Feel free to get mad at me yet again
I think you are mistaking contempt for anger.
OK, Jin, V, I hear you. This kinda cuts against petros's desire for immigrants with skills and good credit ratings.
I don't have a major problem with immigrants with skills and good credit ratings. I have an economic problem with immigrants who come here and who do not earn enough under our progressive income tax system to actually pay tax. I also take issue with the social aspects of replacing what I think of as a pretty tolerant, kind, fair and just culture with whatever a mass of third-world foreigners decides on. Because none of them come from nations with very kindly or tolerant value systems.
I also have a problem with the whole justification for mass immigration. The noted British economist Paul Collier pointed out that mass immigration hurts third world nations a lot by siphoning off many of their better educated people. It also hurts the poor and lower middle class in destination nations by lowering wages, standards, and social benefits. Who does it help? The rich, of course. Corporations in destination countries, and those who own most of the stock in them love it.
Back in 1984 Canada's immigration level was about 85,000. Canada's then immigration minister ( representing a Toronto riding with high immigration) wanted to triple immigration. According to a media report she tried to convince them it would boost the economy. But a report commissioned by the Economic Council of Canada said it might help a bit, might hurt a bit, depending on the immigrants. So what settled the issue? She told cabinet new immigrants tended to vote for the party in power when they came in, and letting in so many immigrants would guarantee the Progressive Conservative Party a new influx of loyal voters.
So we tripled immigration purely for political reasons. Which is the reason we're increasing it now. There is no real economic justification for this.
McDougall Wins Battle To Increase Immigration - Immigration Watch Canada