I could actually give you a serious answer to that question, but we both know it would be wasting my time.
"I would prefer that a leader of a party hold only Canadian citizenship, because one represents many Canadians, and for me that means that it's better to remain the citizen of one country,"
John Gilbert Layton
How 'bout it tommy boy?
![]()
First they wanted fixed election dates now they complain that the Cons have lots of money given to them by hundreds of thousands of donors.The textbook case for why government shouldn't operate like a business .
Federal election 2015: How a long campaign will benefit the cash-rich Tories
http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/f...n-will-benefit-the-cash-rich-tories-1.3173208
Suddenly, the taxpayers don't matter anymore.
I'very already spoken to a few of my local candidates for the upcoming Federal election, and I hate to say it but unless one if them shows more independent thinking, I might be casting yet another blank ballot. I'm sick of casting blank ballots. I'm considering my local libertarian candidate, but even that with hesitation.
Never mind policy. Here's how I see the campaign unfolding:
Don't vote for Mulcair because he committed treason by getting French citizenship.
Don't vote for Trudeau because of his age.
Don't vote for Harper because he's scandal-ridden.
Okay, that's nice. So who should we vote for?
Shrinking is improving.The Libertarian Party would shrink the size of government too, which is about all I like about it. If you're not going to improve the structures of government, then the next best thing is to shrink it maximally.