Ocean Breeze said:
I don't think you even bothered reading or watching the flash on that site.
Amazing how a few words can give you the wrong impression eh?
BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OFFENCES
- Thread starter moghrabi
- Start date
I don't think you even bothered reading or watching the flash on that site.
Amazing how a few words can give you the wrong impression eh?
Ocean Breeze said:
Funny they did not show any of the Isreali Busses after they were blown to bits in the "Palestinian Freedom" section. I guess Isreali civillians don't matter.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0608-01.htm
Wonder if bush /blair are prepared to swear on the bible about this . Hmmm.
( would bet they would refuse to be questioned----and simply dismiss it. Well, bush would. Blair might have some conscience about this)
Gotta wonder what suppression tactics bush will employ this time.
Holding him accountable might be like trying to hang on to a slippery eel.
smack: common now. Who is talking about Israel ??? The topic is the US casualties......Iraqis and their own.
Wonder if bush /blair are prepared to swear on the bible about this . Hmmm.
( would bet they would refuse to be questioned----and simply dismiss it. Well, bush would. Blair might have some conscience about this)
Gotta wonder what suppression tactics bush will employ this time.
Holding him accountable might be like trying to hang on to a slippery eel.
smack: common now. Who is talking about Israel ??? The topic is the US casualties......Iraqis and their own.
The mainstream press just won't cover it, Ocean. Just they hardly covered the Valerie Plame thing or the fact that Bush lied about the metal tubes.
You are probably quite right. In a way , we must be patient and excuse the "American" population, as they are simply NOT INFORMED.
( but what is inexcusable, is relying on the US media only for info......when more accurate data is available online.)
RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
They don't have to look to foreign sources though. The Nation (oldest weekly in the US, and an excellent magazine BTW), broke the Plame story. Harper's broke Abu Ghraib. There are plenty of US sources that are accurate, but are not controlled by Bush apologists. The thing is that people have been trained to think that they are radical leftist sources and not accurate.
They don't have to look to foreign sources though. The Nation (oldest weekly in the US, and an excellent magazine BTW), broke the Plame story. Harper's broke Abu Ghraib. There are plenty of US sources that are accurate, but are not controlled by Bush apologists. The thing is that people have been trained to think that they are radical leftist sources and not accurate.
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
indeed. you are right about that. Maybe it is selective reading that is hindering the knowledge process???
Who knows, but something is out of whack.
Reverend Blair said:
indeed. you are right about that. Maybe it is selective reading that is hindering the knowledge process???
Who knows, but something is out of whack.
RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
It's the television and radio media. That's where most people get their news and it is controlled by the right of the political spectrum. The mainstream newspapers and magazines are almost as bad.
Car magazines always made me mad because they would never say anything negative about a car if the manufacturer was an advertiser. Now the whole mainstream media in the US is like that. They also send out a constant implicit message that "alternative" news sources aren't as trustworthy.
It's the television and radio media. That's where most people get their news and it is controlled by the right of the political spectrum. The mainstream newspapers and magazines are almost as bad.
Car magazines always made me mad because they would never say anything negative about a car if the manufacturer was an advertiser. Now the whole mainstream media in the US is like that. They also send out a constant implicit message that "alternative" news sources aren't as trustworthy.
indeed. That's why (personally) I no longer watch any TV news at all.... (only TEEVEE......worth watching are home improvement shows......and only if one has a valid credit card at home depot
RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
You shouldn't shop at Home Despot if you can avoid it. Rona either. They push a lot of small contractors out of business with their "we install" policies. They push a lot of small lumber yards and supply stores out of business too.
I watch a lot of TV news...all of the stations, even the American ones. The only ones that are really reliable are the CBC and, sometimes CTV. BBC World is good, but I don't get the whole channel, just the CBC broadcast.
You shouldn't shop at Home Despot if you can avoid it. Rona either. They push a lot of small contractors out of business with their "we install" policies. They push a lot of small lumber yards and supply stores out of business too.
I watch a lot of TV news...all of the stations, even the American ones. The only ones that are really reliable are the CBC and, sometimes CTV. BBC World is good, but I don't get the whole channel, just the CBC broadcast.
diverting from the topic for a moment......but I don't shop there.......the remark was tongue in cheek.....and based on a program I do watch. ( Trading Spaces, and While You Were Out......on TLC......both of which are sponsored by Home Depot;-)
(sorry for the diversion, but wanted to clarify that )
RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
It's good to know you don't feed the greed frenzy. You shouldn't watch those shows either. Mrs. Rev watches them and she always has some weird plan for me to carry out. I just nod until the next show comes on and she has to start planning all over again. ;-)
It's good to know you don't feed the greed frenzy. You shouldn't watch those shows either. Mrs. Rev watches them and she always has some weird plan for me to carry out. I just nod until the next show comes on and she has to start planning all over again. ;-)
Re: RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
too funny. ..........but understand exactly what you mean. :wink:
Reverend Blair said:
too funny. ..........but understand exactly what you mean. :wink:
http://christianityandtheconfusion.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/6/6/915682.html
cast your vote everyone.....
(when we start hearing the "I" word in the media......it might take on serious meaning.
Last "voting results":
Who was more deserving of impeachment?
1) George W. Bush
216 (74%)
2) Richard M. Nixon
45 (15%)
3) W. J. Clinton
29 (10%)
cast your vote everyone.....
(when we start hearing the "I" word in the media......it might take on serious meaning.
Last "voting results":
Who was more deserving of impeachment?
1) George W. Bush
216 (74%)
2) Richard M. Nixon
45 (15%)
3) W. J. Clinton
29 (10%)
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/05/06/con05202.html
the "I" word is gaining a bit more momentum.....(on the WWW , if not in Bush country's media. )
the "I" word is gaining a bit more momentum.....(on the WWW , if not in Bush country's media. )
RE: BUSH'S IMPEACHABLE OF
Not only is not going to be impeached, but with any luck, they'll amend the constitution and Bush will be in office even longer.
Not only is not going to be impeached, but with any luck, they'll amend the constitution and Bush will be in office even longer.