Nitrates for watering crops?Nitrates...get your spring tested sometime.
Nitrates for watering crops?Nitrates...get your spring tested sometime.
I am not against free trade.
However, I assure you... this is charity. This is not trade. Thinking logically about this I doubt Canada can provide water for many impoverished nations without footing the whole bill. So then that will mean money to help them update their sewerage and clean water facilities. Money that will be squandered on UN overhead and a balance will go to the government officials of these impoverished and as always spent on things other than what it was intended for. Some of it will trickle down to a village or two for a photo op.
If they can't provide their own safe drinking water, then they have very little to trade.
I'm not so much as a protectionist but I am becoming a bit more of an isolationist. Not a total isolationist but I think we should butt out a lot less than we have. We just don't have the money like we used to. We're in so much debt that we can't afford to keep flushing money away.
Gov't use money responsibly? You are joking aren't you?
And who is stopping them from drilling their own wells? Other than expecting the government to pay(us taxpayers). The rest of us managed to create some kind of water systems for ourselves without government money.I guess you would have to explain that to some of the members of the Canadian First Nations who still do not have safe clean water. The following article gives an example. Perhaps that is the real motive in abstaining. After all it might be a little awkward if the government of Canada actually had to ensure that all Canadians have clean water.
CBC News In Depth: Aboriginal Canadians
Their society broke down so only bullies get anything, and the bullies are too lazy to work.Who lives in the harbour? Or do people live far inland in places where you just can't drop off a tractor or bag of grain?
If you needed aid where you live would you walk to Vancouver to go get it? How would you get you new plow and bag of seed back to MB?
What good is aid if it is not distributable?
And who is stopping them from drilling their own wells? Other than expecting the government to pay(us taxpayers). The rest of us managed to create some kind of water systems for ourselves without government money.
I've worked on several rez sewer & water systems on the coast and there is no reason that we should have needed to do these with taxpayer money especially in the more remote ones where unemployment is in the 80% plus range and any change in job prospects is less than zero. It is not like there is a shortage of fresh water here. Simple economics dictates that these places should cease to exist just like many other communities have.
It's the next best thing, isn't it? (Assuming there is water of some kind available).Would you settle for a filtration system over clean water?
I expect people like you are preventing them, by objecting to the funding of a basic human necessity. But not to worry they are only a bunch of Indians.
Don't know much do you.
No, but I have no problem knowing more than you.
In your unending ignorance you are missing the point.
There is no reason to be pouring billions of tax dollars into clean water systems in communities that have no chance of economic survival. I don't care what color of skin the residents have. These villages on the coast are remote. Air or water transport only. What they may have had for industry at one time has closed up and moved on. By keeping these places going all we are doing is creating another generation of dysfunctional welfare recipients, no different than many of the small villages in Newfoundland.
BP, the owner of the oil that spilled in South Korea, and Enbridge (Battle Creek Michigan oil spill) would agree with you.There is one reason for pouring billions into these systems; It is effective in providing a clear conscious for those that feel that money solves all problems.
There is one reason for pouring billions into these systems; It is effective in providing a clear conscious for those that feel that money solves all problems.
That would be fine if it was their money, but it is not.:-(
In your unending ignorance you are missing the point.
There is no reason to be pouring billions of tax dollars into clean water systems in communities that have no chance of economic survival. I don't care what color of skin the residents have. These villages on the coast are remote. Air or water transport only. What they may have had for industry at one time has closed up and moved on. By keeping these places going all we are doing is creating another generation of dysfunctional welfare recipients, no different than many of the small villages in Newfoundland.