If it was Walnut's I would, . . . as long as the rest of him is still at his home.I wouldn't even fukk her with Water's dick
This isn’t about Kavanaugh, do you think the same tactic was not planned for whoever the nominee was ?
now this is where Walter should be saying ad hominem is a poor argument.It would have been interesting the crap that would have been thrown by the Dems. if the chick would have been selected for the nomination to SC.
Yeah, you be sure to let us know if he ever tells the truth.Telling the truth makes him extremely qualified to be on the court. This whole thread could easily be put in the TDS thread cuz that’s the impetus behind the Kavanaugh smear.
You didn't realize that? I see, you don't expect the judiciary to be judicial, and expect the political branches not to be political.But he's not wrong. Right from the get-go various Democrats said they would block ANY SC nomination by Trump. I didn't realize an SC nominee was supposed to be impartial while his character is being assassinated for purely political purposes.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/409117-why-kavanaugh-case-will-kill-republicans-in-the-midterms
Why the Kavanaugh case will kill the GOP at midterms
But make no mistake, even if the FBI gives Kavanaugh a clean bill of health for his nomination, this will play out to the detriment of Republicans who already are down by 7 points to 8 points in the generic ballot for Congress. Republicans may have saved themselves from committing harakiri with their last minute decision to involve the FBI, but it is unclear whether that will do more than delay a slow death for a longer period.
you mean the election where 3 million more people voted for Hillary?
It does when someone is talking about percentages of people who votedWhich means absolutely nothing in the North American voting system!![]()
btw Hillary got 54% of the female vote versus 42% for Trump
as usual you have a tenuous grasp of the facts.
what you meant to say was that a majority of white woman voted for trump
Something we have never seen from you .About as accurate as most of your other "facts"
I do congratulate you for admitting an error.