of his wife; the thing that abolishes such jealousy is the drinking of wine and the eating of pork.

I surprise from such people who do not admit the truth, and who ignore many facts:
Don't you know that about the same thing is in the Torah revealed to Prophet Moses?
And in the Quran it is better organized and more logical and more moral and higher in honor and purer to the original command of God.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Definition of JEALOUS

1 disposed to suspect rivalry or unfaithfulness
2 hostile toward a rival or one believed to enjoy an advantage
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
Definition of JEALOUS

1 disposed to suspect rivalry or unfaithfulness
2 hostile toward a rival or one believed to enjoy an advantage

You being a woman, may not realize what it is. It is not the jealousy of one woman with another woman.
Among the virtues are the jealousy of the man, and chastity of the woman.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Jealousy means:
the husband does not accept any dishonor on the part of his wife;
But it seems that your people think it is ok for the husband to be unfaithful and then they blame the woman for the husband's actions.
the thing that abolishes such jealousy is the drinking of wine and the eating of pork.
But your people would rather kill a woman because her husband cheated than eat pork or drink wine. You people really are fµcked up between the ears.

You being a woman, may not realize what it is.
I think I do and I want nothing to do with your definition of jealousy.
Among the virtues are the jealousy of the man, and chastity of the woman.
But not the chastity of men and the jealousy of the woman. Exactly. Like I said, that is really fµcked up.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Religious groups of all kinds, in general, are pretty much cults, IMO. I believe this because as much as every darn one of them says "We know the Truth!", they don't and can't know. If you want to believe in your version of God - and yes, it is a version - that's great. But your belief cannot be forced upon others for doing so makes it more than a cult really. Be free to share your version of God, just don't claim your version is THE version everyone should worship.

According to you, they are. Women - who are people - are treated like cattle, so are children. Your own words state that bloodlines are important, not the love of the woman, the care of the woman. Men can do what they wish, it's up to the woman to guard herself against the weakness of men. Men have no control, it's up to women to have all the control... except they're weak and pretty much worthless unless they breed a bunch of kids.

If you haven't noticed, Muslim men can pretty much do whatever they want and women must pretty much obey the men in their life. So in your religion, they can do whatever wherever and whenever they wish and if a woman says no, she's beaten or worse, can lose her life. And while I'm sure you'll say "that doesn't happen" - Rape. The woman is blamed in every case I've ever heard regardless of circumstances. A man's excuse is ALWAYS believed: she provoked him.

To your religion, women are cattle, they are animals. The men cherish them only so long as they don't fight and they obey their words. If they dare think for themselves, you punish them.

That is being animals. That is not being human.


This is where they've changed the meaning of cherish to mean possess, own, enslave. Because to cherish something means you NEVER break it, you NEVER damage it, you treat it like it's fragile and deserving of EVERY consideration for ITS well being and that IS NOT what how women are treated. They are treated the EXACT opposite of that.

That being said it makes you wonder just how much other "scripture", "holy writings"," holy decrees" etc have been F'd with so self serving mysogynistic, barbaric, ignorant men can enslave, control and rape and abuse women to their black hearts content, eh?

Good news is that the wives' families will honor kill them, so no alimony!

and no investigation either. win win for the men...again...
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Jealousy means: the husband does not accept any dishonor on the part of his wife; the thing that abolishes such jealousy is the drinking of wine and the eating of pork.

Nothing better than a ham sandwich with a glass of white wine. Or pickled pigs feet& beer.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,981
2,789
113
New Brunswick
Jesus is truthful; but the narrations and passing of time and other factors made many alterations in the religion of God.
The religion of God was before Moses; Moses was not the first prophet.
But the law was made clear with Moses; God revealed to him the Torah to be a light and guidance to the Children or sons of Israel.
Jesus came and said: he would not change the Law; the Law had been made by God Almighty: the Jews call Him: Yahweh; He is the same Creator and Lord of all nations; although some of them try to mislead themselves and misleads others that Yahweh is not God and not Allah and not Khodah.
Anyhow, God the Creator: He revealed the Law to Moses, and Jesus worked according to the Law of God.
The Quran came to correct the mistakes and the alterations that occurred in the Torah, specially that Torah written by Ezra son of Siraeh: which is the present Torah included also in the Old Testament.
The religion of God is the same: with only some moderations according to the circumstances and according to the time.

So you cannot say there is no divorce. How can that be: when one of the two spouses commits adultery?

But the meaning, that you did not read the first post in this thread: because you don't want to discover the truth about the Quran: i.e. this is very difficult to you: you want to blind yourself.

If man divorces his wife, and another one marries her, the first husband cannot return her to him and cannot marry her once again . This is in the Torah and in the Quran according to the interpreter Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly.

The other point which even many Muslims do not know: Neither the husband nor the wife may demand the divorce without a justified cause: either the adultery of one of them, or the wife is disobedient to her husband (she is impolite: goes wherever she wants and does whatever she likes and does not comply with her husband.)

And another reason for the divorce: if there is a mutual agreement of both the husband and wife.

Other than this, the divorce is not allowed.

Bolded the most relevant part of your post, SS.

In your religion, women are slaves, property, possessions, things. They are not people. This is one of the many reasons why people are disgusted by your religion. Women are people, they have rights, they have liberties and no one, no man, has the right to control her.

You can say your religion is as pure as the sun is gold but it's false, a lie. It's as dirty as the pigs and dogs you despise. Actually, your religion is *worse* than said animals. At least they are living according to how they were created. Your religion is by CHOICE and by interpretation, not actual fact. Just like the bible, it was written by Man/Men, people in power who wanted to stay in that power and people in powers are often liars in order to keep that power.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
So a woman who is being ab used by her husband has to stay and be abused for the rest of her life. That is really stupid.

Where does Jesus make that statement, Cliffy?

According to this:
Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery."

that would make 2 choices for the individual leaving an abusive marriage. To either stay with the abuser or never find another person to commit and share their life with because to do so they'd be committing adultery. Which is a sin against god/jesus isn't it?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
That being said it makes you wonder just how much other "scripture", "holy writings"," holy decrees" etc have been F'd with so self serving mysogynistic, barbaric, ignorant men can enslave, control and rape and abuse women to their black hearts content, eh?
You forgot an adjective: gynophobic. It probably paralyses those men with insane amounts of fear to think of a woman having any control over them.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
True that. Dik diks are smaller than a lot of dogs. haha

Oooohhh, you meant their penÏses. I see.

:D
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,981
2,789
113
New Brunswick
You forgot an adjective: gynophobic. It probably paralyses those men with insane amounts of fear to think of a woman having any control over them.

Likely that's why we went from a Goddess worshiping society to either God or multi-God with Goddess' under a male God's control.

Male fear over the power of a woman. Cuz, y'know, we BLEED 'n nasty stuff like that! :D
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
Well if the woman is impolite and she is corrupt: she goes as she likes; then she is not honest and may commit adultery secretly, why should any man retain her as wife, according to YOUR religion?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Well if the woman is impolite and she is corrupt: she goes as she likes; then she is not honest and may commit adultery secretly, why should any man retain her as wife, according to YOUR religion?

Ya, you should at least be entitled to get your goats back.

Those s!uts ....
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Well if the woman is impolite and she is corrupt: she goes as she likes; then she is not honest and may commit adultery secretly, why should any man retain her as wife, according to YOUR religion?
And if men are like that it's ok.
That is called hypocrisy.
"HYPOCRISY
the behavior of people who do things that they tell other people not to do : behavior that does not agree with what someone claims to believe or feel"
Like I said, unintelligent, frightened cowards.
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
[The Divorce]

{Quran 2: 227. For a those who intend to desert their wives, they shall wait four months; if they change their minds and revert [and take their wives back], then God is Most Forgiving [for them], Most Merciful [to their wives.]

[But if the husband insists on the separation, and he does not go back in his word, then the wife will have the right to demand the divorce, and the judge shall oblige the husband to divorce her if he does not agree about coming back to his wife. This is the meaning of His saying – be glorified – in the following aya:]

228. But if they resolve on the divorce, then surely God is All-Hearing [of their words], All-Knowing [about their deeds.] a a

229. Divorced women shall wait [in home, before marrying another man] for three [menstrual] periods b.
It is not lawful for them to conceal what [fetus] God has created in their wombs c, if [truly] they believe in God and the Last Day d.
And their husbands have the right better [than others] to restore them in such case e, if the [husbands] like to set things properly f.
And [wives] have rights [over their husbands] similar to those [of their husbands] over them, with appropriate way g; but the men have an authority [to be obeyed] over them h.
God is All-Mighty
i, Most Wise j.}
.....................................................
a The addressing is to the Prophet and judges; it implies: the statement for those who intend and determine to desert their wives because they dislike them; and one of them say: "I have decided that I shall never bring my wife back", or say: "I have determined that I shall not bring my wife to my house, but she should stay with her family forever; or he assigns for her a period of time and say: for seven years or more or less; even if he swears for that, then his oath is regarded as vain talk, and is not taken into consideration, unless he swears for a period of less than four months; in such instance it should be fulfilled and he should not break his swearing. So the statement for such men is that the wife waits for four months, i.e. his wife waits for him with her family for four months. So after this period, the husband should return her to his house and reconcile with her.

a a [While the statement for the imprisoned with four years and over; he should divorce his wife if she is young not old, that is in case she agrees about the divorce.
But if he does not divorce her, and in case the wife wants the divorce; then the judge shall divorce her by force.
So if he comes out of prison after elapsing of the [stated prison] period, to find his wife not married to another man, and it is the first divorce or the second, then he can marry her once again.

While the man who divorced his wife twice, then he restored her before he was imprisoned, then the choice of the third divorce shall be by the hand of the wife: if she wants the divorce, he shall divorce her; and if she wants to stay as his wife until he comes out of prison; and in both cases, the choice of the divorce is by the hand of the wife for the man imprisoned for four years and over.

As regards the absent man, and about whose fate nothing is known whether he is dead or he is living: like the one who goes to war and does not return or nothing is known about him, or the captive by the hand of the enemy and nothing is known about him or another one who is absent from his family and does not return: these will also have four months period, then when the period elapses and the husband does not come back, the wife shall have the right to demand the divorce from the judge; so that the father, grandfather, uncle or his companion (in case the husband has no living father or grandfather) shall do the divorce, or [even] his deputy or guardian or the men among his heirs.

So the judge shall assign one of the kindred of the lost husband, as his deputy and guardian in order that the deputy and the judge shall carry out the divorce of the wife and write for her the bill of the divorce and give it to her, and that is after proving by witnesses and evidences that her husband is lost since four years and nothing is known about him, neither has any message nor has any information been received about him.

On the other hand, if it is known that the husband is living, or a message is received from him, and he refuses to come back, then the judge shall send him a warning that if he does not come back to his family after forty days, then the judge will divorce his wife. Then if he does not return after that stated period, neither does he send his wife any answer, then the wife shall have the right for the divorce.

Afterwards if the husband returns to find his wife not married to another man, then he will have the right to take her back, but if he finds her married to another man, then he will not have any right to take her back and she will stay as a wife of the new husband.

In summary, the separation should not last more than four:
>> for the present husband: four months then either the return or the divorce.
>> And the lost or prisoned husband: four years after which either the return or the divorce.

While the statement of the inheritance for the wife whose wife is lost or nothing is known about him: she inherits her husband starting from the first day of his absence: she will have the eighth if her husband has a son; and she will have the fourth if her husband has no son; and her right in the inheritance will not be dropped unless her husband returns and it is evident that he is alive.

Moreover, her divorce by the judge or her marrying another man does not drop her right of the inheritance:
>> if her husband is alive, the inheritance will be instead of the Nafaqa : [the due money given to the woman after the divorce],
>> and if he is dead, then she is more worthy of the inheritance.

b i.e. she shall stay at home waiting [without marrying another man] until three menstruations will elapse; while the woman who has no menstruation, then her waiting time will be three months; according to His saying – be glorified – in the Quran 65 : 4, which means:
(As for your women who have despaired of further menstruation [because of a disease or affliction], if you are in doubt [concerning their pregnancy], their prescribed period [or interim or Idda] shall be three months, as [shall the interim be of] those [old women or after the menopause] who menstruate not.)
It means: Either of 'women who have despaired of further menstruating [e.g. because of a disease]', and '[old women] who menstruate not' at the time of divorcing them; each one of all such women has (the Idda: or the stated period) of three months.

c Because some of divorced women hates her husband, therefore she conceals her pregnancy lest she should be returned to her husband after the divorce; or because she loves another man whom she likes to marry, so she conceals her pregnancy: because the husband has the right to restore his divorced wife in case she is pregnant, and she has no right to refuse that even after elapsing of the Idda :) the stated time following the divorce.)
While the non-pregnant whose Idda has elapsed, the choice will be of the wife: if she agrees to return, she may return to him; and if she likes to marry another man, then she will marry as she likes.

d i.e. if truly she believes in God and in the judgment and punishment of Doomsday, then she must not conceal her pregnancy, because God will punish her. This sentence is for frightening and threatening with punishment for the divorced women who conceal their pregnancy.
The "Last Day" is Doomsday, which has been explained in the Quran 2: 126.
e i.e. the husband of the divorced woman is more worthy – than others are – to restore her during the period of the Idda, and more worthy of her if she is pregnant even though after the Idda, but on condition …if the [husband] likes to set things rightly.

f between them and their wives with friendly dealing, giving the Nafaqa [: the due money of the divorce] and offering her the required dresses as he can afford.

g i.e. with the proper thing that the husband can afford: like the Nafaqa [: the due money of the divorce], the dressing, the good friendly dealing, spending the night with her, so that he does not leave her and go to the adulteresses [and prostitutes], and he should not betray her with adultery or homosexuality, just as he dislikes that she may betray him.

h i.e. the wife should obey her husband, so that she does not go out of the house unless he allows her to do so, and she should obey him and comply to his orders excepting that which God forbids; but in case she disobeys his orders, then she is a Nashiz (i.e. haughty disobedient.)

i In His kingdom: He punishes those who contradict His statements.

j With His statements, so that He does not command you but only with that which is proper for you.

The interpretation is by Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly.
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Your ancient tribal customs are both quaint and barbaric.

Women are not chattel nor are they livestock.

God is nowhere in sight, here.

You live by Satanic rules.
 
Last edited:

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
[The Divorce]

{Quran 2: 227. For a those who intend to desert their wives, they shall wait four months; if they change their minds and revert [and take their wives back], then God is Most Forgiving [for them], Most Merciful [to their wives.]

[But if the husband insists on the separation, and he does not go back in his word, then the wife will have the right to demand the divorce, and the judge shall oblige the husband to divorce her if he does not agree about coming back to his wife. This is the meaning of His saying – be glorified – in the following aya:]

228. But if they resolve on the divorce, then surely God is All-Hearing [of their words], All-Knowing [about their deeds.] a a

229. Divorced women shall wait [in home, before marrying another man] for three [menstrual] periods b.
It is not lawful for them to conceal what [fetus] God has created in their wombs c, if [truly] they believe in God and the Last Day d.
And their husbands have the right better [than others] to restore them in such case e, if the [husbands] like to set things properly f.
And [wives] have rights [over their husbands] similar to those [of their husbands] over them, with appropriate way g; but the men have an authority [to be obeyed] over them h.
God is All-Mighty
i, Most Wise j.}
.....................................................
a The addressing is to the Prophet and judges; it implies: the statement for those who intend and determine to desert their wives because they dislike them; and one of them say: "I have decided that I shall never bring my wife back", or say: "I have determined that I shall not bring my wife to my house, but she should stay with her family forever; or he assigns for her a period of time and say: for seven years or more or less; even if he swears for that, then his oath is regarded as vain talk, and is not taken into consideration, unless he swears for a period of less than four months; in such instance it should be fulfilled and he should not break his swearing. So the statement for such men is that the wife waits for four months, i.e. his wife waits for him with her family for four months. So after this period, the husband should return her to his house and reconcile with her.

a a [While the statement for the imprisoned with four years and over; he should divorce his wife if she is young not old, that is in case she agrees about the divorce.
But if he does not divorce her, and in case the wife wants the divorce; then the judge shall divorce her by force.
So if he comes out of prison after elapsing of the [stated prison] period, to find his wife not married to another man, and it is the first divorce or the second, then he can marry her once again.

While the man who divorced his wife twice, then he restored her before he was imprisoned, then the choice of the third divorce shall be by the hand of the wife: if she wants the divorce, he shall divorce her; and if she wants to stay as his wife until he comes out of prison; and in both cases, the choice of the divorce is by the hand of the wife for the man imprisoned for four years and over.

As regards the absent man, and about whose fate nothing is known whether he is dead or he is living: like the one who goes to war and does not return or nothing is known about him, or the captive by the hand of the enemy and nothing is known about him or another one who is absent from his family and does not return: these will also have four months period, then when the period elapses and the husband does not come back, the wife shall have the right to demand the divorce from the judge; so that the father, grandfather, uncle or his companion (in case the husband has no living father or grandfather) shall do the divorce, or [even] his deputy or guardian or the men among his heirs.

So the judge shall assign one of the kindred of the lost husband, as his deputy and guardian in order that the deputy and the judge shall carry out the divorce of the wife and write for her the bill of the divorce and give it to her, and that is after proving by witnesses and evidences that her husband is lost since four years and nothing is known about him, neither has any message nor has any information been received about him.

On the other hand, if it is known that the husband is living, or a message is received from him, and he refuses to come back, then the judge shall send him a warning that if he does not come back to his family after forty days, then the judge will divorce his wife. Then if he does not return after that stated period, neither does he send his wife any answer, then the wife shall have the right for the divorce.

Afterwards if the husband returns to find his wife not married to another man, then he will have the right to take her back, but if he finds her married to another man, then he will not have any right to take her back and she will stay as a wife of the new husband.

In summary, the separation should not last more than four:
>> for the present husband: four months then either the return or the divorce.
>> And the lost or prisoned husband: four years after which either the return or the divorce.

While the statement of the inheritance for the wife whose wife is lost or nothing is known about him: she inherits her husband starting from the first day of his absence: she will have the eighth if her husband has a son; and she will have the fourth if her husband has no son; and her right in the inheritance will not be dropped unless her husband returns and it is evident that he is alive.

Moreover, her divorce by the judge or her marrying another man does not drop her right of the inheritance:
>> if her husband is alive, the inheritance will be instead of the Nafaqa : [the due money given to the woman after the divorce],
>> and if he is dead, then she is more worthy of the inheritance.

b i.e. she shall stay at home waiting [without marrying another man] until three menstruations will elapse; while the woman who has no menstruation, then her waiting time will be three months; according to His saying – be glorified – in the Quran 65 : 4, which means:
(As for your women who have despaired of further menstruation [because of a disease or affliction], if you are in doubt [concerning their pregnancy], their prescribed period [or interim or Idda] shall be three months, as [shall the interim be of] those [old women or after the menopause] who menstruate not.)
It means: Either of 'women who have despaired of further menstruating [e.g. because of a disease]', and '[old women] who menstruate not' at the time of divorcing them; each one of all such women has (the Idda: or the stated period) of three months.

c Because some of divorced women hates her husband, therefore she conceals her pregnancy lest she should be returned to her husband after the divorce; or because she loves another man whom she likes to marry, so she conceals her pregnancy: because the husband has the right to restore his divorced wife in case she is pregnant, and she has no right to refuse that even after elapsing of the Idda :) the stated time following the divorce.)
While the non-pregnant whose Idda has elapsed, the choice will be of the wife: if she agrees to return, she may return to him; and if she likes to marry another man, then she will marry as she likes.

d i.e. if truly she believes in God and in the judgment and punishment of Doomsday, then she must not conceal her pregnancy, because God will punish her. This sentence is for frightening and threatening with punishment for the divorced women who conceal their pregnancy.
The "Last Day" is Doomsday, which has been explained in the Quran 2: 126.
e i.e. the husband of the divorced woman is more worthy – than others are – to restore her during the period of the Idda, and more worthy of her if she is pregnant even though after the Idda, but on condition …if the [husband] likes to set things rightly.

f between them and their wives with friendly dealing, giving the Nafaqa [: the due money of the divorce] and offering her the required dresses as he can afford.

g i.e. with the proper thing that the husband can afford: like the Nafaqa [: the due money of the divorce], the dressing, the good friendly dealing, spending the night with her, so that he does not leave her and go to the adulteresses [and prostitutes], and he should not betray her with adultery or homosexuality, just as he dislikes that she may betray him.

h i.e. the wife should obey her husband, so that she does not go out of the house unless he allows her to do so, and she should obey him and comply to his orders excepting that which God forbids; but in case she disobeys his orders, then she is a Nashiz (i.e. haughty disobedient.)

i In His kingdom: He punishes those who contradict His statements.

j With His statements, so that He does not command you but only with that which is proper for you.

The interpretation is by Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly.
See? That is a perfect example of what I mean by unintelligent, frightened cowards.

And some other "men" are frightened of Islam/Sharia coming here. The women of North Am would castrate men before that happened. It's extremely unwise to piss off your cook.
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
[In the Jahiliah (or the "Ignorance" pre-Islam period), they used to divorce their wives then to restore them many times, in order to offend and humiliate the woman; so God – be glorified – forbade them from such customs, and said:]

Quran 2: 230. The divorce [that may be followed by restoring the woman back] is [permissible] twice [only] a, and then [the woman must] either be retained with honor or amicably released b.
And you [husbands] are not allowed to take any part of [the dowry c] which you gave to them d,
unless both of the [husband and wife] fear that they cannot keep within 'the statements prescribed by God' e,
so if you [judges] fear that they may not be able to keep within 'the statements prescribed by God' f then no blame on either of them concerning the [dowry] with which the [wife] ransoms herself. g
These h are 'the statements prescribed by God', so trespass them not i; and whoso trespasses 'the statements prescribed by God' – these indeed are the wrong-doers j.

231. But if [her husband] divorces her [a third time], then she shall never be lawful to him afterwards k: in order to marry another husband. l

But if the [second husband] divorces her [for the first time], there is no blame on both of them to come together again m, if they insist to observe 'the statements prescribed by God'.
These [statements] are 'the statements prescribed by God' which He [shall] explain [in the future] to a people who know [and discern.]

......................................................
a And that is before the consummation of the Idda (or the prescribed period of time), so he says: "I have restored my wife", and he brings the witnesses to bringing her back again;
but if the Idda (or the prescribed time) elapses, then he should consummate the marriage with a new marriage certificate, with only a little dowry according to a mutual agreement of the couple, and he should write a new marriage bill, to which some witnesses sign; that is lest some of the heirs should not deny when one of the couples dies, and say: "The wife of my father is divorced and she hasn't any right in the inheritance", or any other kind of denial.

b It means: Either will the husband keep her with him to treat her gently and kindly without wrangling, quarreling and abasement; or will he divorce her and send her to her family amicably: by giving her her due Nafaka (or the due money of the divorce) for three months, and then the matter will be concluded.

c Whether it is the "dowry in advance" or the "postponed dowry".

d In case you divorce them.

e 'The statement prescribed by God' for the husband is to divorce his wife, if he despairs of himself and becomes certain that he is unable to do the sexual intercourse: and so he should give her her dowry, and should not take any part of it; and he should give her the Nafaqa of the Idda: (i.e. the due money of the stated time after the divorce.)

On the other hand, the wife should be chaste, should not commit adultery, but she should forbear patiently, until her husband restores his capability for the sexual intercourse, or he may divorce her with his own accord.
So these are the "statements prescribed by God" that both the husband and wife should observe.

While their fearing about such statements:
[The wife]:
First: The wife fears that the lust of the animal nature may overcome her, so she may commit adultery if a long time passes and the sexual power of her husband is not restored.
Second: The wife fears that he will not divorce her unless she ransoms herself with her dowry.

[The husband]:
On the other hand, the husband fears that he may divorce his wife, then he may restore his sexual power later on, when he will have no money to marry another woman.
Second: He fears that she may demand of him her "postponed dowry", if he divorces her: while he is poor and cannot afford it.

f That is because the wife cannot stay without sexual intercourse, and you [judges] fear lest she should commit adultery if her husband does not divorce her, because she is young and not an old woman; and because you know that the husband is poor and will not divorce his wife unless she drops her due dowry.

g i.e. no blame on either of them concerning the dowry which the wife ransoms herself with; and no blame on the husband to take the dowry which she offers to him in order to have the divorce.
Therefore, the wife waits for one year, then if no positive result appears with her husband, then she has the right to demand the divorce.

This aya includes also the elderly man in case his wife is young and she does not love him, and she is afraid that Satan or the Devil may suggest to her and she may commit adultery while her husband does not know; therefore, she says to her husband: "Divorce me and I offer my dowry to you."

So when there is a mutual agreement between the couple concerning the divorce, then there is no blame on either of them concerning the dowry that she ransoms herself with.

The aya includes also the man having some defect of a chronic disease or blindness or he is disfigured, while his wife is a beautiful young woman and she does not love him.

h Statements which We have explained to you.

i By working contrary to them.

j i.e. they wrong themselves and their wives.

k But she shall be unlawful to him forever.

l i.e. so that she will marry another husband, and the problem will be over: so there will be no quarrelling, no wrangling after the separation.

Then God – be glorified – explained that the divorce statement of the wife with her second husband is like her divorce statement with the first:

m if there is a mutual agreement between the couple, but on condition that they should observe 'the statements prescribed by God' without quarrelling or disputing as was she with her first husband …

And if God – be glorified – had meant by His saying which means: (there is no blame on both of them to come together again): that she will come to her first husband, as did the commentators say, then there should have been another new marriage court decision, a new dowry and a new marriage ceremony.

Therefore, God – be glorified – meant by the permission of the coming back together, is the coming back together with her second husband, in case it is the first or second time of divorce, but if it is the third time of divorce, then she will be unlawful to him forever, and there cannot be any returning of her, nor a new coming back together, and not any new marriage contraction or certificate.

It is mentioned in the Torah, a similar revelation in the Book of Deuteronomy, chapter 24:
"1 When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out from his house,
2 and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man’s wife,
3 and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife,
4 then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the Lord"

And you may say: What have we to do with the Torah, while we are Muslims and we have the Quran?

I say answering you: Aren't the heavenly laws the same: Doesn't God – be glorified – say in the Quran 4: 26, which means:
(God likes to explain to you, and to acquaint you about the rites of those before you, and to turn towards you; God is All-Knowing, Most Wise.)

The interpretation is by Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly.
 
Last edited: