Can muslims be good canadians?

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You must have a really picky definition of "good". 0.o

Not at all.

It's simply that Islam is not conducive to a free and open society.

And before anyone blows a gasket, I'm well aware of the irony in that statement. I'm also well aware that there is literally hundreds of thousands of Muslims living peacefully in Canada. At the moment.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Not at all.

It's simply that Islam is not conducive to a free and open society.

And before anyone blows a gasket, I'm well aware of the irony in that statement. I'm also well aware that there is literally hundreds of thousands of Muslims living peacefully in Canada. At the moment.
Most religions in general aren't conducive to free and open societies. "Good" is a relative term.
Anyway the first question was the title: "Can muslims be good Canadians?" As you said, there are many Muslims doing fine here. So obviously those ones can be good Canucks.
Second; "What do you think?"
Third; "Can a good Muslim be A good Canadian?" Like I said, "good" is relative.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Most religions in general aren't conducive to free and open societies.
Not true. North America was founded by Christians, look how it turned out.
"Good" is a relative term.
Agreed, and reletively speaking, Muslims are not good.
Anyway the first question was the title:
OK
"Can muslims be good Canadians?"
No.
"What do you think?"
Islam conflicts with the tenets of a free and open society.
"Can a good Muslim be A good Canadian?"
No.

How's that?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Not true. North America was founded by Christians, look how it turned out.
*snorts* Founded by Christians? Hardly. People been wandering around on NA for at least 20,000 years.
Everything's perfect alright. roflmao
Agreed, and reletively speaking, Muslims are not good.
Well, I beg to differ.
OK
No.
Islam conflicts with the tenets of a free and open society.
No.

How's that?
Better. :D
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Yes, most Muslims are good Canadians. They have their share of radicals, as do we Christians. I know of a few Muslims and they made excellent co-workers, and I have a few who are neighbors. They are active in the community, and so far have been good neighbors.

Quite so. I expect they are no better or worse than anybody else. We know quite a few Muslims too, most of the doctors.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
*snorts* Founded by Christians? Hardly. People been wandering around on NA for at least 20,000 years.
Everything's perfect alright. roflmaoWell, I beg to differ.
Better. :D


I suspect Mr. Bear was speaking of Canada's European founders. Aboriginal Canadians really did not have much say in it as most of them were dead and the remainder disenfranchised.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Not true. North America was founded by Christians, look how it turned out.
Free and open are also very relative terms, but I think the key point in that context is that the people who founded Canada and the United States (I don't know enough about Mexican history to offer an opinion) may indeed have been Christian, at least nominally, but Christianity wasn't what motivated them and they gave Christianity no real secular authority. Moreover, if you read the works of some of America's founding fathers (Paine, Jefferson, Franklin...) you could make a pretty strong case that America's foundations are atheist, or at most vaguely deist, but certainly not Christian. America's founders well understood that vesting religious and secular authority in the same people and institutions is a prescription for tyranny, hence the Establishment Clause, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Canada's founding documents give religion no authority at all except the right to set up separate school systems. Canada and the United States are not Christian nations and were not created on Christian principles. They are secular states based largely on the values of the European Enlightenment, a key feature of which is that religion officially has no place in the councils of the nation.

Actually I think America's founders were secularists and Canada's founders were inebriated Scotsmen making a business deal. :smile:
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
*snorts* Founded by Christians? Hardly. People been wandering around on NA for at least 20,000 years.
Everything's perfect alright. roflmaoWell, I beg to differ.
Better. :D

I have served with Muslims, after you get used to their ways they could become very good Canadians as well as Americans. They all are not like Ahab IEEEeeeii poof. Achmed Sings Christmas Songs http://break.com/index/achmed-sings-christmas-songs.html?matchid=?matchid=
There are Liberal-Muslims out there who would keep a perfectly normal Canadian life,.
Watch Achmed The Terrorist Video | Break.com

Best of all the ones I know have good personalities.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
*snorts* Founded by Christians?
Yes, Christians.

Hardly. People been wandering around on NA for at least 20,000 years.
They were not wandering around NA, they inhabited the Turtles back. North America is what the Europeans called the new world. What we have and live in today, is due in large part to their presence.
Everything's perfect alright. roflmaoWell, I beg to differ.
It may not be perfect, but you certainly don't have to worry about my clan coming to wipe out yours, so we can have more hunting grounds to survive the winter.

I suspect Mr. Bear was speaking of Canada's European founders. Aboriginal Canadians really did not have much say in it as most of them were dead and the remainder disenfranchised.
You would be correct.

Free and open are also very relative terms, but I think the key point in that context is that the people who founded Canada and the United States (I don't know enough about Mexican history to offer an opinion) may indeed have been Christian, at least nominally, but Christianity wasn't what motivated them and they gave Christianity no real secular authority.
True, but to be honest, given the various discussions on their motives, I would say that any statement to that effect would be open to lengthy debate. But I would still feel it safe to say, that they were Christian, and they yearned for freedom. Which included the separation of Church and State.

Islam is incompatible with that value.

Moreover, if you read the works of some of America's founding fathers (Paine, Jefferson, Franklin...) you could make a pretty strong case that America's foundations are atheist, or at most vaguely deist, but certainly not Christian.
This is a discussion that many scholars have had, and as learned as I know you to be, many smarter men then you or I, have discussed this to death, with no written in stone resolution.

I will concede that the founding fathers of the US placed a wall between Church and state, with good reason, and in so doing became secularists. And will readdress this in a moment. Islam on the other hand, does not separate Church and state. Hence my position.

Now, back to the Founding of the US. Have you read the Declaration of Independence? The Constitution made the Republic, well, a Republic, the Declaration was mans declaration as a "God" given right to be free from tyranny.

Even though the founding fathers, in all wisdom, placed that wall between the Church and the State. They very well were Christians, and they very well did found the nation under the guiding principals of their religion, a more balanced and far more fair interpretation thereof.

They new that surely a Crown brings tyranny, they were also well aware that the Cloth does to. And I agree.

America's founders well understood that vesting religious and secular authority in the same people and institutions is a prescription for tyranny, hence the Establishment Clause, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
Exactly. Mean while, God permeated much of the founding American subconscious.

Canada's founding documents give religion no authority at all except the right to set up separate school systems. Canada and the United States are not Christian nations and were not created on Christian principles.
Come on Dex, that's an unrealistic claim. A new Nation, founded by a predominantly Christian people, was not influenced by Christianity?

The very fact that the majority were raised as Christians defeats that claim. If they were raised Hindu or Buddhist, you would see that influence in the foundations of our respective nations.

Separation of Church and State, does not mean free from influence. Just because the founding fathers were secular, does not mean that they were not influenced by the religion in which they grew up in.

I'm neither a Christian, nor am I European, and yet I can see the very tangible contributions of both, to the creation of North America.

They are secular states based largely on the values of the European Enlightenment, a key feature of which is that religion officially has no place in the councils of the nation.
Again, I agree and yet it permeates both governments.

Actually I think America's founders were secularists and Canada's founders were inebriated Scotsmen making a business deal. :smile:
Now that's funny, if not a tad true.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I have served with Muslims, after you get used to their ways they could become very good Canadians as well as Americans. They all are not like Ahab IEEEeeeii poof. Achmed Sings Christmas Songs http://break.com/index/achmed-sings-christmas-songs.html?matchid=?matchid=
There are Liberal-Muslims out there who would keep a perfectly normal Canadian life,.
Watch Achmed The Terrorist Video | Break.com

Best of all the ones I know have good personalities.

We know a Muslim couple. He is a school teacher, she is a school principal. She earns more than him. He is a great guy to have a beer with.
 

foukay

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
26
0
1
Toronto
fouklone.livejournal.com
Personally, I don't think this is even a legit question. The quality of a person shouldn't he judged by his/her religion, culture, or way of living. The real question that shoul be asked is whether Canadians can be good Canadians. We live in a nation where we are free to believe and practice religion. Growing up in this kind of environment, where people continue with their beliefs and their culture, makes one into a very open minded person. Canada is a diverse nation where questions like these are just pure idiocy.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Personally, I don't think this is even a legit question.
It sure is a legit question.

The quality of a person shouldn't he judged by his/her religion, culture, or way of living.
When the tenets of that religion, dictate that the freedom of other be limited, if not snuffed out, yes, judging them harshly and taking steps to prevent that is not only legitimate, but wise.

The real question that shoul be asked is whether Canadians can be good Canadians.
Agreed, and in so doing as a good Canadian, I say we ban Islam.

We live in a nation where we are free to believe and practice religion.
Agreed, and so long as we keep allowing other cultures to infect our host culture, that freedom will steadily erode, until it is all but a distant memory.
Growing up in this kind of environment, where people continue with their beliefs and their culture, makes one into a very open minded person.
Agreed, it also helps one assess issues with certain aspects of religions, that are not conducive to a free and open society.
Canada is a diverse nation where questions like these are just pure idiocy.
Absolutely incorrect. Canada is a diverse nation where important questions like this should be asked and answered.

That's why we're a free and open society.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Islam is incompatible with that value.
Agreed, in Islam the church IS the state.
...many smarter men then you or I...
Who would they be? :lol:
A new Nation, founded by a predominantly Christian people, was not influenced by Christianity?
Of course the influence is there, it could hardly be otherwise, but I don't think that's what I claimed. The founding documents contain no explicit mention of Christianity or Christian principles as such and grant no authority to the church in government. U.S. documents directly forbid an official state religion or favouring one religion over another, Canadian documents achieve pretty much the same effect by omission. Individual civil rights and freedoms are fundamental to what we think of as modern democracy, and they're not Christian concepts.
... yet it permeates both governments.
Agreed as well, especially with the current crowd in Ottawa. People will of course be guided by their individual beliefs and values, but secular law trumps religious law.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Who would they be? :lol:
;-)
Of course the influence is there, it could hardly be otherwise, but I don't think that's what I claimed. The founding documents contain no explicit mention of Christianity or Christian principles as such and grant no authority to the church in government.
I made no claim of this either. Other then the Declaration of Independence of course.

U.S. documents directly forbid an official state religion or favouring one religion over another, Canadian documents achieve pretty much the same effect by omission. Individual civil rights and freedoms are fundamental to what we think of as modern democracy, and they're not Christian concepts.
Oh yes they are. The magna Carta was very much an influence on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Charter. In the US this has been acknowledged by the American Bar Association and was highlighted during the 1976 American Bicentennial celebrations. Shall I post the the prologue of the Magna Carta for you?

And of course this brings me back to my original comment. North America was founded by Christians, look how it turned out.

I've been beaten by Christians, my people decimated by Christians, my culture torn a sunder by Christians. Yet here, in a country founded on Christian principals, by Christians, I can pick on Christians, I can call out the gov't, I can pretty much say and do a whole litany of things, that I would be otherwise be brutally murdered for in a Muslim country. And to be quite frank, I have only been threatened with death once for my religion and who I am. And can you guess what religion that person quoted to me when he made the very real threat?

As far as I'm concerned, that is reason enough to keep Islam in the ME.

Agreed as well, especially with the current crowd in Ottawa. People will of course be guided by their individual beliefs and values, but secular law trumps religious law.
Agreed as it should be, which brings me back to your first response...

Agreed, in Islam the church IS the state.
Hence my opinion of Islam.
 
Last edited:

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Shall I post the the prologue of the Magna Carta for you?
No need, I have a copy of it, and I just re-read it. I don't see that it supports your point. It's about limiting the power of the King over his nobles and officials, many of whom were clerics and very much a part of the apparatus of the state at the time, and to some extent still are.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
No need, I have a copy of it, and I just re-read it. I don't see that it supports your point.
The sixth word in, is but the first reference to his lordship.

It's about limiting the power of the King over his nobles and officials, many of whom were clerics and very much a part of the apparatus of the state at the time, and to some extent still are.
Agreed. It's under whose authority and by what virtue, that makes my case for, North America was founded by Christians.

Do you think we've sufficiently hijacked the thread yet? :lol:
 

foukay

New Member
Mar 30, 2010
26
0
1
Toronto
fouklone.livejournal.com
It sure is a legit question.
I guess, entitled to our own opinions I suppose?

When the tenets of that religion, dictate that the freedom of other be limited, if not snuffed out, yes, judging them harshly and taking steps to prevent that is not only legitimate, but wise.
Point taken, that's why probably won't be able to come up with something to rebut that. I just feel as if there are two points conflicting each other in this situation: 1. That we are free to practice our beliefs and 2. It's just not right to beat the crap out of people. We all have human dignity. I just find it a very conflicting issue is all.

Agreed, and in so doing as a good Canadian, I say we ban Islam.
Not necessarily ban it! But maybe help do something about it? :D

Agreed, and so long as we keep allowing other cultures to infect our host culture, that freedom will steadily erode, until it is all but a distant memory.
True say. Canada is very multicultural which doesn't help to distinguish our own Canadian culture. It's good to have variety, but distinction would be good too.

Agreed, it also helps one assess issues with certain aspects of religions, that are not conducive to a free and open society.
Yes, as well, one is able to see into both sides of the story.

Absolutely incorrect. Canada is a diverse nation where important questions like this should be asked and answered.

That's why we're a free and open society.
As I said before, we're all entitled to our opinions, so, point taken.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I've been beaten by Christians, my people decimated by Christians, my culture torn a sunder by Christians.
Yes, I'm familiar with that sorry tale, not your personal one of course but the broader historical one, and it does not seem apparent from that that individual civil rights and freedoms get much respect among Christians, except perhaps as they apply to other Christians. You can freely pick on Christians and call out the government and all the other things you like to do precisely because Christianity has no secular authority and cannot inflict its values on you.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I guess, entitled to our own opinions I suppose?
Of course I am, that what you get in a free and open secular society. Which is why Islam should never be allowed to take a hold in North America.

Point taken, that's why probably won't be able to come up with something to rebut that. I just feel as if there are two points conflicting each other in this situation: 1. That we are free to practice our beliefs and 2. It's just not right to beat the crap out of people. We all have human dignity. I just find it a very conflicting issue is all.
You bet it's conflicting. The irony in the fact that I adore my free and open society, while opining that we exclude a position of it, is not only contradictory, but hypocritical.

Not necessarily ban it! But maybe help do something about it? :D
I'm open to suggestions.

True say. Canada is very multicultural which doesn't help to distinguish our own Canadian culture. It's good to have variety, but distinction would be good too.
I agree, I absolutely love being able to experience everything from Greek culture to Laotian, in an afternoons drive. But I'm to give up a small portion of my humanity, to protect what we have for future generations.

Yes, as well, one is able to see into both sides of the story.
Let freedom of speech reign.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Yes, I'm familiar with that sorry tale, not your personal one of course but the broader historical one, and it does not seem apparent from that that individual civil rights and freedoms get much respect among Christians, except perhaps as they apply to other Christians. You can freely pick on Christians and call out the government and all the other things you like to do precisely because Christianity has no secular authority and cannot inflict its values on you.
Agreed. The reason for that is, wise men, with a healthy dose of the base ideology of Christianity recognized that in small doses, Christian values, have merit.

But the manipulations of man and there affect on the Church, most be subject to isolation from the state.

I say they were wise, wise men indeed. But they were still Christians...:lol: