Don't be absurd you know he can't ask the dead. Didn't some capitalist country bomb NK back to the stone age some time ago causing starvation among other hideous malidies? I seem to remember something to that effect.
Capitalism can not eradicate poverty
- Thread starter gore0bsessed
- Start date
Don't be absurd you know he can't ask the dead. Didn't some capitalist country bomb NK back to the stone age some time ago causing starvation among other hideous malidies? I seem to remember something to that effect.
Yes they are.
You need a dose of reality to wake you up from your idealism about communism.
The second link is. I missed that. But you ignored the first one.
And you still have not shown me a success story about a communist country.
No, that's not communist. If a state owns and controls everything, that's totalitarianism. Communism aims to have the workers in control of the means of production (machinery, factories, tools, land, etc.)
Show me one communist country that hasn't been drastically influanced or interferred with by some capitalist country.
It seems a bit odd that when an ideologue makes claims, they do not produce evidence but when someone denies their claims, they demand evidence.
Feckin put up or shut up.
Feckin put up or shut up.
Communism | Definition of communism by Merriam-Webster
So communist countries are supposed to be completely isolated from the rest of the world. I see.
Just like any know it all, he likes to talk down to the " stupid" folks .He's got it all figured out and if you've a mind to have an opposing viewpoint that makes you,,in his mind a moron. You've just not read enough on the subject don't ya know.
Well, that does not bother me so much. What does bother me is that when I asked for evidence, all I got was dogmatic drivel.
Like I said PT, show me a case of a successful communist country or STFU.
There is a reason why so many communist countries are dropping the ideology. And it is not because communism works.
Show me a successful communist country.
BTW, I am not a liberal. I am a bit more complex than that. I like some ideals from a lot of ideologies, but not one is pure nor perfect.
By HarperCons's definition, there has never been a communist country, so he can't show you a successful one.
There has never been a country where the workers owned the means of production. They have always been owned by the bosses or the state (another set of bosses).
The only places where the workers are even able to own the means of production are, ironically, the big, bad, EEE-vil capitalist countries, where co-ops, partnerships, and worker ownership of stock are relatively common. (though admittedly not a large part of the economy).
All true, but labour remains the ultimate commodity.
You're changing the subject. I read about that sh it. Where is the rest of the world, in your opinion?
Meh Life is.
It is a round. hahaha I crack me up.
In order for a country not to be influenced by other countries, it must be totally isolated.
So you entertain the thought that the brain isn't maintained by labour? Who or what the fu ck feeds you?
All the people I use my brainpower to get to do the work.So you entertain the thought that the brain isn't maintained by labour? Who or who the fu ck feeds you?
And the work of your brain takes very little labour I suppose. Automatic maybe, like a bug.
Why do you bother to eat?
To make sure some useless little bastard in Sudan doesn't get it.And the work of your brain takes very little labour I suppose. Automatic maybe, like a bug.
Why do you bother to eat?
The brain is nothing more than a computer: accumulating, storing and accessing data. It can only regurgitate the data it has stored. I admit that some have faulty hardware but it remains that it is nothing more than hardware.