CIA Concludes Russia Influenced Election to Help Trump Win: Source
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
the hell are you on about cuck? :lol:
ah...you're just new to posting/quoting. I get it. :lol:
Trump good. Hillary bad. Anything more complex than that throws him for a loop
Mine would have been 'Karma's a bitch ain't it?' even if if it is foolish to talk to the dead. I think the suddenness and the finality in the clip is why I will never forget it, for better of for worse.
The last time I felt like that is when these sudo activists came down to protest the seal hunt only to discover the herd of 10,000 had been swept out to sea where they drowned. Karma says 'drop your sign and go get drunk'.
The last time I felt like that is when these sudo activists came down to protest the seal hunt only to discover the herd of 10,000 had been swept out to sea where they drowned. Karma says 'drop your sign and go get drunk'.
you mean like the fact you couldn't even properly quote the dude you were talking to a page back in this thread? :lol:
i quoted as it was wrote, so what are you on about?
and fake news?
feel free...prove away
Nice, you found someone that looks like you.
Joe Scarborough warns Trump: CIA can cut your administration to shreds with leaks – and they will
annnnnd...there we have it boys and girls.
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“I know who leaked them,” Murray told The Guardian. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day.
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian | BizPac Review
There were rumours that China was involved rather than Russia. Tomorrow, who knows? Grand Fenwick, maybe?
as for the kiddies and cucks that still wanna believe:
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian
A hole has been blown in the Democratic Party, and mainstream media’s narrative, that Russia was behind the leak of DNC emails to Wikileaks.
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.
“I know who leaked them,” Murray told The Guardian. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.
Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day.
Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian | BizPac Review
There were rumours that China was involved rather than Russia. Tomorrow, who knows? Grand Fenwick, maybe?
as for the kiddies and cucks that still wanna believe:
This is the game I play with friends who believe this story. If they got hacked, on whose watch did it occur? If you absolutely believe these allegations, better be prepared to point fingers at the persons responsible for not catching it.
It wouldn't matter. Let's say Trump got on the phone with Putin and said, "Use your magic and make me president."
That would mean the sitting president and his agencies were incapable of stopping a New York businessman and Putin. They were incapable of recognizing any early warning signs, informing the prez, and acting on it. That also means that they would have arrested the Donald.
But none of that happened because it didn't happen.
The Dems are certainly pouty-faced over Hillary's loss.
That would mean the sitting president and his agencies were incapable of stopping a New York businessman and Putin. They were incapable of recognizing any early warning signs, informing the prez, and acting on it. That also means that they would have arrested the Donald.
But none of that happened because it didn't happen.
The Dems are certainly pouty-faced over Hillary's loss.