I'm sure if you make her
that face, she'll totally leave you alone!!
LOL!! Hilarious.
Grrr... I wasn't the only person to point out that Ryland has had a lot of professional experience. Apparently he even won some award, according to another poster. I also thought the stuff I heard on his MySpace sounded great.
I never did get the criticisms this person made about Miami, either, re Ryland. You would never have guessed that was a first try, for that band, if you didn't know. I listen to so many YouTube videos of live bands, and even many established ones sound bad live. And this one sounded good. Three new songs introduced, and people 'got' them right away, and most loved them. If the presentation had sucked, if the rhythm sucked, that could not have happened.
One thing I notice is how, online, someone says something authoritatively and then a lot of people start parrotting it. It could be a mere opinion but if it's stated like a fact people seem to follow it. When this happens, I have a strong urge to nip it in the bud. I really don't want "Ryland sucks and needs to be replaced" to be an opinion that somehow becomes accepted as a "fact". There's something about him I like. He seems to be good at his job, and also he seems to be a character. Which I like. The fact that he put on the Ed Harris t-shirt Friday put a smile on my face. I have a feeling he and Kris are compatible, and I'll bet he's a good guy. I want him around.
Whether this is a permanent band, at this point, though, I don't know.
Nice review of the album, from Syracuse. Doesn't say much, but it's positive:
Kris Allen's deut drops Tuesday | American Idol Thoughts - syracuse.com
I've come to a conclusion about reviews. Which you guys may disagree with. I don't care what they say, I don't care how boneheaded they may be, as long as they're positive! My feeling about them is based on reviews
as promotion. You only have to look at Adam's reviews on tour. I appreciate a thoughtful, intelligent critique as much as anyone, but I honestly think people skimming the paper mostly read the headline and scan a review quickly, with one thing in mind, "Is it (the performer, the album, the TV show) good, or is it bad?" Or maybe: "Should I like this or not?"
This is how a lot of people I know are. "That movie? It's supposed to suck. The paper said so." So good reviews are, to me, good promo.
Here's another B-. This one is from Long Island Newsday. Very short. This guy loved Kris on the show, if it's the same guy who reviewed the show for this paper. (I think it is). The guy seems to think Kris is better than the music he's doing here. ('
BOTTOM LINE: "Idol" makes best of a tough situation.') I wonder if a lot of reviews are going to suggest Kris is stuck doing an "Idol" album. I really don't feel that, myself.
Kris Allen's post-'American Idol' debut CD
And now, a blurb about LLWD from yet another person who says, "At first I thought I was listening to The Script." Gee, does every song of The Script's sound like LLWD, or something? Because I listened to some of their stuff and I don't think I could pin down LLWD as a Script song if I didn't already know it was. My point, I guess, is: do these people really mean that this was their initial reaction? Or, have they heard it's a Script song and are just being clever after the fact? Opinions, differing or otherwise, are welcome and encouraged.
Big music week ahead | Off The Charts