With all this hype about cutting public funding for parties, I was just wondering how much cuts to parties would really affect the popular vote.
Personally, I find that I'm not influenced by fancy TV ads in the least. I usually just want to know the candidate's character and that's it. I couldn't care less if he's rich or poor, or even unemployed, as long as he has the character I beleive is needed to serve the community.
Inversely, an expensive suit, a fancy car, TV ads, etc. will not get my vote for a candidate if his character is found wanting. I don't care how handsome he is or how beautiful she is. I'd vote for a toothless man of character over such rifraff any day.
For those of you who oppose cuts to parties, are you really telling me that you vote for glitzy TV ads? If so, please don't vote 'cause this is a matter of public policy, not poopoolarity contests, as Chretien so eloquently put it.
Personally, I find that I'm not influenced by fancy TV ads in the least. I usually just want to know the candidate's character and that's it. I couldn't care less if he's rich or poor, or even unemployed, as long as he has the character I beleive is needed to serve the community.
Inversely, an expensive suit, a fancy car, TV ads, etc. will not get my vote for a candidate if his character is found wanting. I don't care how handsome he is or how beautiful she is. I'd vote for a toothless man of character over such rifraff any day.
For those of you who oppose cuts to parties, are you really telling me that you vote for glitzy TV ads? If so, please don't vote 'cause this is a matter of public policy, not poopoolarity contests, as Chretien so eloquently put it.